U 377
17:40 to 18:20
-28° to -39°
CrA, Oph, Sco, Sgr

FEATURED OBJECTS: NGC 6405, NGC 6400, NGC 6563, NGC 6565, NGC 6416, NGC 6415, NGC 6425, NGC 6441, NGC 6444, NGC 6453, NGC 6421, NGC 6437, NGC 6451, NGC 6455, Tr 30, Tr 31, NGC 6476, NGC 6522, NGC 6528, NGC 6529, NGC 6519, NGC 6551, NGC 6475, NGC 6569, .

NGC 6405
Butterfly Cluster
Messier 6, Mel 178, Cr 341
RA 17:40:04
Dec -32°12.0'
Open cluster

Burnham notes that the discovery of M6 is usually credited to de Cheseaux in 1746, “though the cluster is a definite naked eye object, and appears to be mentioned, along with M7, in the catalogue of Ptolemy. They seem to be the “Girus ille nebulosus” of the 1551 edition of the Almagest, and also appear in Ulug Beg's star catalogue as the “Stella nebulosa quae sequitur aculeum Scorpionis [The Cloudy Ones which Follow the Sting]” De Cheseaux, however, was probably the first to identify M6 as “a very fine star cluster”.”

In 1752 it was seen by Lacaille who included it in his 1755 catalogue as Class III No. 12. In his half-aninch 8x telescope he saw it as a “remarkable group of faint stars in parallel lines making a diamond 20-25 minutes diameter filled with nebulosity.”

Messier, in 1764, found it “a cluster of small stars between the bow of Sagittarius and the tail of Scorpius. To the naked eye it resembles a nebula without a star, but even a small telescope reveals it as a cluster of small stars. Diameter 15'.” Flammarion saw here “stars of 7-10 mag very dispersed and arranged in a remarkable pattern... three starry avenues leading to a large square.” Burnham regards it as one of the most attractive clusters for very small instruments, calling it “a completely charming group whose arrangement suggests the outline of a butterfly with open wings. The main portion of M6 just fills a 25' field, and the cluster is at its best in a good 6 or 8-inch glass with wide-angle oculars. Visually, the brightest member is the golden K-type giant which highlights the NE wing-tip; this is the semi-regular variable BM Scorpii...”

In the Philosophical Transactions, 1814, Herschel described it as “a cluster of stars of various sizes containing several lines that seem to be drawing to a centre like a forming cluster.” In the Appendix to the 1912 'Scientific Papers of Sir William Herschel' this object is described as “1783, July 30. 20 feet, lower power. I counted above 50 stars; it contains the greatest variety of magnitudes of any nebula I recollect. The compound eyepiece shows more of them variously scattered and intermixt.”

h: “Chief star 7m of a fine, L discrete cluster of stars 10..11m; one star is 7m, one 7-8m. Fills field; VIII class.”

Bailey, examining a Bruce plate (Harvard Annals, Vol 72, No 2), describes it as “Milky Way, coarse cluster, pretty bright stars, several hundred, diameter 30'.”

Tom Lorenzin, in the e-version of “1000+ The Amateur Astronomers’ Field Guide to Deep Sky Observing”, notes: “4.6M; 25' diameter; bright and medium rich; cluster N6416 (8.7M; 20' diameter) sparse and dim <1 degree E; cluster N6404 (10.6M 5' diameter) compressed and dim 1 degree to S; see VADSS-183.”

Harrington notes that “most observers can immediately spot two stellar wings spreading out from the groups more densely packed body. ... of the 80 stars that make up the butterfly, more than a third are bright enough to be seen with 7x50 binoculars. Observers viewing through giant glasses may be able to count 50 suns, while 6- to 8-inch telescopes reveal all of the cluster members. The brightest star within M6 is BM Sco, a blazing orange irregular variable that fluctuates between 6.8 and 8.7 in about 850 days.”

Donald J. Ware: “The Butterfly Cluster. This fine open cluster is large, about 25' in diameter and contains over a hundred bright and relatively bright stars. It is called the Butterfly Cluster because some observers see the shape of a butterfly formed by the stars. This cluster is visible to the naked eye as a faint patch of light.”

