(27) Wheless: ". . . the Hebrew and Greek religious forgers were
so ignorant or careless of the principles of criticism, that they
'interpolated' their fraudulent new matter into old manuscripts
without taking care to erase or suppress the previous statements
glaringly contradicted by the new interpolations." The Church forgery mill did not limit itself to mere
writings but for centuries cranked out thousands of phony
"relics" of its "Lord," "Apostles"
and "Saints." The Shroud of Turin, among innumerable
others, is counted in this group."There were at least
26 'authentic' burial shrouds scattered throughout the abbeys of
Europe, of which the Shroud of Turin is just one. . . .The Shroud
of Turin is one of the many relics manufactured for profit during
the Middle Ages. Shortly after the Shroud emerged it was declared
a fake by the bishop who discovered the artist. This is verified
by recent scientific investigation which found paint in the image
areas. The Shroud of Turin is also not consistent with Gospel
accounts of Jesus' burial, which clearly refer to multiple cloths
and a separate napkin over his face." (Freethought Datasheet
#5, Atheists United) At one point, a number of
churches claimed the one foreskin of Jesus, and there were enough
splinters of the "True Cross" that Calvin said the
amount of wood would make "a full load for a good
ship." (Walker) The disgraceful list of absurdities and
frauds goes on, and, as Pope Leo X claimed, it has been
enormously profitable for the Church. And where the fraud failed,
fear and force prevailed, as millions were subjected to horrible
tortures and murders in the name of the pretended "Prince of
Peace," during an abysmally dark Age of Faith that propelled
the world into a state of ignorance.
(28)
McKlintock and Strong's Cyclop�dia of Theological
Literature.
(29)
Mangasarian. Wheless: "The fact is, that with the exception
of this one incongruous forged passage, section 3, the
wonder-mongering Josephus makes not the slightest mention of his
wonder-working fellow-countryman, Jesus the Christ - though some
score of other Joshuas, or Jesuses, are recorded by him, nor does
he mention any of his transcendent wonders."
(30)
Massey, Mangasarian, Taylor. Zealous defender of the faith
Eusebius never mentions the Tacitus passage, nor does anyone else
prior to the 15th century C.E. (Taylor)
(31)
See Taylor and Wheless for more on the fraudulent
nature of these passages. "It has always been unfailing
source of astonishment to the historical investigator of
Christian beginnings, that there is not a single word from the
pen of any Pagan writer of the first century of our era, which
can in any fashion be referred to the marvellous story recounted
by the Gospel writer. The very existence of Jesus seems
unknown." (Mead, Did Jesus Live 100 B.C.?)
(32)
Gnostic and Historic Christianity by Massey (see below).
See also The Diegesis by Rev. Robert Taylor, The
World's Sixteen Crucified Saviors by Kersey Graves, Pagan
Christs by JM Robertson, any works by Hilton Hotema, Pagan
and Christian Creeds by Edward Carpenter, and Deceptions
and Myths of the Bible by Lloyd Graham. Although some
historicizers may glob onto these dates as proof that the
research is outdated, this is simply not true. These numbers are
provided here to demonstrate that this truth has been known, and
has been suppressed by vested interests, for a long time.
(33)
Graves, p. 15. "'We cannot,' says the celebrated
Orientalist, Sir William Jones, 'refuse to the Vedas the honor of
an antiquity the most distant.'" (Jacolliot, The Bible
in India) Indeed, certain scholars have opined that the Rig
Veda contains mention of an astronomical configuration that could
only have occurred 90,000 years ago; it true, this would attest
that the Veda was recording the experience of someone far too
advanced for that period, according to the standardized
anthrolopogical perspective, not to mention that the Veda would
represent the world's oldest "historical" recording,
although the actual physically extant copies are, obviously, very
recent. Ancient scribes India mostly used, as occurs in some
places today, leaves to write on, and these were endlessly copied
over the thousands of years. As everywhere, knowledge was also
passed along orally. This subject opens up the debate as to
whether ancient India or Egypt was the progenitor of Western and
Middle Eastern culture. Both have claims to extreme antiquity.
