BackA short narration of truth, for all my well-wishers, friends who come to this site......
              Blindness: Concepts And Misconceptions
When an person gets blind, he faces two (2) major hurdles:
1) He must learn the skills and techniques which will enable him to carry on as a normal, productive
    citizen in  the community; and ,
2) He must become aware of and learn to cope with public attitudes and misconceptions about
     blindness attitudes and misconceptions which go to the very roots of our culture and permeate
     every aspect of social behavior and thinking.

The first of these problems is far easier to solve than the second. For it is no longer theory but
established fact that, with proper training and opportunity, the average blind person can do the
average job in the average place of business and do it as well as his sighted neighbor. The blind
can function as scientists, farmers, electricians, factory workers, and skilled technicians. They
can perform as housewives, lawyers, teachers, or laborers. The skills of independent mobility,
communication, and the activities of daily living are known, available, and acquirable. Likewise,
the achievement of vocational competence poses no insurmountable barrier.

          In other words the real problem of blindness is not the blindness itself not the acquisition
of skills or techniques or competence. The real problem is the lack of understanding and the
misconceptions which exist. It is no accident that the word blind carries with it connotations of
inferiority and helplessness. In earlier times, Eyesight and the power to see were equated with
light, and light (whether daylight or firelight) meant security and safety. Blindness was equated
with darkness, and darkness meant danger and evil. The blind person could not hunt effectively
or dodge a spear. In our day, society and social values have changed. In civilized countries there
is now no great premium on dodging a spear, and hunting has dwindled to the status of an
occasional pastime.

The blind are able to compete on terms of equality in the full current of active life. The primitive
conditions of jungle and cave are gone, but the primitive attitudes about blindness remain. The
blind are thought to live in a world of darkness, and darkness is equated with evil, stupidity, sin,
and inferiority.

          Do I exaggerate? I would that it were so. Consider the very definition of the word blind, the
reflection of what it means in the language, its subtle shades and connotations. The 1962 printing of
the World Publishing Company's college edition of Webster's New World Dictionary of the American
Language defines blind as follows: without the power of sight; sightless; eyeless; lacking insight or
understanding; done without adequate directions or knowledge; as, blind search. Reckless; unreasonable;
not controlled by intelligence; as, blind destiny; insensible; drunk; illegible; indistinct. In architecture,
false, walled up, as, a blind window.
The 1960 edition of Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary says: blind. Sightless. Lacking discernment;
unable or unwilling to understand or judge; as, a blind choice. Apart from intelligent direction or control;
as, blind chance. Insensible; as, a blind stupor; hence, drunk. For sightless persons; as, a blind asylum.
Unintelligible; illegible; as, blind writing.

          There are a number of reasons why it is extremely difficult to change public attitudes about
blindness. For one thing, despite the fact that many achievements are being made by the blind and
that a good deal of constructive publicity is being given to these achievements, there are strong counter
currents of uninformed and regressive publicity and propaganda. It is hard to realize, for instance, that
anyone still exists who actually believes the blind are especially gifted in music or that they are particularly
suited to weaving or wickerwork. It is hard to realize that any well-educated person today believes that
blind people are compensated for their loss of sight by special gifts and talents. Yet, I call your attention
to a section on blindness appearing in a book on government and citizenship which is in current use in many
public high schools throughout our country. Not in some bygone generation, but today, hundreds of thousands
of ninth-grade students will study this passage:

          Many blind, deaf, and crippled people can do a considerable amount of work. The blind have
remarkable talent in piano tuning, weaving, wickerwork, and the like. The deaf and dumb are still less
handicapped because they can engage in anything that does not require taking or giving orders by voice.

          I confess to being surprised when I learned that the book containing the foregoing passage was in
general use. It occurred to me to wonder whether the text was unique or whether its enlightened views were
held by other authors in the field. The results of this investigation were not reassuring. I call your attention to
the selection on blindness appearing in another text in common use throughout the high schools of our nation.

          The blind may receive aid from the states and the federal government, if their families are not able
to keep them from want. There are over one hundred institutions for the blind in the United States, many
of which are supported wholly or partly by taxes. Sometimes it seems as if blind people are partly compensated
for their misfortune by having some of their other talents developed with exceptional keenness. Blind people
can play musical instruments as well as most of those who can see, and many activities where a keen touch
of the fingers is needed can be done by blind people wonderfully well. Schools for the blind teach their pupils
music and encourage them to take part in some of the outdoor sports that other pupils enjoy.

          In attempting to change public attitudes, not only must we overcome the effects of Webster's dictionary
and a host of textbooks, but we must take into account another factor as well. Several years ago the agency
that I head was attempting to help a young woman find employment as a secretary. She was a good typist,
could fill out forms, handle erasures, take dictation, and otherwise perform competently. She was neat in her
person and could travel independently anywhere she wanted to go. She was also totally blind. I called the
manager of a firm which I knew had a secretarial opening and asked him if he would consider interviewing the
blind person in question. He told me that he knew of the wonderful work which blind persons were doing and
that he was most sympathetic to our cause but that his particular setup would not be suitable. As he put it, Our
work is very demanding. Carbons must be used and forms must be filled out. Speed is at a premium, and a great
deal of work must be done each day. Then, there is the fact that our typewriters are quite a ways from the bathroom, and we cannot afford to use the time of another girl to take the blind person to the toilet.

If you are interested in reading more with relation to this topic please feel free to Mail me! me.

Back