The Development of Language




Cooperation¸ the ability to get together to solve problems of both subsistence and potential conflict¸ is a vital quality in human beings. We are unique in having a spoken¸symbolic language that enables us to communicate our most intimate feelings to one another. However¸ at what point did hominids acquire the ability to speak?

Our closest living relatives¸ the chimpanzees¸ communicate with gestures and many voice sounds in the wild¸ whereas other apes use sounds only to convey territorial information. However¸ chimpanzees cannot talk to us because they do not have the vocal apparatus to do so. Articulate speech was an important threshold in human evolution because it opened up whole new vistas of cooperative behavior and unlimited potential for the enrichment life. When did hominids abandon grunts for speech? We cannot inter language from the simple artifacts made by Homo habilis¸ but there are two potential lines of research open.

Both comparative anatomy and actual fossils can be used to study differences between apes and humans. Biological anthropologist Jeffery Laitman and others studied the position of the larynx high in the neck¸ a position that enables the larynx to lock into the air space at the back of the nasal cavity. Although this position allows animals like monkeys and cats to breathe and swallow at the same time¸ it limits the sounds they can produce. The pharynx—the air cavity part of the food pathway— can produce sounds¸ but animals use their mouths to modify sounds since they are anatomically incapable of producing the range of sounds needed for articulate speech.

Until they are about 18 months to 2 years old¸ human children's larynxes are also situated high in the neck. Then the larynx begins to descend¸ ending up between the fourth and seventh neck vertebrae. How and why are still a mystery¸ but the change completely alters the way the infant breathes¸ speaks¸ and swallows. Adult humans cannot separate breathing and swallowing¸ so they can suffocate when food lodges in an airway. However¸ an enlarged pharyngeal chamber above the vocal cords enables them to modify the sounds they emit in an infinite variety of ways¸ which is the key to human speech.

Using sophisticated analyses¸ Laitman and his colleagues ran tests on as many complete fossil skulls as possible. They found that the australopithecines of 4.0 to 1.0 million years ago had flat skull bases high larynxes¸ where as those of Homo erectus¸ dating to about 1.9 million years and later¸ show some what more curvature¸ suggesting that the larynx was beginning to descend to its modern position. It was only about 300¸000 years ago that the skull base assumed a modern curvature¸ which would allow for fully articulate speech to evolve. Homo habilis probably had very limited speaking abilities.

The real value of language¸ apart from the stimulation it gives brain development¸ is that with it we can convey feelings and nuances far beyond the power of gestures or grunts to communicate. We may assume that the first humans had more to communicate with than the gestures and grunts of non human primates¸ but it appears that articulate speech was a more recent development.



The Earliest Social Organizations




The few early sites that have been excavated show that the first phase of human evolution involved shifts in the basic patterns of subsistence and locomotion as well as new ingredients —food sharing and tool making. These led to enhanced communication ¸ information exchange¸ and economic and social insight¸ as well as cunning and restraint. Human anatomy was augmented with tools. Culture became an inseparable part of humanity ¸ and social life acquired life acquired a new¸ and yet little understood¸ complexity.

What sort of social organizations did Homo Habilis enjoy? However¸ much we look at contemporary non–humans primates ¸ we cannot be sure. Most primates are intensely social and live in groups in which the mother–infant relationship forms a central bond. The period of infants´ dependency on mothers found in¸ say chimpanzees was probably lengthened considerably with Homo Habilis. The larger brain size would mean maturity that infants were born with much smaller heads than adults¸ at an earlier stage of mental maturity. This biological reality would have had a major impact on social organizations and daily habits.

Chimpanzees have flexible¸ matriarchal social groups. They occupy a relatively small territory¸ one with sufficient vegetable resources to support a considerable population density ¦ this pattern contrasts sharply with the average hunter–gather band¸ typically a closely knit group of about 25 people of several families. The kind of systematic hunting such people engage in requires much lager territories and permits much lower densities per square kilometer or mile. The few sites that have been excavated suggest that Homo Habilis tended to live in bands that were somewhat more akin to those of modern hunter–gatherers, but in all probability their social organizations resembled more closely that of chimpanzees and baboons¸ which is very different from those of humans.

The world of Homo Habilis was much less predictable and more demanding than that of even Austalopithecus. What was it that was more complex? Why do we have to be so intelligent? Not for hunting animals or gathering food but for our interactions with other people. The increased complexity of our social interactions is likely to have been a powerful force in the evolution of the human brain. For Homo Habilis¸ the adoption of a wider based diet with a food–sharing social group would have placed much more acute demand son the ability to cope with the complex and unpredictable¸ and the brilliant technological ¸ artistic¸ and expressive skills of humankind may well be a consequence of the fact that our early ancestors had to be more and more social adept.



Summary




The story of human evolution begins with the separation of the chimpanzee and human lines from a common ¸ and as yet unknown¸ ancestor about 5 to 6 million years ago. The first hominids were tree–living¸ with long arms and legs and broad chests¸ who eventually became bipedal¸ walking on two limbs. They adapted to more open country in Africa¸ which resulted from global cooling over 4 million years ago¸ by broadening their diet to include more meat¸ and by achieving great mobility and behavioral flexibility. A small bipedal hominid named Ardipithecus ramidus is the earliest known form and flourished 4.5 million years ago in Ethiopia. A later hominid¸ Australopithecus afarensis¸ was ancestral to later hominids and flourished after 3 million years ago. Then by 3 million years ago¸ the hominid line had radiated into many forms¸ among them robust and more gracile Australopithecines and the larger–brained Homo Habilis ¸ another hominid form. Homo Habiliswas a forager who also scavenged game meat and perhaps hunted. These hominids used a simple stone technology ¸ had some ability to communicate¸ and had a very rudimentary social organization. New definitions of the genus Homo make a major distinction between the more ape–like hominids described later on¸ which flourished before 2 million years ago¸ and the true humans¸ beginning with Homo Erectus¸ which evolved 1.9 millions years ago.

back

Home