Activities Report 1999 July Newsletter
Still who then is responsible?
Malaysian Nature Society (MNS) welcomes
the Cabinet swift action to amend the Environment Quality Act 1996, by
making the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) requirements more stringent
in the wake of the present Bukit Antarabangsa landslides. The proposal
to lower the minimum hectarage for EIA requirement from 50 to 25 ha is
certainly a good move. Yet, it may still do little to prevent incidents
like Highland Towers and the current crisis unless several key issues are
also addressed once and for all. - Whose responsibility
Currently, it seems that the monitoring and enforcement measures recommended
by an EIA may not necessarily be carried out since the State and not the
Federal Government has authority over land issues. This situation
severely handicaps the role of the EIA and undermines the interests and
safety of the public. It is of paramount importance that the Federal
and State governments seek a solution to this. Either the State agencies
take on the responsibility or the Federal Governmentshould be allowed to.
Whichever, people's lives and the environment must be protected.
- Sensitive areas
Reducing the minimum requirement for EIA to 25 ha will not have prevented
or avoided the current landslide threat faced by the Athenaeum condominium
at Bukit antarabangsa. Even with this change in requirements, the condominium
project would still be too small to require an EIA. Yet the threats and
dangers of building on steep slopes is very real. MNS recommends that any
development irrespective of size should be required to have an EIA if it
involves building on slopes greater than 20° and no development at
all on slopes above 30° as indeed recommended in the Draft Structural
Plan 1995-2020 for Ampang Jaya. This should probably be extended to any
development located within 200 m of such slopes. Indeed, these high risk
sensitive areas should be identified by geological survey and marked out
in local structural plans based on slope and the soil geology and only
essential development should be allowed according to very strict and established
criteria. - Geology component to EIAs and building plans
A geological survey and soil report are important in ensuring safety
of development projects in highlands and slopes and to minimise environmental
damage. Yet it has been reported that even when EIAs are carried out, this
component is often missing. MNS recommends that this be made a standard
requirement of any EIA or building plans in high risk areas. - Post
development monitoring and maintenance
MNS also welcomes the recommendation from Dr Ting Wen Hui, civil engineering
consultant, on the setting aside of funds mainly for the maintenance of
buildings and properties from the develo-per as done in some developed
countries. The fund would support the maintenance of buildings and the
testing of the geological conditions on a regular basis by the local authority.
Finally, it should be recognized that
much of Malaysia's hills and highlands are covered by highly weathered
rocks and soils which are not stable and often held in place by existingvegetation.
This is not the most suitable land for any form of construction and no
engineering solution will ever totally remove all risk. As we are
not short of lowland sites for construction, any development in high risk
areas should really be wisely avoided.
Kuala Lumpur, 20 May 1999
Back to 1999 July Newsletter index
[
Back to MNS Perak Home ]
Created on 30th June 1999