The statement I wish to entertain in this page, is that since man shares X per/cent of DNA with the great apes, or Vertebrates, they must share a common ancestor. Again I take issue with something that is based in "supposition," and not fact. The "supposition" is, that shared DNA means common ancestry. It HAS NOT BEEN PROVED. It could mean SOMETHING ELSE, ENTIRELY.

Genesis the very first chapter, tells us in verse nine, that the land was separated from the waters. Now, I don't know about science, and scholarship, education and degrees, but I do know that if the dry land was separated out of the waters, and God says that is the case, then they originated in a common DNA pool.

Subsequently, EVERYTHING that follows, sequentially in creation, from land or sea, should share some DNA, as a matter of source material. So how does this "sharing of DNA" PROVE anything, other than the fact that we, along with the animal kingdom, and the plant kingdom, share, not a common ancestor, but a common creator.