Subject: [evol-psych] Re: Richard Dawkins: Our big brains can overcome our selfish genes Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:00:14 -0500 From: Tom SchoenemannTo: [email protected] References: 1 >Dawkins wrote: >If any species in the history of life has the possibility of breaking >away from short-term Darwinian selfishness and of planning for the >distant future, it is our species. We are earth's last best hope ... > >------------------- > >The irony of it all is that Darwin himself was no proponent of >"short-term Darwinian selfishness." It is Dawkins' (and T. H. >Huxley's) cardboard version of Darwinism that is the problem. > >Dawkins is going around saying that we can break with Darwin, that we >should get rid of (some of) our biological heritage, whereas Darwin >himself was adamant, in "The Descent of Man," that human kindness and >morality belonged within an evolutionary framework. Instead of >ascribing these and other enlightened capacities to exterior forces - >an inherently dualistic, religious view - Darwin saw them as products >of nature. > >-- Frans de Waal Early in the _Selfish Gene_ Dawkins writes: "Be warned that if you wish, as I do, to build a society in which individuals cooperate generously and unselfishly towards a common good, you can expect little help from biological nature. Let us try to _teach_ generosity and altruism, because we are born selfish." (p. 3). But much of the book is spent explaining how altruism is actually the result of the evolutionary process (e.g., kin selection and reciprocal altruism). I think Dawkins is confusing the "selfishness" at the genetic level (which is, after all, just a metaphor), with selfishness among humans. -Tom ___________________________________________________ P. Thomas Schoenemann Assistant Professor Department of Anthropology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6398 Phone: (215) 573-7671 Fax: (215) 898-7462 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~ptschoen/