Performance Data and Prices!
Compare and make the clear choice:
Before specifying a motor that meets your needs for energy efficiency and severe operating environments, compare our new MAX-E2 to the competition. It's easy to estimate the power cost savings resulting from replacing a standard efficiency motor or competing premium efficiency motor with the MAX-E2. But don't just take our word for it, simply use the following formula to easily calculate the annual savings the new MAX-E2 will deliver.
S = 0.746 x HP x L x C x N (100/Eb - 100/Ea)
S = Annual savings in dollars
HP = Horse power
L = Percent load divide by 100
C = Cost of electricity ($/kilowatt hour, ex. $0.076/kWh)
N = Annual hours of operation (running time, ex. 24 hours a day for 365 days = 8760)
Ea = MAX-E2 motor efficiency (ex. 95.4% for 75 HP model)
Eb = Standard motor efficiency or competition (ex. 92.4%)
Example : S = 0.746 x 75 x 100/100 x 0.076 x 8760 (100/92.4 - 100/95.4)
S = $ 1267 per year
Licensed Professional Engineers on staff (In New York and New Jersey ONLY)
| Horse Power | Full Load RPM | Frame Size | Torque (lb-ft) | Nom. Eff. % | Min. Eff. % | Current (A) @460V | NEMA code | Wt. (lbs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1745 | 143T | 3.0 | 86.5 | 84.1 | 1.5 | N | 55 |
| 2 | 1730 | 145T | 6.1 | 86.5 | 85.3 | 2.8 | L | 62 |
| 3 | 1755 | 182T | 8.9 | 89.5 | 87.5 | 3.8 | K | 95 |
| 5 | 1750 | 184T | 15.0 | 89.5 | 88.1 | 6.2 | J | 114 |
| 7.5 | 1755 | 213T | 22.4 | 91.7 | 90.3 | 9.0 | H | 167 |
| 10 | 1755 | 215T | 30.0 | 91.7 | 90.4 | 11.8 | H | 189 |
| 15 | 1765 | 254T | 44.5 | 93.0 | 91.7 | 17.3 | G | 288 |
| 20 | 1765 | 256T | 59.5 | 93.0 | 92.0 | 22.8 | G | 332 |
Note:
