|
|
|
|
Chandra Vidya, Is it already two days since you
wrote!? I would like to address only one point of the many
you raised. You
wrote: I understand these sentences as being that the priest - rather his straying - has been re-covered, after his death. Hence there is no reason for the sign anymore. And the sentence: "The drapery consisted mainly of children's bootees and umbrellas ..." means for me that the church (the drapery) dealt mostly with innocent people whose minds were like those of children. "I mean the boy knowing very well the implication of breaking the chalice broke it ." I tend to think that the breaking of the chalice was an accident, only after it happened the implications were clear. Apart from my interpretations, I think that each of us see and interpret things differently. It is all relative like those sentences from Kenu Rinpoche which I had posted last Sunday. Your interpretation is as valid as mine. Actually I wanted to reinterpret the story from a totally different point of view. Will do so before the week ends. |
|
|
|
|