The question is who came first within the Mythos, Brahma-Krishna
or Osiris-Horus? Based on linguistical evidence, many scholars
have concluded it was India. However, the ancient Egyptian
language is not fully known, nor has the extent of its influence
been adequately examined. Walker hypothesizes that
"Horus" was "Heruka" of India, indicating
that the Horus myth succeeded and was built upon the Indian. The
chronology of the Brahmins goes back millions of years, and there
has been effort made by such Hare Krishna authors as Thompson and
Cremo to push civilization, rather than man's apelike
progenitors, back at least to that period. Obviously, such
"Forbidden Archeology" is widely dismissed for seeming
lack of solid evidence. What is known is that the Judeo-Christian
bible can be found in earlier versions in both countries. Thus,
it is the rehash of the well-developed systems and ideologies
(Ritual and Mythos) of both nations. (See Jacolliot and Massey.)
(33a)
Many on this list come from The World's Sixteen Crucified
Saviors by Graves. This is not to suggest that all of these
godmen characters were utilized in the formation of the Christian
myth, as overt contact had not occurred in such places as Mexico
or Bermuda. Also, modern orthodoxy does not allow for the dates
provided by Graves, i.e., that Quetzalcoatl originates in the 6th
B.C.E., a date far too early in the orthodox perspective.
However, we utilize this list to demonstrate that the same
concepts are found worldwide with and without cultural
exchange, because they are derived from the same astrotheological
observations. Also, we are in concurrence with the "ancient
advanced civilization" theory ("Atlantis") that
would allow for one or more centralized civilizations to have
spread throughout the world during a very remote period in
protohistory, thus taking with it the well-developed Mythos and
Ritual, which would then mutate into the various forms found
around the globe.
(34)
Taylor quotes the letter of Emperor Adrian (134 C.E.): "The
worshippers of Serapis are Christians, and those are devoted to
the God Serapis, who (I find) call themselves the
bishops of Christ."
(35)
Walker: ". . . Later, an unknown Gospel writer inserted the
story of doubting Thomas, who insisted on touching Jesus. This
was to combat the heretical idea that there was no resurrection
in the flesh, and also to subordinate Jerusalem's municipal god
Tammuz (Thomas) to the new savior. Actually, the most likely
source of primary Christian mythology was the Tammuz cult in
Jerusalem." The "doubting Thomas" character also
finds its place in the Mythos, as the "genius" of the
time when the sun is at its weakest (winter solstice). (Taylor)
(36)
The Sibylline Oracles, books produced over time allegedly by a
number of pagan prophetesses called Sibyls, were widely regarded
in the ancient world prior to the advent of the Christian era.
"The Sibyls are quoted frequently by the early Fathers and
Christian writers, Justin, Athenagoras, Theophilus, Clement of
Alexandria, etc." (Catholic Encyclopedia, cited by
Wheless) These books or Oracles were often cited by Christians as
proof of their religion. For instance, the following is
considered a Sibylline Oracle: "With five loaves at the same
time, and with two fishes, He shall satisfy five thousand men in
the wilderness; And afterwards taking all the fragments that
remain, He shall fill twelve baskets to the hope of many. . . .He
shall still the winds by His word, and calm the sea as it rages,
treading with feet of peace and faith. . . . He shall walk on the
waves, He shall release men from disease. He shall raise the
dead, and drive away many pains. . ." (Wheless) Although the
Christians interpreted this as a prophecy of Christ becoming
fulfilled, it is in fact an aspect of the ubiquitous Mythos and
was already said of Horus, for one, hundreds of years earlier. It
has never referred to an actual man but, once again, is
astrotheological. The fact that it purportedly existed prior to
the Christian era constitutes proof to those who use logic that
the Christians utilized it in creating their Christ character,
rather than it acting as a prophecy of their godman. As they did
with other texts, the Christians forged and interpolated many
passages into the well-known Oracles in order to cement their
fiction and convert followers. It is also amusing to note that
the Christians had to resort to despised "pagan"
documents for their enterprise, especially since they spent their
lives attempting to demonstrate that everything that preceded
them was "of the devil." This then implies that
Christianity was also a work of the devil.
(37)
Pagan Christs by JM Robertson.
(38)
In Gnostic and Historian Christianity, Massey says,
"In . . . Buddhism in Christendom, [author] Mr.
Lillie thinks he has found Jesus, the author of Christianity, as
one of the Essenes, and a Buddhist! But there is no need of
craning one's neck out of joint in looking to India, or straining
in that direction at all, for the origin of that which was
Egyptian born and Gnostic bred! Essenism was no new birth of
Hindu Buddhism brought to Alexandria about two centuries before
our era; and Christianity, whether considered to be mystical or
historical, was not derived from Buddhism at any time. They have
some things in common, because there is a Beyond to both."
