
Old, wise healing women were particular targets for witch-hunters. "At this day,"
wrote Reginald Scot in 1584, "it is indifferent to say in the English tongue, 'she is a
witch' or 'she is a wise woman.'" Common people of pre-reformational
Europe relied upon wise women and men for the treatment of illness rather than
upon churchmen, monks or physicians. Robert Burton wrote in 1621:
Sorcerers are too common; cunning men, wizards and white
witches, as they call them, in every village, which, if they be sought
unto, will help almost all infirmities of body and mind.
By combining their knowledge of medicinal herbs with an entreaty for divine
assistance, these healers provided both more affordable and most often more
effective medicine than was available elsewhere. Churchmen of the Reformation
objected to the magical nature of this sort of healing, to the preference people had
for it over the healing that the Church or Church- licensed physicians offered, and
to the power that it gave women.
Until the terror of the witch hunts, most people did not understand why successful
healers should be considered evil. "Men rather uphold them," wrote John Stearne,
"and say why should any man be questioned for doing good." As a
Bridgettine monk of the early sixteenth century recounted of "the simple people",
"I have heard them say full often myself... 'Sir, we mean well and do believe well
and we think it a good and charitable deed to heal a sick person or a sick
beast'..." And in 1555 Joan Tyrry asserted that "her doings in healing of man
and beast, by the power of God taught to her by the... fairies, be both godly and
good..."
Indeed, the very invocations used by wise women sound quite Christian. For
example, a 1610 poem recited when picking the herb vervain, also known as St.
Johnswort, reads,
Hallowed be thou Vervain, as thou growest on the ground / For in
the mount of Calvary there thou was first found / Thou healest our
Saviour, Jesus Christ, and staunchest his bleeding wound / In the
name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost / I take thee from
the ground.
But in the eyes of orthodox Christians, such healing empowered people to
determine the course of their lives instead of submitting helplessly to the will of
God. According to churchmen, health should come from God, not from the efforts
of human beings. Bishop Hall said, "we that have no power to bid must
pray..." Ecclesiastical courts made the customers of witches publicly confess
to being "heartily sorry for seeking man's help, and refusing the help of
God..." An Elizabethan preacher explained that any healing "is not done by
conjuration or divination, as Popish priests profess and practice, but by entreating
the Lord humbly in fasting and prayer..." And according to Calvin, no
medicine could change the course of events which had already been determined
by the Almighty.
Preachers and Church-licensed male physicians tried to fill the function of healer.
Yet, their ministrations were often considered ineffective compared to those of a
wise woman. The keeper of the Canterbury gaol admitted to freeing an
imprisoned wise woman in 1570 because "the witch did more good by her physic
than Mr. Pudall and Mr. Wood, being preachers of God's word..." A
character in the 1593 Dialogue concerning Witches said of a local wise woman
that, "she doeth more good in one year than all these scripture men will do so long
as they live..."
Even the Church-licensed male physicians, who relied upon purgings, bleedings,
fumigations, leeches, lancets and toxic chemicals such as mercury were little match
for an experienced wise woman's knowledge of herbs. As the well-known
physician, Paracelsus, asked, "...does not the old nurse very often beat the
doctor?" Even Francis Bacon, who demonstrated very little respect for
women, thought that "empirics and old women" were "more happy many times in
their cures than learned physicians..."
Physicians often attributed their own incompetence to witchcraft. As Thomas Ady
wrote:
The reason is ignorantiae pallium maleficium et incantatio- a
cloak for a physician's ignorance. When he cannot find the nature of
the disease, he saith the party is bewitched.
When an illness could not be understood, even the highest body of England, the
Royal College of Physicians of London, was known to accept the explanation of
witchcraft.
Not surprisingly, churchmen portrayed the healing woman as the most evil of all
witches. William Perkins declared, The most horrible and detestable monster... is
the good witch. The Church included in its definition of witchcraft anyone
with knowledge of herbs for "those who used herbs for cures did so only through
a pact with the Devil, either explicit or implicit." Medicine had long been
associated with herbs and magic. The Greek and Latin words for medicine,
"pharmakeia" and "veneficium," meant both "magic" and "drugs." Mere
possession of herbal oils or ointments became grounds for accusation of
witchcraft.



SO MOTE IT BE!