Political fragmentation of societies is becoming more obvious and as extremes of weather, financial conditions, physical health, mental stress and psychic phenomena strain bodies and minds, more and more are turning, ever so inexorably, to the questions formulating in their minds of "What is this? What is going on?" No matter where they go for answers, be it in religious dogma, science, New Age, etc., sooner or later all the answers provided by those venues will be seen to be false, and the reality of this information we provide will hit them. Those of Darkness will feel like the weight of a ton of bricks hitting their minds and spirits, for they will realize they are ultimately accountable for their despicable actions. And they will fragment with the gloom of doom and fear of the damned, even as those of Light, shrugging off the programmed fears and doubts feel joy at the thought of being liberated from this Hell-hole. It is also even more obvious that the energy of our information is polarizing minds and spirits as never before, and that the separation of the wheat from the chaff, as prophesied by many to occur at the end time, is a self-evident truth.

Those who want to dismiss these writings, and their energy, dismiss me and my message, must answer these pertinent questions: "What other energy could do this? What other energy could expose and crush Evil as this does? What other energy could fill trapped True Beings with understanding and the True Joy of Liberation and the felicity of True Awareness?" Indeed only the Christ energy could do such a thing. Inspite of rejection of this information by the evil ones, in the end all will accept this concept as an infallible truth and the evil ones will shrink into the gloom of defeat to await transmutation, for they will have realized there is no place for their ilk in the New Energy Dimensions. This message is of Joy and Love to those of Love and Light. It is harsh to those of evil and its maliciousness for, like a mirror, it reflects the ontology of the spirit within readers. This information is purposely confrontational in order to perform the necessary separation of viables from non-viables, giving no quarter for retreat to those of Darkness. There is no compromise. There are no more chances. It is a statement of finality and as such there can be no second thoughts. While those of evil may make the spurious charge that this is unloving and unfair, that is not the case at all. Their silly complaints are countered by the experience of True Beings who find immense Light and Love in these words. The whining failed beings have always begged for compassion and forgiveness which they have squandered on innumerable occasions. No there are no more occasions. It is over. It is final, and the decision for their eradication has been made. There is no simple or wishy-washy way of saying this. Having failed, they have only themselves to blame for squandering those almost infinite number of chances.

FROM THE NEWS

Religious Hypocrisy

On July 17, a California jury ordered the Catholic diocese to pay $30 million to two young men who endured years of sexual abuse by a priest. The verdict represented the second largest cash penalty ever imposed against the Catholic church in a sex abuse case, topped only by the $120 million in damages ordered last year against the diocese of Dallas. The jury determined that the diocese was liable for negligence. $6 million were awarded in actual damages and $24 million in punitive damages. Bishop D. Montrose of Stockton issued a statement begging forgiveness, but also expressed disappointment at the size of the damages, which he said would bankrupt the diocese. "We are disappointed with the jury's decision to punish the diocese in a way which will effectively destroy virtually all of the services provided by the diocese to its people and the community," Montrose said. The convicted priest, O'Grady, who admitted molesting the boys in a 1993 criminal trial, is currently serving a 14-year prison term at the Mud Creek State Penitentiary in Ione, California. Lawyers and supporters of the victims, the Howards, said the whopping punitive damage award -- one of the largest ever made against the Church in a sexual abuse case -- showed that jury members believed Church authorities knew the abuse was taking place. "For at least 17 years, innocent children were traumatized because top church officials wouldn't tell parents or police about this paedophile priest," said David Clohessy of SNAP (Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests), a group dedicated to exposing sex abuse in the church. "The level of corruption may be mind-boggling to some, but thankfully not to the jury and victims who spent years trying to get justice and protect others." The star witness at the Stockton trial was Cardinal Roger Mahoney, the highest-ranking cleric ever to testify at a U.S. sex abuse case, who was Bishop of Stockton from 1980 to 1985. Mahoney, now archbishop of Los Angeles, repeatedly denied that O'Grady was known to be a child molester. "This jury found that each and every bishop that served here knew, and each and every bishop that testified here lied," said Jeff Anderson, lead attorney for the plaintiffs. "The message here is stop the cover up, stop the denial. I really, truly believe that this has to be heard." O'Grady and his pastor in 1974 wrote apology letters to the parents of a 14-year old girl in Lodi, California, he admitted having molested. Another probe of O'Grady in 1984 was stopped after a church lawyer assured police that he had not committed any new offenses and was being kept away from children. In their criminal case, the Howard brothers said O'Grady began abusing them beginning in the late 1970s. Two older Howard siblings, brother Dan and sister Cristin, also claim O'Grady molested them but their suits against the diocese were thrown out because the statute of limitations had expired. A total of six civil suits filed by other alleged victims against O'Grady have been settled. Earlier this month, the Roman Catholic diocese of Dallas settled its landmark sex abuse case by agreeing to pay a record $30.9 million to 12 former altar boys who were repeatedly assaulted by a priest on church property.