We will add that the Egyptians refined the Mythos in exquisite
and overwhelming detail, but linguistical theory has in the past,
and now again with the Nostratic theory, traced the origins of
Western and Middle Eastern language and culture in large part to
India. It is yet difficult to say which came first, Krishna, the
predecessor of Buddha, or Osiris-Horus. Certainly Horus was a
well-developed savior-god by the time attributed to THE Buddha.
There would be no need to build Horus upon Buddha (Egyptian
"Putha" or "Ptah"), and it is true that
Christianity did not need to rely on the doctrines of Buddhism,
having the complete Mythos at hand. However, we do know
absolutely that there was cultural exchange between the
West/Levant and the Buddhistic world of the Far East prior to the
inception of Christianity, in the form of travelers, traders, and
monks of the vast brotherhood network, who were constantly
exchanging information concerning religion, the esoteric gnosis,
and the Mythos and Ritual. Also, it has been suggested that there
was at least one group of Brahmanic and Vedic scholars living in
the Levant prior to the founding of Christianity. These
individuals, who would likely be members of one or more aspects
of the brotherhood network, would certainly also be exchanging
information about the very ancient Krishna, et al., and
contributing to the culture around them. It is not only entirely
possible but probable that Hindus ventured to the Levant over the
millennia. But they would not have needed to, in order to spread
their version of the Mythos, since there were those, such as
Alexander the Great, who went to them. Indeed, Louis Jacolliot
expertly traces the Judeo-Christian Bible back to India, noting
many similarities between the Hindu and Christian priesthoods. (The
Bible in India) There are also quite a few similarities
between the Catholic and Tibetan Buddhist hierarchies and
rituals. The influence from the Far East has come in waves
beginning several thousand years ago, and culture may have begun
to develop there in in the protohistoric period some 12,000 years
ago or more. If the reckonings of maverick Egyptologists are
accurate, however, Egypt would have been developing
simultaneously with this Indian culture, the origins of both,
then, being a possibly much older civilization. There is no
question, however, that the archaic Indian language Sanskrit or
its Nostratic predecessor has highly influenced many of the
Western/Middle Eastern languages. Therefore, there has
unquestionably been early and ongoing contact, and with language
comes religion. "The ancient peoples of India were Asiatic
Ethiopians, and it should not surprise us that they shared common
traditions with their brothers in Africa." (John Jackson, Christianity
Before Christ)
(38a)
Mead, p. 133.
(38b)
Ibid.
(38c)
Graves, p. 118.
(39)
Isis Unveiled by Helena Blavatsky, vol. II, pp. 209,
537-538.
(40)
Massey, MC, p. 150.
(40a)
Mead, p. 134.
(41)
Walker says, "Of all savior-gods worshipped at the beginning
of the Christian era, Osiris may have contributed more details to
the evolving Christ figure than any other. Already very old in
Egypt, Osiris was identified with nearly every other Egyptian god
and was on the way to absorbing them all. He had well over 200
divine names. He was called the Lord of Lords, King of Kings, God
of Gods. He was the Resurrection and the Life, the Good Shepherd,
Eternity and Everlastingness, the god who 'made men and women to
be born again.' Budge says, 'From first to last, Osiris was to
the Egyptians the god-man who suffered, and died, and rose again,
and reigned eternally in heaven. They believed that they would
inherit eternal life, just as he had done. . . . Osiris's coming
was announced by Three Wise Men: the three stars Mintaka, Anilam,
and Alnitak in the belt of Orion, which point directly to
Osiris's star in the east, Sirius (Sothis), significator of his
birth. . . . Certainly Osiris was a prototypical Messiah, as well
as a devoured Host. His flesh was eaten in the form of communion
cakes of wheat, the 'plant of Truth.' . . . The cult of Osiris
contributed a number of ideas and phrases to the Bible. The 23rd
Psalm copied an Egyptian text appealing to Osiris the Good
Shepherd to lead the deceased to the 'green pastures' and 'still
waters' of the nefer-nefer land, to restore the soul to
the body, and to give protection in the valley of the shadow of
death (the Tuat). The Lord's Prayer was prefigured by an Egyptian
hymn to Osiris-Amen beginning. 'O Amen, O Amen, who are in
heaven.' Amen was also invoked at the end of every prayer."
(42)
The celestial manger in the Mythos is also thought of as a cave.
(Massey) Although Jesus is typically depicted as being born in a
manger, early Christian tradition places Jesus's birth in a cave,
like that of many other preceding gods. Walker: "The cave
was universally identified with the womb of Mother Earth, the
logical place for symbolic birth and regeneration. . . . Like
Adonis, Jesus was born of a consecrated temple maiden in the
sacred cave of Bethlehem, 'The House of God.'"
