Easysurf | Home | Site Map |
---|
Text Size increase decrease |
---|
Who arrested Jesus?
From the Letter of the Emperor to all those not present at the Council.
(Found in Eusebius, Vita Const., Lib. iii., 18-20.)
When the question relative to the sacred festival of Easter arose, it was universally thought that it would be convenient that all should keep the feast on one day; for what could be more beautiful and more desirable, than to see this festival, through which we receive the hope of immortality, celebrated by all with one accord, and in the same manner? It was declared to be particularly unworthy for this, the holiest of all festivals, to follow the custom [the calculation] of the Jews, who had soiled their hands with the most fearful of crimes, and whose minds were blinded. In rejecting their custom, we may transmit to our descendants the legitimate mode of celebrating Easter, which we have observed from the time of the Saviour's Passion to the present day [according to the day of the week]. We ought not, therefore, to have anything in common with the Jews, for the Saviour has shown us another way; our worship follows a more legitimate and more convenient course (the order of the days of the week); and consequently, in unanimously adopting this mode, we desire, dearest brethren, to separate ourselves from the detestable company of the Jews, for it is truly shameful for us to hear them boast that without their direction we could not keep this feast. How can they be in the right, they who, after the death of the Saviour, have no longer been led by reason but by wild violence, as their delusion may urge them? They do not possess the truth in this Easter question; for, in their blindness and repugnance to all improvements, they frequently celebrate two passovers in the same year. We could not imitate those who are openly in error. How, then, could we follow these Jews, who are most certainly blinded by error? for to celebrate the passover twice in one year is totally inadmissible. But even if this were not so, it would still be your duty not to tarnish your soul by communications with such wicked people [the Jews]. Besides, consider well, that in such an important matter, and on a subject of such great solemnity, there ought not to be any division. Our Saviour has left us only one festal day of our redemption, that is to say, of his holy passion, and he desired [to establish] only one Catholic Church. Think, then, how unseemly it is, that on the same day some should be fasting whilst others are seated at a banquet; and that after Easter, some should be rejoicing at feasts, whilst others are still observing a strict fast. For this reason, a Divine Providence wills that this custom should be rectified and regulated in a uniform way; and everyone, I hope, will agree upon this point. As, on the one hand, it is our duty not to have anything in common with the murderers of our Lord; and as, on the other, the custom now followed by the Churches of the West, of the South, and of the North, and by some of those of the East, is the most acceptable, it has appeared good to all; and I have been guarantee for your consent, that you would accept it with joy, as it is followed at Rome, in Africa, in all Italy, Egypt, Spain, Gaul, Britain, Libya, in all Achaia, and in the dioceses of Asia, of Pontus, and Cilicia. You should consider not only that the number of churches in these provinces make a majority, but also that it is right to demand what our reason approves, and that we should have nothing in common with the Jews. To sum up in few words: By the unanimous judgment of all, it has been decided that the most holy festival of Easter should be everywhere celebrated on one and the same day, and it is not seemly that in so holy a thing there should be any division. As this is the state of the case, accept joyfully the divine favour, and this truly divine command; for all which takes place in assemblies of the bishops ought to be regarded as proceeding from the will of God. Make known to your brethren what has been decreed, keep this most holy day according to the prescribed mode; we can thus celebrate this holy Easter day at the same time, if it is granted me, as I desire, to unite myself with you; we can rejoice together, seeing that the divine power has made use of our instrumentality for destroying the evil designs of the devil, and thus causing faith, peace, and unity to flourish amongst us. May God graciously protect you, my beloved brethren.
The book of Exodus [30: 13] commands every adult male Jew to contribute exactly one half Shekel each year to the Temple. No foreign or Roman money could be accepted to pay for this Temple Tax. It was necessary to exchange foreign money for the half shekel before it could be contributed to the Temple.Oral Tradition of the Gospels
On the first day of the final month of the year, called Adar, announcements would inform the people that the annual collection of half-shekel coins was about to commence. This announcement would give the people one month to contribute before the moneys would be expended from the Temple treasury, on the first day of Nissan, the first month of the new year. Only money collected in the previous Adar could be used to pay for sacrifices for the new (next) year.