A Dallas jury last year ordered the church to pay $119.6 million to the boys abused by the Rev. Rudolph Kos on hundreds of occasions between 1981 and 1992, but the diocese said that ruling would force it into bankruptcy so both sides negotiated a smaller package. Tom Economus, a Catholic priest who heads Linkup, a Chicago-based support group for victims of clergy abuse, said the Catholic church has paid about $800 million to settle sex abuse cases in the United States since 1985.

My comments: It would not be too hard to believe the bishops colluded to lie and cover-up the nefarious activities of many priests in this religious institution which is all about power and money. If you have not read our book "Making Sense of the Madness, Volume 3, `Death of an Evil God'", I suggest you do so now, for it exposes the evilness of the Catholic Church and so-called Christianity (which has nothing to do with Jesus Christ) throughout the ages. Indeed this is the tip of the iceberg of the church's corruption. On course, the church hierarchy would say the odd "bad apple exists in all institutions". But if you know even a little of the history of the church, and know how its founding fathers such as Jerome, Iraneus, Augustine of Hippo, and others who came later, such as Thomas Aquinas, lied, lusted and cheated, you will know their excuses ring hollow. These successful court cases against the clergy are a small but very relevant sign indicating the exposure of the evil essence of the institution on the spiritual plane, and as such are of immense significance, as are the obvious exposure of individuals such as Bill Clinton, Margaret Thatcher, George Bush, etc., etc.

Everywhere we turn our attention, we see exposure of corruptive, deceitful, immoral and illegal practices. This is so in religious institutions, in governments, in business, in industry, in the Armed Services, the media, the entertainment industry and so on. The significance of this should be obvious to you. The infrastructure of evil which has allowed these nefarious processes for so long is fracturing, allowing the exposure and the full realization by awakened ones of the evil basis of this plane. Once exposed, the archons (both robots and demons) have nowhere to hide to repeat their performances, hence the evil energy patterns they weaved to hold the system together weaken. This allows the True Beings caught by them to awaken even more, to see who is who and to escape the traps if they are in traps. Hence, do not underestimate the relevance of this exposure of evil we see everywhere, and do not think it is just the way things are and that they will continue as before. The fact is, nothing is continuing as before and measures used to cover up the Darkness of the plane are simply no longer working. Expect more exposures, more fracturing and more acceleration towards total collapse of all systems as we have predicted.