(43)
Massey, Churchward, et al. Massey (MC) says, ". . . the Star
in the East will afford undeniable data for showing the mythical
and celestial origin of the gospel history. When the divine child
is born, the wise men or magi declare that they have seen his
star in the east. The wise men are identified as the Three Kings
of other legends who are not to be derived from the canonical
gospels. The three kings or three solar representatives are as
ancient as the male triad that was first typified when the three
regions were established as heaven, earth, and nether-world, from
which the triad bring their gifts. . . When the birthplace was in
the sign of the Bull [6,000 years ago], the Star in the East that
arose to announce the birth of the babe was Orion, which is
therefore called the star of Horus. That was once the star of
the three kings; for the 'three kings' is still a
name of three stars in Orion's belt . . . "
(44)
Like Jesus, Horus has no history between the ages of 12 and 30.
"And the mythos alone will account for the chasm which is
wide and deep enough to engulf a supposed history of 18
years." (Massey, MC) There exists a very old Egyptian
papyrus dated to 75 C.E. but based on an older document, which
contains a story about the "Son of Osiris" (i.e., the
"Son of God") that parallels in a number of details the
gospel narratives. The Son of God is claimed to have wondrous
powers and to have outwitted all of the teachers in the Temple of
Ptah. In the papyrus is also related a tale of two dead men that
closely resembles the biblical fable of Dives and Lazarus (Lk.
16:19-31). (Mead)
(45)
Massey: "Horus in Egypt had been a fish from time
immemorial, and when the equinox entered the sign of Pisces,
Horus, was portrayed as Ichthys with the fish sign of
over his head." Dujardin: "The patriarch Joshua, who
was plainly an ancient god of Palestine and bore the same name as
the god of Christianity, is called the son of Nun, which
signifies 'son of the fish.'" Walker: "The fish symbol
of the yonic Goddess was so revered throughout the Roman empire
that Christian authorities insisted on taking it over, with
extensive revision of myths to deny its earlier female-genital
meanings." Wheless: "The fish anagram was an ancient
Pagan symbol of fecundity . . ."
(46)
Churchward, op cit., p. 365. See also The Book Your Church
Doesn't Want You to Read, pp. 15-16.
(47)
Churchward, ibid., p. 397. See also The Egyptian Book of the
Dead by Massey, pp. 13 and 64; MC.
(48)
Churchward. Massey, MC: "It was the gnostic art
that reproduced the Hathor-Meri and Horus of Egypt as the Virgin
and child-Christ of Rome . . . .You poor idiotai [idiots],
said the Gnostics [to the early Christians], you have
mistaken the mysteries of old for modern history, and accepted
literally all that was only meant mystically."
(49)
Walker: "The cave of the Vatican belonged to Mithra until
376 A.D., when a city prefect suppressed the cult of the rival
Savior and seized the shrine in the name of Christ, on the very
birthday of the pagan god, December 25." Shmuel Golding, in The
Book Your Church: "Paul says, 'They drank from that
spiritual rock and that rock was Christ' (I Cor. 10:4). These are
identical words to those found in the Mithraic scriptures, except
that the name Mithra is used instead of Christ. The Vatican hill
in Rome that is regarded as sacred to Peter, the Christian rock,
was already sacred to Mithra. Many Mithraic remains have been
found there. The merging of the worship of Attis into that of
Mithra, then later into that of Jesus, was effected almost
without interruption."
(50)
Robertson. Wheless: "Mithraism is one of the oldest
religious systems on earth, as it dates from the dawn of history
before the primitive Iranian race divided into sections which
became Persian and Indian . . . When in 65-63 B.C., the
conquering armies of Pompey were largely converted by its high
precepts, they brought it with them into the Roman Empire.
Mithraism spread with great rapidity throughout the Empire, and
it was adopted, patronized and protected by a number of the
Emperors up to the time of Constantine." Of Mithraism, the Catholic
Encyclopedia states, as related by Wheless: "The fathers
conducted the worship. The chief of the fathers, a sort of pope,
who always lived at Rome, was called 'Pater Patratus."'
(51)
Taylor: "'That Popery has borrowed its principal ceremonies
and doctrines from the rituals of Paganism,' is a fact which the
most learned and orthodox of the established church have most
strenuously maintained and most convincingly demonstrated."
� 1998 Acharya S ([email protected])
Footnote Page 3 | Back to Origins
|