Six million years is a vast span of time. In order to begin to comprehend it¸ to grasp its salient pattern of events¸ it helps to think of those events as constituting a play¸a drama of our past. A very special play¸ for no one wrote the script six million years of improvising. Our ancestors are the actors¸ their tools are the props and the incessant changes of environment through which they lived the changes of scenery, but as a play do not think of it as a “whodunit¸” in which action and ending are all. Fore we already know the ending–we are living it. The�Stone Age actors all died out leaving just one single survivor¸ Homo sapiens sapiens. Steven Mithen (1996¸ p.17).
T he Home page for this site informs the reader about the great discovery in the Valley of the Kings¸ and a typical ancient myth about the creation of the planet. The rest of the chapter will explain the history of history IE how we come to the conclusions that inform us about our ancient past. Information is always changing. At the beginning of the 20th century Egypt was the oldest known civilization. Then by the 1920´s discoveries in the land between the rivers changed that. Who knows what new discoveries will change how we look at our ancient past and ourselves.
A
ll human societies have an interest in the past. It is always around them, haunting mystifying, tantalizing, somethimes offering potentiall lessons for the present and future. The past is important because social life unfolds through time, embedded within a frameowrk of cultural expectations and values. In the high Arttic, Inuit preserve their tradioional attitudes, skills and coping mechanisms in some of the harshest environments on earth. They do this by incorporating the lessons of the past into the present. In many societies, the ancestors are the guardians of the land, which sybolizes present, past, and future.We may all share an interest in the past, but we think of it, and use it, in different ways, just as we have different perspectives on time.
While it is true that archaeology is the only method Western science has of studying cultural change through time, that does not give archaeologists unique authority over the past. In many societies, history is a valued cultural commodity, in ways that are fundamentally different from those of the archaeologist. The transmission of knowledge about ancient times lies in the hands of respected elders, who take pains to preserve the accuracy of oral traditions. Such traditions are of vital importance, and they are carefully controlled, for they define and preserve a group's identity from one generation to tne next. The past is vested not in science, but in household, community, kin groups, and territory.
Among the Yolngu Aborigines of Australia's Northern Territory, for example, only the oldest clan members aare repositories for the most important historical knowledge. As both Australian Aborigines and Native Americans have pointed out, there is a fundamental incompamental between Western science and its prespectives on the past and those of other societies. In part, this incompatibility revolves around the nothion of linear time.
Westerns think of the passage of the human experience along a straight, if branching, highway of time. The great nineteenth-century German statesman Otto von Bismark called this the "stream of time," upon which all human societies ride for a time. We have a sense of linear, unraveling history that goes back through 5000 years of recorded history to early Egypt and Mesopotamia. Ancient Egypitian civilization began in 3100 B.C.E.; Rome was founded 753 B.C.E.; Christopher Columbus landed in the Bahamas on October 12, 1492; and teh Declaration of Independence dates to July 4, 1776. These are landmarks along the ladder of historical chronology, which continues to unfold inexorably every day, month, and year, as we live out lives.
An unfolding, linear past is not the only way of conceptualizing ancient times. Many non-western societies, ancient and modern, think of time as a cyclical phenomenon, or sometimes as a combination of the linear and the cyclical. The cyclical perspective stems from the passage of seaons and of heavenly bodies, from the close relationships between foragers and village farmers and their natural environments.