Steve Coe, observing with a 17.5” f/4.5 at 100X, notes: “(M 6) Very, very bright, very large, pretty rich, somewhat compressed at 60X. This cluster is easily naked eye and several of the brighter members can be seen in 10X50 binoculars. The shape has caused observers to see a butterfly in this cluster and I agree with that evaluation. There are even two delicate curved chains of stars that form "antennae". BM SCO is a variable star on the east side, it is a nice orange color.; 6" f/6 Dugas 63 stars resolved with 8.8mm EP. Great view with the 22mm, shows cluster and field around it, going to higher powers brings out lots of pretty faint members.

11x80: A bright band of stars. Making the outline are six stars forming two joined parallelograms, making a V-shaped wire-frame box. Inside are scattered many smaller stars. The eastern parallelogram is most densely populated and also has a bright orange star in the following tip. (suburban skies, moderate conditions) [AS]

10x50: Amazingly bright; very rich and condensed; background glow from unresolved stars; 4 brightest stars form a rectangle lying on the SW-NE axis of the cluster. [RH]

NGC 6400
Mel 177, Cr 342, Rb 121
RA 17:40:16
Dec -36°56.9'
Open cluster

Dunlop No. 568: “a very faint cluster of very small stars, resembling faint nebula; the stars are considerably congregated to the centre, irregular round figure.”

h: “Cluster class VII, p rich; pL, irr R, 8', stars 9..10m.”

Steve Coe, observing with a 17.5” f/4.5 at 100X, notes: “Faint, pretty large, somewhat rich at 100X. This is a long string of stars with several other members.

11x80: Readily seen east of the sting as a milky way haze, no stars. Clearly elongated north-south -- just like an oval globular cluster. (suburban skies, moderate conditions) [AS]

15.5-inch f/9 Newtonian: A small open cluster of highly irregular shape lying to the north of an 8th magnitude star. The grouping is very irregular, the pretty bright stars allowing the eye to form many trails and curls; there are at least three star chains and one star loop easily visible. There are roughly two dozen 10th magnitude stars here. The cluster appears roughly elongated in a north-south direction. (suburban skies) [AS]

NGC 6563
ESO394-PN033, PK358-07.01
RA 17:44:23
Dec -35°01.0'
Planetary nebula

h: “planetary nebula. little elliptic, hazy at borders, seen as last night (see next obs).” On a second occassion he called it “A L, F, oval, planetary nebula, about 1' long, 50 arcseconds broad, or 55 arcseconds; considerably hazy, or rather indistinctly terminated at the borders, but not bM; a star 6-7 precedes it, just 1 diameter of the field and nearly in the parallel.”

William P. Clarke (San Diego, California, USA) writes in the The Webb Society Nebulae and Clusters Section Report No. 11, January 1993: “A small, oval patch extended N-S. Forms a box with 3 field stars. No central star seen. (10-inch Newtonian, x80)”

Steve Coe, observing with a 13” f/5.6, notes: “Pretty bright, pretty large, round and greenish at 165X. My source says that this object is 13th magnitude. I disagree, it seems more like 12th to me.”

In the online Southern Observer (article “The planetary nebulae of Sagittarius”) this planetary is recorded as: “ This pale blue mag 11.0 disc appears about 40" across in 25cm. The disc is evenly illuminated and is clearly annular wit a bright streak on the W edge. Though it is reported that high powers show it elongated, I see no evidence of it at powers up to x232. The field is crammed with glittering milky way. To find: Locate Epsilon Sagittari, at the SW end of the base of the "teapot". The nebulae is 2-3 low power fields away WNW in the direction of Antares near a group of three mag 6-7 stars. RA 18.12 Dec - 33.8. Winter.”

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a 14.0 mag planetary nebula.

NGC 6565
ESO456-PN070, PK003-04.05
RA 17:45:47
Dec -33°42.0'
Planetary nebula

Discovered by Pickering; described in the NGC as “planetary nebula; stellar.”

Tom Lorenzin, in the e-version of “1000+ The Amateur Astronomers’ Field Guide to Deep Sky Observing”, notes: “13M; 10” diameter; small and faint; looks stellar; difficult! between and to the SW of two stars, 7M and 8M.”

Steve Coe, observing with a 13” f/5.6, notes: “Pretty bright, small, very little elongated 1.2 X 1 in PA 165 at 285X. This planetary is light green and no central star was seen at any power.”

