Site Map Use the dropdown bar to navigate. |
QUAD
77-10L Loudspeakers
THE FOLLOWING TEXT FROM THE OFFICIAL QUAD WEBSITE
Quad has produced the 10L in response to the perennial dilemma for most Quad customers that ESL-63s are too large, too expensive or both.
We used the Quad ESL-63 as a reference and designed a loudspeaker which comes as close as possible, given the constraints of box loudspeaker technology. No box loudspeaker can hope to sound exactly like an ESL-63, but the 77-10Ls have very similar overall presentation and are free from the colourations that characterise most box loudspeakers.
The fascination and frustration of successful moving coil loudspeaker design is that it depends as much upon art as science.
This begs the question "What is a good loudspeaker?" The most popular loudspeakers are not the highest fidelity. The ear, like the palate, benefits from education and the majority of listeners prefer prawn cocktail loudspeakers in which the blandness of the basic ingredients is masked by brightly coloured and astringent sauce. Our view on what is a good loudspeaker is unequivocally one with low coloration and distortion and we think that the Quad ESL-63 is still the ultimate reference.
Good box loudspeakers are expensive to manufacture. Bigger magnets, extensive crossovers and less resonant cabinets consume materials. Drive units and crossovers need to be matched. The 10L is pair matched to within 1dB over a broad band, which is essential for good stereo.
The only way to judge a loudspeaker is to listen to it, preferably in a familiar environment. Specifications will not tell you how a loudspeaker will sound although you can be pretty sure that a loudspeaker that has an on-axis frequency response with great peaks and dips will sound awful.
Quad 77 10L review from TNT Audio ©Werner Ogiers 1988
http://www.tnt-audio.com/casse/quad10le.html
A few years ago Quad introduced their 77-line of electronics, while
killing-off the older and quite unique 66-range of products. This made be feel
quite angry, and with some reason. The 66 system provided an excellent remote
control, was tailored to drive electrostatics, and was relatively good value for
money. The new 77 siblings had a dubious and optional remote control, an
also-dubious system-bus which ever so conveniently made it incompatible with
other brands' components, and they overall lacked the 66's versatility. To make
things worse, Quad introduced two rather expensive small box loudspeakers, as if
to say that their devotion to the electrostatic cause was less than it used to
be... As if to say that Quad would be no alternative brand anymore, but yet
another faceless Mission or Arcam...
God, I hated these speakers...
I hated them, and I completely forgot about them. Until I went to my regular
pusher for a listen to the Mission 750s. The little Quad 10Ls were standing
there too, ready to play. (By the way, the larger 20L had already been
discontinued at the take-over of Quad by Verity). Just for the sake of the
experience I asked the dealer to set up the little Quadies. And damn, did they
play music!
But more on that later. The BeF40000/$1300 10L is a tiny Spendor-designed
minispeaker with a tiny 13cm woofer and a tiny soft dome Vifa tweeter. The
smallish (325mm x 190mm x 240mm) enclosures are of the infinite baffle variety
(so maybe they can be put right against the back wall), and are finished in
immaculate yew (taxus) veneer. The binding posts are gold-plated, yet do not
support bi-wiring (that's OK with me). Quad specifies the lower bass limit as
55Hz for -6dB, while sensitivity is 84dB/2.83V @ 1m, with a sane and easy
nominal impedance of 8 Ohms. As a bonus, Quad matches both speakers of a pair to
within 1dB, to assure a good stereo performance. The speakers should be put on
heavy stands, and IMHO can easily find a place in about every room.
We put them on Atacama SC-24 pillars, and used the same test system as with the
Mission 750 review.
Now, the first thing you'll notice is these speakers' musicality: they play
music and they play it very well indeed. The overall impression they give is one
of poised neutrality. Everything there is in the mix can be heard, and no
frequency band ever fights the others. Quite unexpectedly the bass is detailed
and tight, and goes deep enough for my tastes.
In fact, it clearly conveys all of the bass notes there are in the music,
without overhang, and without boom. The midrange has a warmth and naturality
that, indeed, reminds one of the old ESL electrostatic, if with a bit less
transparency and hear-through character.
And the treble, well, that tweeter never puts a foot wrong, as with the about
ten CDs I played I never experienced one trace of harshness or undue emphasis.
Playing loud also went well: I tried Live (hard rock), Dead Can Dance's Toward
the Within life recording (kinda eerie acoustical strange weird music with fairy
vocals), and my beloved Monteverdi at levels louder that I would play with my
faithful ESLs, and the sound simply refused to break up.
I like my sound open and totally free of the speakers.
My ESLs perform that trick, and it is this property that enables me to dream
away on the music, as if I were not in my chair anymore. Now, in the dealer's
room, which is quite good but still so unfamiliar that I almost never experience
a decent sound stage there, the 10Ls did disappear, while for instance the
cheaper but just as small Mission 750s had the sound sticking to their
enclosures.
We also performed the same experiment as with the Missions. Foculpods between
stand and speaker made the bass a tad slow and fat, and dulled the sound
overall.
Fine if you have ear-piercing electronics or if you happen to live in a
bathroom. With Michell cones, things brightened up and detail was available in
abundance, yet without becoming overbearingly so.
As often, the best compromise might be in using tak (blue or black ;-) ) between
the speaker and its support.
So with the 10L we have here a small, easy-to-use speaker with a natural and
sweet sound, that is not afraid of going loud, and that is always well-behaved.
If I had to give up my ESLs for something more domestically acceptable, the 10L
would be the first on my list to try at home!
God, I love these speakers...
And things get even better. Quad also launched the new 707 stereo power amp,
which is like a 606-done-right: oodles of power, finesse, a low price, and darn
cool looks. Want electrostatics? You can have them. This year will see a
cosmetically updated ESL-63, a totally new large full range ESL-98, a smaller
model for home theater, and a subwoofer working with a totally new concept, they
claim.
Quad's back!
© Copyright 1998 Werner Ogiers
Frequency Range |
50Hz - 20kHz |
Frequency Response |
70Hz - 18kHz +/-3dB |
LF cut-off |
-6dB at 55Hz |
Power Rating |
70 Watts |
Sensitivity |
84dB for 2.83V input at 1 metre |
Input Connections |
4mm binding posts (bi-wirable) |
Nominal Impedance |
8 Ohms |
Weight |
7kg approximately |
Dimensions |
325mm x 190mm x 240mm |
Mick Evans 1999
-2000Last updated 11 July 2000
e-mail kevlar@kevlar.karoo.co.uk