THE CIA AND DRUGS - from Conspiracy Nation. From a Press release on upcoming book by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair. "White-Out": On March 18, 1998, the CIA's Inspector General, Fred Hitz, finally let the cat out of the bag in an aside at a Congressional hearing. Hitz told the astounded US Reps that the CIA had maintained relationships with companies and individuals that the Agency knew to be involved in the drug business. Even more astonishingly, Hitz revealed that back in 1982 the CIA had requested and received from Reagan's Justice Department clearance not to report any knowledge it might have of drug-dealing by CIA assets. With these two admissions Hitz definitively sank many years' worth of CIA denials, much of it under oath to Congress. Hitz's admissions also made fools of some of the most prominent names in US journalism, and vindicated investigators and critics of the Agency, ranging from Al McCoy to Gary Webb. The involvement of the CIA with drug traffickers is a story that has slouched into the limelight every decade or so since the creation of the Agency. Most recently, in 1996, the San Jose Mercury News published a sensational series on the topic, "Dark Alliance", and then helped destroy its own reporter, Gary Webb. In "White-Out", Cockburn and St. Clair at last put the whole story together, from the earliest days, when the CIA's institutional ancestors, the OSS and the Office of Naval Intelligence, cut a deal with America's premier gangster and drug trafficker, Lucky Luciano. They show that many of even the most seemingly outlandish charges leveled against the Agency have a basis in truth. After Webb's series, for example, outraged black communities charged that the CIA had undertaken a program, stretching across many years, of experiments on minorities. Cockburn and St. Clair show how the CIA imported Nazi scientists straight from their labs at Dachau and Buchenwald and set them to work, developing chemical and biological agents, tested on blacks, some of them in mental hospitals. Cockburn and St. Clair show how the CIA's complicity with drug-dealing criminal gangs was part and parcel of its attacks on labor organizers, whether on the New York docks, or on the docks of Marseilles and Shanghai. They trace how the Cold War and counter-insurgency led to an alliance between the Agency and the vilest of war criminals like Klaus Barbie, or fanatic opium traders like the mujahedin in Afghanistan. "White-Out" is a thrilling history that stretches from Sicily in 1944 to the killing fields of Laos and Vietnam, to CIA safe houses in Greenwich Village and San Francisco where CIA men watched Agency-paid prostitutes feed LSD to unsuspecting clients. We meet Oliver North, as he plotted with Manuel Noriega and Central American gangsters. We travel to little-known airports in Costa Rica and Arkansas, hear from drug pilots and accountants from the Cali Cartel, learn of DEA agents whose careers were ruined because they tried to tell the truth.

The CIA, drugs and ... the press. Cockburn and St. Clair dissect the shameful way American journalists have not only turned a blind eye to the Agency's misdeeds, but helped plunge the knife into those who tried to tell the truth. Here at last is the full story. "White-Out" is a richly detailed excavation of the CIA's dirtiest secrets. For anyone who wants to know the truth about what the Agency has really been about, this is the book to start with.

The US in an ultimate act of hypocrisy decided not to join the newly created war crimes court, after failing to reach an agreement whereby no American could be tried by the court! Could its motivations be any more shallow or apparent, in its failed attempt to use the war crimes court to distract attention from its own illegal, immoral acts and war crimes?

War crimes court created, U.S. won't join

ROME (Reuters) - The dream of creating a world court to try war crimes became reality Saturday even though the United States said it could not join and would have to remain vigilant about its commitments on the world stage. In a cliffhanger finale to a U.N. conference, chief U.S. delegate David Scheffer made a last-ditch attempt to rewrite the statute to assuage fears that U.S. troops could be tried in a "kangaroo court." The bid backfired spectacularly when delegates, voting on Friday night at the end of a five-week conference, threw out U.S. amendments by an overwhelming 113-17 majority, dealing the world's sole superpower a stinging slap in the face. U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan was due to attend a signing ceremony at 4.00 p.m. (1400 GMT) on Saturday at the site of the ancient Roman Capitol. Washington was isolated among the majority of its democratic allies in opposing the International Criminal Court (ICC), which was heralded from Britain to Australia. Despite [some] reservations, the plenary session approved by 120 votes to seven, with 21 abstentions, the creation of the court to try genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and aggression once that offense is satisfactorily defined. Delegates said U.S. officials negotiated hard for an elusive agreement. Scheffer said he had fervently hoped that the U.S. could have given its backing. "The United States is a leader in promoting international justice and it is truly tragic that we reached a juncture today where our desire ... to be an engine of this court has been derailed," Scheffer told reporters.

A senior administration official said the fact that the United States had been unable to negotiate a cast-iron guarantee against trials for Americans meant Washington would have to think very seriously about its international troop commitments.

My Comments: Is it not obvious that the USA is losing control and power?? It can no longer assume the unchallenged role of World's bully and can no longer assume it can get its way. As it weakens those who hang to its tail, like Israel, also weaken inexorably.