In the online Southern Observer (article “The planetary nebulae of Sagittarius”) this planetary is recorded as: “ Locking in RA on the previous object [NGC 6563], slew 6 degrees N in dec and you will locate this rather small (10") mag 11.6 uniformly illuminated slightly greenish, round disc with a very faint star on the N edge. Reminiscent of IC 418 in Lepus. RA 18.12 Dec 28.1. Winter.”

NGC 6416
Cr 344
RA 17:47:00
Dec -31°31.8'
Open cluster

Dunlop 612: “a cluster of small stars of mixt magnitudes, about 15' diameter, irregular figure.”

h: “Cluster class VIII of stars 11m; fills field; not rich; stars in zig-zag lines.” On a second occassion he called it “Coarse, rich, vL cluster. More than fills field. Stars 8..12m, one of 8m taken.”

Bailey, examining a Bruce plate (Harvard Annals, Vol 72, No 2), describes it as “milky way, pretty compressed, diameter 15'.”

Burnham calls this cluster a “sprinkling of star-dust” lying some 50' east of M6.

Steve Coe, observing with a 17.5” f/4.5 at 100X, notes: “Pretty bright, large, pretty rich, not compressed and elongated at 100X.

11x80: A soft milky way glow, like a slightly more dense starfield. A handful of small stars seen. (suburban skies, moderate conditions) [AS]

NGC 6415

RA 17:49:05
Dec -35°26.0'
"Non-existent"

h: “a great nebulous projection of the milky way.”

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a nonexistent object. Their coded description reads NF S.

NGC 6425
ESO455-SC038, OCL 1033
RA 17:49:35
Dec -34°49.2'
Open cluster

h: “Small cluster VIII class, 8' diameter, has 20 or 30 stars, 9..12m, nearly insulated.”

Bailey, examining a Bruce plate (Harvard Annals, Vol 72, No 2), describes it as “Milky Way, coarse cluster, few stars, diameter 10'.”

Steve Coe, observing with a 17.5” f/4.5 at 100X, notes: “Pretty faint, pretty small, not compressed, 30 stars in an 8' field at 100X, not much.

10x50: Small blur just visible; no stars resolved. (suburban skies) [RH]

11x80: A roundish puff of light, maybe a brighter patch near the centre. Like a low-surface-brightness globular cluster. (suburban skies) [AS]

6-inch f/8.6 Newtonian: At 52x, a poor cluster of stars 10m and fainter. About 10-15 10th mag stars counted, no more seen at 108x. It has an irregular shape, apparently distributed into three clumpy regions. The same 10-15 stars are seen at 52x, making a delicate scattering of stars. (suburban skies) [AS]

NGC 6441
GCL-78, 4U1746-37
RA 17:50:12
Dec -37°03.0'
Globular cluster

Dunlop 557: “a small well-defined rather bright nebula, about 20 arcseconds diameter, a very small star precedes it, but it is not involved; following gamma Telescopii.”

h: “globular, B, R, vgbM, up to a blaze. In field with Gamma Telescopii, and nearly on the same parallel; with left eye I barely see it resolved into stars 18 or 20m. The whole ground of the heavens, for an immense extent, is thickly sown with such stars. A beautiful object.” On a second occassion he called it “globular, B, R, 1.5', vgbM, resolvable (barely so), a very regularly graduating neb or cluster; in field with gamma Telescopii.”

Tom Lorenzin, in the e-version of “1000+ The Amateur Astronomers’ Field Guide to Deep Sky Observing”, notes: “8M; 3' diameter; bright, round and compressed; unresolved at 200X; bright star in foreground; 3.5M G SCO in same field a few minutes W.”

Steve Coe, observing with a 17.5” f/4.5 at 100X, notes: “Bright, pretty large, round, very bright middle, very grainy at 165X. Two stars are resolved at 320X. Seen in the finder.

6-inch f/8.6 Newtonian: Quite easily shown at 52x. The cluster appears as a ghostly after-image of the orange star G Sco, which it follows. There is a 10m star to the SW of the cluster 3.5 times closer than G Sco. The cluster appears nebulous, round, bM, pL, pB with a broad centre. The combination cluster-G Sco makes a very attractive sight. It should be quite a challenge in binoculars. (suburban skies) [AS]

NGC 6444
Ru 132, OCL 1023
RA 17:50:42
Dec -30°12.5'
Open cluster

h: “a v fine L rich scattered cluster of stars 12..13..m.”

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a nonexistent object. Their coded description reads NOCL S.

