Subject:     	 Re: Q. on Penrose arg: why new *physics*?
From:         	[email protected] (JRStern)
Date: 			Wed, 06 Aug 1997 14:59:19 -0400
Message: 	5s9van$

 
 On Tue, 05 Aug 1997 22:27:40 -0400, "Phil Roberts, Jr."
  wrote:
 >JRStern wrote:
 >> ...  A truckload of
 >> compatible (and all controversial) theories do not constitute the
 >> empirical evidence you claimed, that got us going.
 >
 >Ahmen.  But then most of us are able to distinguish between
 >evidence (e.g., feelings of worthlessness) and theory (e.g.,
 >the contention that they are "caused" by too much rationality).
 
 The alternative theory being that they are caused by just enough
 rationality, of a possibly mistaken nature.

Joshua Stern
[email protected]