Pursuant to the war crimes news item: Noam Chomsky on what constitutes a "Rogue State" -- defying international law:

The U.S. proceeded to define "aggression" to include "political warfare, or subversion" (by someone else, that is) - what Adlai Stevenson called "internal aggression" while defending JFK's escalation to a full-scale attack against South Vietnam. When the U.S. bombed Libyan cities in 1986, the official justification was "self defense against future attack." New York Times legal specialist Anthony Lewis praised the Administration for relying "on a legal argument that violence [in this case] is justified as an act of self-defense," under this creative interpretation of Article 51 of the Charter, which would have embarrassed a literate high school student. The U.S. invasion of Panama was defended in the Security Council by Ambassador Thomas Pickering by appeal to Article 51, which, he declared, "provides for the use of armed force to defend a country, to defend our interests and our people," and entitles the U.S. to invade Panama to prevent its "territory from being used as a base for smuggling drugs into the United States." Educated opinion nodded sagely in assent. In June 1993, Clinton ordered a missile attack on Iraq, killing civilians and greatly cheering the president, congressional doves, and the press, who found the attack "appropriate, reasonable and necessary." Commentators were particularly impressed by Ambassador Albright's appeal to Article 51. The bombing, she explained, was in "self-defense against armed attack"_namely, an alleged attempt to assassinate former president Bush two months earlier, an appeal that would have scarcely risen to the level of absurdity even if the U.S. had been able to demonstrate Iraqi involvement; "Administration officials, speaking anonymously," informed the press "that the judgment of Iraq's guilt was based on circumstantial evidence and analysis rather than ironclad intelligence," the New York Times reported, dismissing the matter. The press assured elite opinion that the circumstances "plainly fit" Article 51 (Washington Post). "Any President has a duty to use military force to protect the nation's interests" (New York Times, while expressing some scepticism about the case in hand). "Diplomatically, this was the proper rationale to invoke," and "Clinton's reference to the UN charter conveyed an American desire to respect international law" (Boston Globe). Article 51 "permits states to respond militarily if they are threatened by a hostile power" (Christian Science Monitor). Article 51 entitles a state to use force "in self-defence against threats to one's nationals," British Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd instructed Parliament, supporting Clinton's "justified and proportionate exercise of the right of self-defence." There would be a "dangerous state of paralysis" in the world, Hurd continued, if the U.S. were required to gain Security Council approval before launching missiles against an enemy that might - or might not - have ordered a failed attempt to kill an ex-President two months earlier. The record lends considerable support to the concern widely voiced about "rogue states" that are dedicated to the rule of force, acting in the "national interest" as defined by domestic power; most ominously, rogue states that anoint themselves global judge and executioner. The concept "rogue state" is highly nuanced. Thus Cuba qualifies as a leading "rogue state" because of its alleged involvement in international terrorism, but the U.S. does not fall into the category despite its terrorist attacks against Cuba for close to 40 years, apparently continuing through last summer according to important investigative reporting of the Miami Herald, which failed to reach the national press (here; it did in Europe). Cuba was a "rogue state" when its military forces were in Angola, backing the government against South African attacks supported by the U.S. South Africa, in contrast, was not a rogue state then, nor during the Reagan years, when it caused over $60 billion in damage and 1.5 million deaths in neighboring states according to a UN Commission, not to speak of some events at home - and with ample U.S./UK support. The same exemption applies to Indonesia and many others. The criteria are fairly clear: a "rogue state" is not simply a criminal state, but one that defies the orders of the powerful - who are, of course, exempt.

From a reader: An African saying: Politicians are like bananas; They all hang together, They are all yellow, And there isn't a straight one in the bunch!

The new war crimes court was conceived as a way to pursue global pariahs such as Pol Pot. Actually, the US has often supported such leaders. And, the US is guilty of far greater "crimes against humanity", "war crimes", and murders of civilians than any of those targeted by the US in its policy of disinformation and sleight-of-hand, designed to distract everyone from its own evil acts.