10x50: Nothing visible. (suburban skies) [RH]

NGC 6453
ESO393-SC036, GCL-79
RA 17:50:54
Dec -34°36.0'
Globular cluster

h: “a highly condensed nebulous mass, 3' diam, or an irreg R neb; pmbM, resolvable.”

6-inch f/8.6 Newtonian: At 52x, it appears as a faint nebulous presence west of M7. It has a 9m star east and a 10m star closer west. It does not magnify well in the 6-inch; 52x shows it with attention, 108x larger but not clearer, and 325x is too much. No further details seen. (suburban skies) [AS]

NGC 6421

RA 17:52:00
Dec -35°23.0'
"Non-existent"

Recorded in the NGC as “Cl, vL, pRi, stars 8..12” The NGC assigns h3702 to both NGC 6416 and NGC 6421. However, in the Cape Obs. John Herschel recorded h3702 and an anonymous object on different occasions. The latter object’s coordinates correspond with the recorded position for NGC 6421 in Dreyer’s NGC. Herschel sketched it, calling it “a most remarkable, well insulated, semi-nebulous milky way patch of a branching rounded figure, within the limits of the field, quite insulated on the preceding, north and following side, and only connected on the southern side by a narrow isthmus with a brnach of the milky way, which runs meriodionally to a great extent. It forms a VI class cluster of the utmost tenuity, barely resolvable, not resolved. See fig 1, plate V.”

The SAC database comments: “hotly debated, large cluster between M6 & M7”

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a nonexistent object. Their coded description reads NF S.

NGC 6437

RA 17:53:47
Dec -29°08.0'
"Non-existent"

h: “a very decided, tolerably defined semi-nebulous mass in milky way, with abundance of vS stars, forming altogether a telescopic magellanic cloud. It fills about a field and has branches and sinuses, and is altogether a very remarkable object.”

The SAC database comments: “HYNES: 6in, very faint, adjoins large cluster to west”

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a nonexistent object. Their coded description reads NOCL S.

NGC 6451
Mel 181, Cr 352, Rb 123
RA 17:53:50
Dec -34°47.6'
Open cluster

Discovered in 1785 by William Herschel (H VI-013) with an 18.7-inch f/13 speculum telescope. He called it “a cluster of small and pretty compressed stars of several magnitudes, 5' or 6' diameter, not very rich.”

h: “pretty rich, irregularly round, stars 13m, a cluster with a great black cut acorss it; 6' diameter, with many outliers.” On a second occassion he called it “a remarkable cluster, divided into two by a broad vacant straight band, irregularly round, 8' diameter, stars 12..15m, See fig 6, Plate V.” He also mentions this cluster in his comment on NGC 5128: “On the other hand we have, in the completely resolved cluster,[NGC 6451], an object which, removed to such a distance as to appear nebulous, would present a considerably approach to it in point of general aspect.”

Tom Lorenzin, in the e-version of “1000+ The Amateur Astronomers’ Field Guide to Deep Sky Observing”, notes: “9M; 6' diameter; fairly large, rich and compressed; 50-plus 10 thru 13M members.”

Steve Coe, observing with a 17.5” f/4.5 at 100X, notes: “Bright, pretty large, pretty rich, compressed open cluster at 165X. It is bright enough that it can be seen in the 8X50 finder. It includes a close triple star which appears nebulous at low powers and is resolved at 320X. I estimated 50 members in the cluster and it includes a dark lane almost down the middle of the cluster.

6-inch f/8.6 Newtonian: At 52x, the cluster shows half a dozen or so 9..10m stars forming a dim, irregular grouping. There is either much unresolved haze inbetween the stars, or the optics are dewed. (suburban skies) [AS]

NGC 6455

RA 17:54:34
Dec -30°26.0'
"Non-existent"

h: “a very extensive nebulous clustering mass of the milky way. the stars of excessive smallness, and infinite in number.”

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a nonexistent object. Their coded description reads NOCL S.