The half shekel (given annually by every Jewish male over the age of twenty women and children were not required to pay the tax, however their money was accepted if they offered it.) contributions were pooled to purchase the congregational sacrifices offered every day of the year (sacrificial slaughter of animals). Starting from the first day of the month of Nissan (the name of a Jewish month that followed Adar), only sacrifices purchased with the new yearly contributions could be offered for that year.
The rich were not allowed to give more, and the poor could not give less. A half-shekel was an insufficient sum of money to pay for even one sacrifice. However by pooling the money of all the congregations, the Temple was able to conduct sacrificial rituals and ceremonies throughout the year.
There were two ways in which the money was collected. On the 15th of Adar, Temple messengers would arrive in the towns of ancient Israel, to collect donations and change different types of currencies. Only the holy shekel could be used to pay the tax. This is the way Jesus paid the temple tax [Matt. 17:24-27].
The second way.
On the fifteenth of Adar, the money-changers set up their tables in Jerusalem for the purpose of exchanging foreign moneys for the coin, the Shekel, in which the tax was payable. Jews of the diaspora, Jewish pilgrims who lived outside of ancient Israel and in the Roman, Empire would bring their congregation's collection to pay the Temple Tax. The Jews of the diaspora who lived under Roman rule enjoyed special privileges (freedom to practice their religion) and the protection of the Roman empire.( These special privileges had been secured by Herod.) They viewed the repeated Jewish rebellions against Roman rule a threat to their protected status. They supported the collaboration of the High-Priest with the Roman authorities.
The money changers were performing a required religious service. The Gospels turned this into a blueprint for future anti-Semitic attacks.
Did Jesus of Nazareth attack the money changers?
The Gospels [Matthew 21:12, Mark 11:15, Luke 19:45, John 2:14-15] claim that Jesus of Nazareth attacked the money changers.
If the Last Supper was on the first night of Passover, it occurred on the 14th of Nissan.
Palm Sunday would have been on the 10th of Nissan.
If Jesus of Nazareth entered Jerusalem on the 10th of Nissan, the money changers would have folded their tables and stopped exchanging foreign money for the half-shekel ten days before Palm Sunday.
Did Jesus of Nazareth attack the money changers or the Roman appointed High-Priest which would have been an act of rebellion that merited crucifixion.
Bart D. Ehrman in Jesus, Interrupted brilliantly explains the impact of oral tradition on the Gospels.
Below is a summary.
Early followers of Jesus would tell each other stories about Jesus. Each time a story was retold there would be minor alterations. Jesus followers would also tell these stories to people who were not members of the Jesus Movement in the hope that would they join the Jesus Movement. These new members of the Jesus Movement would retell the stories they had heard. When they retold the stories, they would tell them from their own perspective adding or eliminating elements of the stories.
Jewish members of the Jesus Movement, who had been expelled from their local synagogue, would add anti-Jewish elements to the Jesus stories.
When the writers of the Gospels started to write these stories down, they had to translate the stories from Aramaic to Greek. This resulted in even greater alterations. The Greek writers interpreted the Jesus stories from their background of Greek Mythology. Over the years, scribes would copy and recopy the Gospels. The scribes would add and remove elements to make the stories support their own community's needs. New interpretations, errors and misspellings had their own consequences.
This is how a Jewish preacher in the year A.D. 30 was declared divine in A.D. 325.
Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them) Bart D. Ehrman
The Jesus Papers: Exposing the Greatest Cover-Up in History Michael Baigent
A History of the Jews Paul M. Johnson
The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity Hyam Maccoby
Jesus the Pharisee Hyam Maccoby
Why the Jews Rejected Jesus: The Turning Point in Western History David Klinghoffer
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why Bart D. Ehrman
AskWhy! on Origins of Christianity in the Essenes - Christianity Revealed
Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series II, Vol. XIV
Jewish persecution: 70 to 1200 CE
Who Really Killed Jesus? by Tim Callahan
Click here to add this page to your list of Favorites |