The hunt is on once again for war criminals, with ongoing trials of accused Serbs in The Hague, NATO raids seizing and killing other accused Serbs, and much discussion and enthusiasm in the media for bringing Pol Pot to trial, which the editors of the New York Times assure us would be "an extraordinary triumph for law and civilization" (June 24).

The Politics of War Criminality: There are, however, large numbers of mass murderers floating around the world. How are the choices made on who will be pursued and who will be granted impunity? The answer can be found by following the lines of dominant interest and power and watching how the mainstream politicians, media, and intellectuals reflect these demands. Media attention and indignation "follows the flag," and the flag follows the money (i.e., the demands of the corporate community), with some eccentricity based on domestic political calculations. This sometimes yields droll twists and turns, as in the case of Saddam Hussein, consistently supported through the 1980s in his war with Iran and chemical warfare attacks on Iraqi Kurds, until his invasion of Kuwait in 1990, transformed him overnight into "another Hitler." (See earlier newsletters for elucidation of the US treachery which set up Saddam and Iraq for annihilation - editor).

Similarly, Pol Pot, "worse than Hitler" until his ouster by Vietnam in 1979, then quietly supported for over a decade by the United States and its western allies (along with China) as an aid in "bleeding Vietnam," but now no longer serviceable to western policy and once again a suitable target for a war crimes trial. Another way of looking at our targeting of war criminals is by analogy to domestic policy choices on budget cuts and incarceration, where the pattern is to attack the relatively weak and ignore and protect those with political and economic muscle. Pol Pot is now isolated and politically expendable, so an obvious choice for villainization. By contrast, Indonesian leader Suharto, the butcher of perhaps a million people (mainly landless peasants) in 1965-66, and the invader, occupier, and mass murderer of East Timor from 1975 to today, is courted and protected by the Great Powers, and was referred to by an official of the Clinton administration in 1996 as "our kind of guy." Pinochet, the torturer and killer of many thousands, is treated kindly in the United States as the Godfather of the wonderful new neo-liberal Chile. President Ford and Secretary of State Kissinger, who gave the go ahead to Suharto's invasion of East Timor and subsequent massive war crimes there, and the same Kissinger, who helped President Nixon engineer and then protect the Pinochet coup and regime of torture and murder and directed the first phase of the holocaust in Cambodia (1969-75), remain honored citizens. The media have never suggested that these men should be brought to trial in the interest of justice, law, and "civilization."

The Times editorial of June 24 recognizes a small problem in pursuing Pol Pot, arising from the fact that after he was forced out of Cambodia by Vietnam, "From 1979 to 1991, Washington indirectly backed the Khmer Rouge, then a component of the guerrilla coalition fighting the Vietnamese installed Government [in Phnom Penh]." This does seem awkward: the United States and its allies giving economic, military, and political support to Pol Pot, and voting for over a decade to have his government retain Cambodia's UN seat, but now urging his trial for war crimes. The Times misstates and understates the case: the United States gave direct as well as indirect aid to Pol Pot - in one estimate, $85 million in direct support - and it "pressured UN agencies to supply the Khmer Rouge," which "rapidly improved" the health and capability of Pol Pot's forces after 1979 (Ben Kiernan, "Cambodia's Missed Chance," Indochina Newsletter, Nov.-Dec. 1991). U.S. ally China was a very large arms supplier to Pol Pot, with no penalty from the U.S. and in fact U.S. connivance - Carter's National Security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski stated that in 1979 "I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot ... Pol Pot was an abomination. We could never support him but China could."

In 1988-89 Vietnam withdrew its army from Cambodia, hoping that this would produce a normalization of relationships. Thailand and other nations in the region were interested in a settlement, but none took place for several more years "because of Chinese and U.S. rejection of any ... move to exclude the Khmer Rouge. The great powers ... continued to offer the Khmer Rouge a veto," which the Khmer Rouge used, with Chinese aid, "to paralyse the peace process and ... advance their war aims." The Bush administration threatened to punish Thailand for "its defection from the aggressive U.S. - Chinese position," and George Shultz and then James Baker fought strenuously to sabotage any concessions to Vietnam, the most important of which was exclusion of Pol Pot from political negotiations and a place in any interim government of Cambodia. The persistent work of the Reagan-Bush team on behalf of Pol Pot has been very much downplayed, if not entirely suppressed, in the mainstream media.