Tr 30
ESO394-SC012, Harvard 18, Cr 355
RA 17:56:44
Dec -35°15.7'
Open cluster

Trumpler (Lick Obs Bul, Vol 14, No. 420) gives the diameter as 15' and the class as 4 3 m. He notes: “Mentioned by Barnard (Bd.Atl. pl 24) as ‘a scattering cluster of smaller stars.’ ”

6-inch f/8.6 Newtonian: Readily seen at 52x as a mottled, resolvable patch. It is faint, irregular in shape and star-poor, with the stars in lines. There is an 8th mag star NNE of the cluster; this star has a faint companion to its SSW in the direction of the cluster. 108x shows this companion, 325x very easily. The cluster appears to extend further east that shown on the Uranometria 2000 chart. This extension consists of a few stars in curved configurations; the cluster itself is probably no more than 10 stars of about 9th mag and fainter. (suburban skies) [AS]

Tr 31
ESO456-SC033, Cr 357
RA 17:59:48
Dec -28°09.6'
Open cluster

Trumpler (Lick Obs Bul, Vol 14, No. 420) gives the diameter as 4.5' and the class as 2 2 m. He notes: “Found on plate 26 of Bd.Atl. as a small pretty dense cluster of well defined somewhat triangular outline in the Great Sagittarius cloud.”

NGC 6476

RA 18:03:23
Dec -29°48.0'
"Non-existent"

h: “Nebula. No descriptions. It is probably only a nebulous portion of the milky way.”

Meade XL 200, 40mm eyepiece, 53’ fov: Very busy haze starfield peppered with faint stars. Only a few brighter stars form a corona half moon shape to the northern side of the field. [MS]

NGC 6522
ESO456-SC043, GCL-82, H49
RA 18:03:35
Dec -30°02.0'
Globular cluster

Discovered in 1784 by William Herschel (H I-049) with an 18.7-inch f/13 speculum telescope. He called it “B pL bM resolvable.”

h: “globular, B, R, gvmbM, in a nebuloid portion of the milky way; resolved; stars 16..17m.” On a second occassion he called it “globular, pB, S, R, 80 arcseconds, resolved into stars 16m (See the remark on II.200 [NGC 6528].”

Tom Lorenzin, in the e-version of “1000+ The Amateur Astronomers’ Field Guide to Deep Sky Observing”, notes: “10.5M; 2' diameter; round and unresolved; GLOB N6528 (11M; 1' diameter) 10' to ESE; 0.5 degree NW of Gamma SGR- the 3M star at the tip of the spout of SGR's Teapot asterism.”

Houston writes that this globular is “well worth a look ... it is about 5' in diameter and magnitude 8.6.”

Steve Coe, observing with a 13” f/5.6, notes: “Pretty bright, pretty large, and much brighter in the middle, round and very grainy at 135X.”

Gerd Bahr-Vollrath (Noosa Heads, Queensland, Australia) observing with an 8-inch f/12 SCT, writes in the The Webb Society Nebulae and Clusters Section Report No. 10, July 1992: “ [NGC 6522 & NGC 6528] Separated by less than 20', these two globular clusters can be viewed together in a medium power field of view. A rare 'double'! NGC 6522 is the brighter and larger of the pair and shows a gradual increase in brightness towards a prominent small core. NGC 6528 is a small round glow with only a slight increase in brightness towards the core. Both globulars were unresolved and are set in a very rich starfield, only four degrees from the galactic centre.”

8-inch f/6.7 Newtonian, 9mm eyepiece: Precedes NGC 6528 in the same wide field. Very bright, visible with low power. [GG]

Meade 12-inch Newtonian, 40mm eyepiece, 53’ fov: Very small globular cluster in size, brighter towards the middle and mottled around the edges. This globular cluster reveals a granular look embedded in haziness. A faint star visible right on the edge. [MS]

NGC 6528
ESO456-SC048, GCL-84
RA 18:04:48
Dec -30°03.0'
Globular cluster

Discovered in 1784 by William Herschel (H II-200) with an 18.7-inch f/13 speculum telescope. He called it “F, pS, r, unequally bright.” This globular lies about half a degree north-west of Gamma Sagittarii. It is described in the NGC as pretty faint, considerably small and round, gradually brighter to the middle, well resolved and consisting of stars of 16 mag. Just to its west lies the brighter globular NGC 6522.

h: “globular, pB, R, gbM, resolved into stars 16..17m, in a nebuloid of the milky way.” On a second occassion he called it “globular, B, S, R, glbM, resolved into stars 16m. Both this and I.49 occur on a ground so astronishingly rich and stippled with stars 17m individually discernible, as hardly to admit a pin's point between the stars, and this fills more than the whole field or many fields.”

