The
deliberate translocation of animals or plants is somewhat
controversial. Many biologists oppose this on the grounds
that it is unnatural. However, given certain guidelines
it is a useful technique that is often successful. Suitable
criteria for the assessment of a species' suitability
for (re)introduction have been produced by International
Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). They are:
1.
Good historical evidence that the species occurred in
the area in the past.
2. Clear understanding of the original reasons for local
extinction.
3. Cause of previous extinction no longer operates,
or can be removed.
4. Unlikely to recolonise naturally.
5. Reintroduction stock should come from the closest
population available to the original stock.
6. Sufficient animals must be introduced to minimize
any future risk of inbreeding in the new population.
7. The donor population must be sufficiently large to
safely sustain the loss of the an animals removed for
translocation.
Design
opportunities: overview
1. Introduction
Wildlife conservation is increasingly focusing on
the wider environment, and on our immediate surroundings
as viable wildlife habitats. Consequently the decisions
made when designing and managing the external environment
strongly influence a site's potential for wildlife.
Reptiles and amphibians are good examples of animals
which respond to modest changes in landscape design.
Many
landscape schemes fall short of achieving this potential.
The key reasons for this are:
1. Failure to consider a scheme's potential beyond
meeting its primary objectives.
2. Insufficient consideration of ecology in early assessments.
3. Designing wildlife habitats into plans too late in
the design process.
4. Not having an adequate understanding of basic ecological
principles or the needs of species or their habitats.
5. Failing to maintain habitats after construction.
It
is impossible here to be prescriptive or identity design
solutions appropriate to all situations. Instead this
text recommends a process for closer integration of
wildlife opportunities in landscape design schemes and
their subsequent management. The following pages will
consider the design strategies, design and maintenance
and management plans for amphibians.
2. Scope for developing opportunities on a site
Within landscape design and management there is
a need for greater consideration for the scope for wildlife
enhancement. This can be done through more reasoned
analysis of what is desirable, technically feasible
and through the development of a design strategy. Many
factors exist which should be used to promote this approach.
- Planning
requirement - determine if the planning process
can help proposals and if there are existing conservation
measures in place. 'Wildlife gain' may be
a planning requirement. Understand planning and
development opportunities - exploit the existing
planning system to implement proposals.
- 'Political
benefits' is wildlife enhancement of local
'political' significance; does it meet conservation
objectives (such as Biodiversity Action Plans) or
help achieve the client's/land manager's
policy objectives?
- Local
or national Bio diversity Action Plans may
exist for amphibians and reptiles and their habitats.
These may provide a useful source of guidance.
- Environment
requirement- assess the existing condition of
the site and what will be required to enhance it.
How practical is it to do?
- Personal
initiative - enlist the expertise of interested
individuals to advise, monitor and help.
-
Physical conditions of the site and its surroundings
and proposed end use -determine existing site
conditions and develop sites so they maximise opportunities.
(Provided
by and reproduced with permission of: English Nature)