The Times has a solution to the awkwardness of the post-1978 Western support of Pol Pot: "All Security Council members ... might spare themselves embarrassment by restricting the scope of prosecution to those crimes committed inside Cambodia during the four horrific years of Khmer Rouge rule." We must give the Times credit for semi honesty in admitting that this is to avoid embarrassing the Great Powers. It is interesting, though, that the Times finds no real problem in the "dirty hands," and hypocrisy, so apparent in the lengthy support of war criminals, and that it offers no reflections on how "law and civilization" are served if the criminals were protected and supported for more than a decade by the forces of law and order.

TWO PHASES OF CAMBODIAN "GENOCIDE":

The Times, along with everybody else in the mainstream media, also fails to mention that before Pol Pot came to power in 1975, the United States had devastated Cambodia for the first half of what a Finnish government's study referred to as a "decade" of genocide (not just the four years of Pol Pot's rule, 1975 - 78). The "secret bombing" of Cambodia by the Nixon -Kissinger gang may have killed as many Cambodians as were executed by the Khmer Rouge and surely contributed to the ferocity of Khmer Rouge behavior toward the urban elite and citizenry whose leaders had allied themselves with the foreign terrorists. The U.S. - imposed holocaust was a "sideshow" to the Vietnam War, the United States bombing Cambodia heavily by 1969, helping organize the overthrow of Sihanouk in 1970, and in collaboration with its puppet Saigon government making period incursions into Cambodia in the 1960s and later. "U.S. B-52s pounded Cambodia for 160 consecutive days [in 1973], dropping more than 240,000 short tons of bombs on rice fields, water buffalo, villages (particularly along the Mekong River) and on such troop positions as the guerrillas might maintain," a tonnage that "represents 50 percent more than the conventional explosives dropped on Japan during World War II".

This "constant indiscriminate bombing" was of course carried out against a peasant society with no airforce or ground defenses. The Finnish government study estimates that 600,000 people died in this first phase, with 2 million refugees produced. Michael Vickerey estimated 500,000 killed in phase one. At the end of the first half of the decade of genocide, with the Khmer Rouge victorious and occupying Phnom Penh in April 1975, Cambodia was a shattered, embittered society, on the verge of mass starvation with crops unsowed and vast numbers of refugees in and around Phnom Penh suddenly cut off from the U.S. aid that had kept them alive. High U.S. officials were estimating a million deaths from starvation before the Khmer Rouge takeover. The Khmer Rouge forced a mass exodus from Phnom Penh, whose population they were in no position to feed, an action interpreted in the West as simply a completely unjustified exercise in vengeance.

There is no question but that the Khmer Rouge were brutal and killed large numbers. Michael Vickerey estimated 150-300,000 executed and an excess of deaths in the four years of Pol Pot rule of 750,000. David Chandler estimates up to 100,000 executions (Newsweek, June 30, 1997). The Finnish study estimated the total deaths in the Pol Pot years at a million, encompassing both executions and deaths from disease, starvation and overwork. Other serious studies of Cambodia yield comparable numbers. ... In one famous formulation, "the bigger the crime the smaller the penalty" (Friedrich Schiller). This is not unreasonable for single countries, but in international affairs we need a refinement: the bigger the crime the smaller the penalty only if you are the dominant power, servant of that power, or military victor. Though Germany was powerful, some Nazi leaders were executed for war crimes after the German defeat; Pol Pot may be tried because he is weak, a loser, and no longer useful to the Great Powers as he was from 1979 to the mid 1990s. (He has since died of course - sparing the US great embarrassment with what he could have said - editor).

On the other hand, Suharto services U.S., Japanese, and other global interests, is protected by the hegemonic power, and is therefore a "moderate" rather than war criminal for Western elites and mainstream media.