Gerd Bahr-Vollrath (Noosa Heads, Queensland, Australia) observing with an 8-inch f/12 SCT, writes in the The Webb Society Nebulae and Clusters Section Report No. 10, July 1992: “ [NGC 6522 & NGC 6528] Separated by less than 20', these two globular clusters can be viewed together in a medium power field of view. A rare 'double'! NGC 6522 is the brighter and larger of the pair and shows a gradual increase in brightness towards a prominent small core. NGC 6528 is a small round glow with only a slight increase in brightness towards the core. Both globulars were unresolved and are set in a very rich starfield, only four degrees from the galactic centre.”

Steve Coe, observing with a 13” f/5.6, notes: “Pretty bright, pretty large, bright in the middle at 100X. It is paired next to NGC 6522, two nearly matched globulars afloat in a rich Milky Way field just at the tip of the spout of the Teapot.”

8-inch f/6.7 Newtonian, 9mm eyepiece: Follows NGC 6522 in the same wide field. Faint, visible with medium and high power. [GG]

12-inch Meade Newtonian, 40mm eyepiece, 53’ fov: This small roundish globular cluster is starlike in appearance compressed with haziness around it in a medium to busy starfield. Both NGC 6528 and NGC 6522 are visible in my starfield and make a beautiful pair. [MS]

NGC 6529

RA 18:05:30
Dec -36° 18.0'
"Non-existent"

Dunlop 569: “a pretty large, faint nebula, round figure, 5' or 6' diameter, resolvable into very minute stars, with nebula remaining.”

h: “a large milky way patch, much compressed, one portion much more so.”

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a nonexistent object. Their coded description reads NOCL S.

NGC 6519

RA 18:08:58
Dec -29°33.0'
"Non-existent"

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a nonexistent object. Their coded description reads NF S.

NGC 6551

RA 18:08:58
Dec -29° 33.0'
"Non-existent"

The RNGC (Sulentic and Tifft 1973) notes that this is a nonexistent object. Their coded description reads NF S.

NGC 6475
Messier 7, Mel 183, Cr 354
RA 18:12:01
Dec -33°08.0'
Planetary nebula

M7 is a large and brilliant group, easily seen with the naked eye, and “one of the few clusters which can be thoroughly appreciated in a good pair of field glasses” writes Burnham. He continues: “It is mentioned in the catalogue of Ptolemy, and in the 16th century Latin translation of the Almagest appears as “Girus ille nebulosus”, the reference probably including both M7 and M6. The Arabian name “Tali al Shaulah” is the equivalent of the Latin translation of Ulug Beg's title: “Stella nebulosa quae sequitur aculeum Scorpionis [The Cloudy Ones which Follow the Sting]” Hevelius includes M7 in a list published in 1690, and it appears again in W. Derham's short catalogue of “nebulous stars” in 1730.

Lacaille observed it at the Cape of Good Hope in 1751, and included it in his 1755 catalogue as Class II No. 14. In his half-an-inch 8x telescope he saw it as a “group of 15 to 20 stars in a square.”

Messier, in May 1764, described M7 as “a cluster considerably larger than the preceding [M6]. It appears to the naked eye as a nebulosity; it is situated a short distance from the preceding, between the bow of Sagittarius and the tail of Scorpius. Diameter 30'.”

In the Appendix to the 1912 'Scientific Papers of Sir William Herschel' this object is described as “1783, July 30. About 20 small stars (Only seen once).”

h: “a brilliant coarse cluster class VIII of about 60 stars 7-8 .. 12m, which fills field. Irregular figure. A star 8m taken.” On a second occassion he called it “Cluster VIII Very fine and brilliant; stars of very large and mixed magnitudes. Fills field.”

The cluster is seen projected on a background of numerous faint and distance Milky Way stars, while the bright stars of the group are close to naked-eye visibility. On Lowell Observatory 13-inch telescope plates the bright central portion of the cluster just fills a 30' field; the total apparent diameter is possibly about 50'....M7 contains 80 stars brighter than 10th magnitude in a field 1.2 in diameter. The group as a whole resembles Praesepe (M44) in Cancer, though somewhat smaller, and would certainly be as well known if it were further north. Incidentally, this is the southernmost object in the catalogue of Messier.”

Harrington writes that Messier's description “seems a bit sterile for such a magnificent group. My 7x50 wide-angle binoculars create a three-dimensional effect as many of the brighter stars appear to float in front of fainter points of light. Colors abound in M7, with several stars tinted yellow and blue. The brightest is a G-type star of 6th mag lying close to the group's centre.”

