|
4.
With regard to overall numbers it is possible that the development
may have temporarily helped increase the local population. We
have no data on the amphibian population before the development
started but a substantial area to the north of the pond has been
temporarily allowed to revert to scrub thereby improving terrestrial
habitat and the pond itself has nearly doubled in size.
To sum up although the figures show large numbers of amphibia
caught in drains this may be partly the result of their being
forced to head for a single, unfamiliar, site which has been surrounded
with every obstacle, hazard and pit fall imaginable. One has to
admire the animals' persistence in getting there at all!
It would require more intensive monitoring than we were able to
conduct to gain a precise figure for the percentage of migrating
toads that were being trapped. It was certainly far more significant
than the numbers being run over. We never saw more than five road
casualties and usually less on any one evening. On March 18, however,
although all the drains were cleared at dusk and all visible toads
moved, 5 had fallen into drain B by 2130 hrs though what proportion
that represented of the total on the move is difficult to say.
Our guess is at least 10% of the toads trying to cross the
roundabout were caught.
Drain B and the most productive drain in the car park were all
next to kerbs too high for toads to climb. The road to the car
park from the roundabout, however, had a number of ramps flush
with the top of the kerb but plenty of toads managed to fall down
a drain directly adjacent to a ramp. Likewise there is no kerb
at all by the drains on the Kennel Farm road and yet frogs and
toads seemed to fall down them with monotonous regularity. The
road is little used and the toads, may be, were in the habit of
walking along it or alternatively the drains happened to be at
a preferred crossing point. At all events making it easier for
amphibia to negotiate kerbs may mitigate but not eliminate the
drain problem.
The same applies to devices placed in the drain to enable amphibia
to climb out. As already mentioned toads were often in amplexus
and mating balls of three or more were not uncommon. It seems
that trapping animals together in the drains increases the likelihood
of these clusters forming. Females are unable to climb out under
such circumstances and the males hang on long after the female
is dead.
CONCLUSION
Balancing ponds
are, we gather, increasingly being constructed in new housing
developments. It would be interesting to know if similar ponds
have generated comparable amphibia colonies. If there is any likelihood
of their doing so then various design features could easily be
incorporated to overcome at least some of the problems detailed
above.
The new road will greatly increase traffic and much of the present
terrestrial habitat will disappear. Approaches are being made
to the County Planning authorities via the IVCP to see if tunnels,
or other measures, can be constructed under or beside the road.
By coincidence one firm dealing with such items, ACO Wildlife,
Shefford, is local to the area. There is also the possibility
of constructing a pond in the proposed linear wood. Next year
there will be time to organise proper toad patrols if there is
sufficient response.
AFTERWORD
The April rain brought
out plenty of small frogs and a number were observed in the drains
particularly in the opening of the side pipe. Removing them was
tricky and we wondered if it was worthwhile. The Telegraph
Magazine of 11 April 1998
has an interview with a sewer Operations Assistant responsible
for the North East London area which mentions large colonies of
frogs in some sewers. Are the frogs happy to live there?
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to
thank the unknown lorry driver mentioned above; the receptionist
and staff at the District Council offices in Biggleswade for their
courtesy in answering our questions; and the manager of the swimming
pool for facilitating our access to the pond.
|