Hartung notes that M7 is “a remarkable sight in a large field with its structure of quadrant and straight lines. With outliers it is more than 40' wide, and very effective for small telescopes. The fine orange star S.p. is the very close pair Struve 342. This close double was discovered in 1897 by T.J.J. See, and Hartung notes that it seems elongated but not truly resolved with a 12-inch telescope.

Tom Lorenzin, in the e-version of “1000+ The Amateur Astronomers’ Field Guide to Deep Sky Observing”, notes: “5M; 1 degree diameter! 50-plus 7 thru 11M members; easy naked-eye object; GLOB N6453 (11M; 1' diameter) 30' to WNW from N6475's center; M-7 looks like M-6 but twice as large; each's brightest star is deep orange.”

Donald J. Ware:”This beautiful open cluster is almost a degree in diameter, so either very low powers or binoculars should be used to optimally view it. This loosely concentrated cluster is easily visible to the naked eye, but should you observe it through a telescope, be sure to look for NGC 6453. This is a small, faint globular cluster seemingly imbedded in M-7's western edge.”

John Bortle (Webb Society Quarterly Journal, January 1976) using 10x50 binoculars, estimates the visual magnitude as 2.8.

Steve Coe, observing with a 17.5” f/4.5 at 100X, notes: “ (M 7) Very, very bright, very, very large, not compressed, many faint members at 60X. This huge cluster is easily naked eye, even on poor nights. I can resolve 8 to 10 of the brightest members in 10X50 binoculars. It is at its best in an RFT. Using a 4.25" f/4 at 16X there is enough room around the cluster to frame it in the Milky Way and there are 40 stars resolved with this modest scope.; 6" f/6 Dugas Very, very bright, very, very large, not compressed, 49 stars counted, including a nice orange 9th mag star on the SW edge of the cluster. Several delicate pairs and groupings, best view ever of this cluster.

10x50: Triangle-shaped glow with a distict x shaped pattern of stars in middle; wide field of stars 60'; stars more or less the same size; nebulosity of unresolved stars in the background; two darker patches each side of the x formation (OXO) (suburban skies) [RH]

11x80: Glorious cluster. One orange star. Dark nebulae near, esp. Barnard 283. (suburban skies, moderate conditions) [AS]

NGC 6569
ESO456-SC077, GCL-91
RA 18:13:36
Dec -31°49.2'
Globular cluster

Discovered in 1784 by William Herschel (H II-201) with an 18.7-inch f/13 speculum telescope. He called it “F, pL, lbM, r.”

h: “globular, pB, L, R, glbM, 4' diam, resolved into stars 15m.” On a second occassion he called it “globular, vB, L, R, gbM, 3' diam, resolved. In milky way.” His third observation was recorded as “globular, pB, R, vglbM, 3.5' diam, resolved.” On July 16, 1836 he noted: “Found in equatorial [5-inch refractor] in a zone review for double stars, where it appeared as a F R neb 1' diam.”

Tom Lorenzin, in the e-version of “1000+ The Amateur Astronomers’ Field Guide to Deep Sky Observing”, notes: “10M; 2' diameter; unresolved, bright, round glow with little center brightness; double star B-1353 nearby; 6.5M star 10' due S is hopeless DBL ST B-1353 (0.1” separation; both 7M).”

Steve Coe, observing with a 13” f/5.6, notes: “Bright, large, round, resolved 12 stars with a very grainy backround at 165X.”

6-inch f/8.6 Newtonian: This cluster appears as a faint, nebulous extended haze, not small, can be seen at 52x. There is a 7th mag star South. (suburban skies) [AS]

12-inch Meade Newtonian, 40mm eyepiece, 53’ fov. : A hazy small faint globular cluster difficult to determine. Uneven disk situated in a beautiful medium starfield. [AS]

Select a new chart by: Chart numbers | RA & Dec | Constellation | Month

HomeChart IndexResourcesSubscribeCertificatesAboutWhat's New

"Deepsky Observers Companion" (http://www.global.co.za/~auke) Copyright 1998 Auke Slotegraaf. All rights reserved. Uranometria 2000.0 copyright (c) 1987-1996 Willmann-Bell, Inc. Page last updated 1998 March 01