As if you needed me to tell you about crooked police: Subject: Law enforcement officers have long had a tradition of abusing the law in New York City (and just about everywhere else). Since the beginning of the 1900s they have been protectors of crime. The classic case is the exception of officer Frank Serpico, who refused to accept the weekly payoff money and was ostracized by his fellow officers, who felt they couldn't trust him because he was the only one in the precinct not being bribed. The practice of "cooping" has been common to the police for a century. They find a place to hang out, where they can either engage in vice or receive a payoff, or just avoid being out on the street doing their job (where they might have to face a criminal or get hurt).

Friday July 17: Twenty NY police accused in sex scandal. NEW YORK (Reuters) - A group of police officers has been accused of protecting a brothel in Manhattan's famous Times Square area for as long as 15 years in exchange for sex, officials said Friday. NY City Police Commissioner Howard Safir said at a news conference that four supervisors of the Midtown South Precinct had been transferred and 20 officers moved to desk jobs after an 18-month investigation. Investigators believe a small number of the 400 police officers in the precinct had sex with prostitutes during day shifts at an apartment brothel known to the officers as "The Coop" in return for not enforcing the law. The officers allegedly disappeared from their jobs for hours at a time and others may have known about their activities but failed to report them, officials said. Safir said the four supervisors had been transferred for "a failure to supervise" and not for being involved in the alleged corruption. "This operation of alleged corrupt acts of police officers who obtained sexual favors in return for protection of a prostitution ring appears to have been going on for 10 years, it may even have been going on for 12 or 15 years," Mayor Rudolph Giuliani told the same news conference. No criminal charges have been filed against any police officers and none of those accused have been arrested, officials said. They said the Manhattan District Attorney's office and the police department's Internal Affairs Bureau were investigating.

NOT ALL NATIONAL LEADERS ARE FOOLS

Some Russian politicians are refusing the bail out (so-called) of fractured, dying Russia, by the IMF and World bank, complaining that the move is extortion, and that the country will virtually belong to the rapacious world Bank and IMF, controlled as it is by Zionists, if they fall for the obvious exploitative ploy.

The accuracy of their assessment spells even more trouble for Russia, which is heading for civil war again, and for the financial controllers who will be exposed to other nations even more. And many more will see how they have been duped. As countries default on payments, the IMF and World Bank will collapse.

Have you noticed how the reforms being sought by the IMF and World bank in all the countries severely disadvantage the people while increasing profits for investors and guaranteeing the safety of their investments?

The real point is for the rich to get richer at the expense of the poor and to save these countries in a way in which their investments will be safe, regardless of the consequences to the little people. We saw it in Indonesia and other Asian Tiger economies. But the little downtrodden people are seeing through this ruse. They have had enough. Hence the revolts in South Korea, the strikes and mayhem in Indonesia, the unrest in many other nations. How long do you think it will be before all downtrodden workers realize that they have been had? Foreign investments may appear good in the short term for governments as they provide jobs. But in the long term the profits drain the wealth of nations and turn the people into slaves.

Nowhere is this better seen than in Japan where the workers were corporate robots, and America, where the lower class of worker is a slave. While the corporations are rich, the people are impoverished. If they do have material possessions, they are owned largely by finance companies. That explains why so few Americans own their house and land. Even Australia is no longer owned by the people. It has been sold off to the foreign investors. We are becoming a nation of factory workers and mindless fast food dispensers the profits of which leave the country, further impoverishing the lucky country.

Indeed, capitalism is the most evil of the exploitative systems. That is why it has flourished so well. It allows the rich to get richer at the expense of the poor and middle class which has all but disappeared. This is a recipe for disaster and has already fanned the flames of revolt as we see in many unstable countries including the ones I mentioned above, and given ammunition to those like Pauline Hanson who peddle demagoguism.

From our book "Making Sense of the Madness,
Volume 2, Keys To Reality":

It is obvious that the more the physical body can be programmed to respond reflexly to conditions and agents in this dimension (which is generally under the control of the evil demigod) the less spiritual awareness and true connection to the Inner Divine Mind will there be. Then the attention is diverted from the knowledge within, from the War that is raging, from the loss of awareness, from the loss of energy and total entrapment in this plane, when the body is thus programmed. The most successfully developed programming pathway, after food, with which to trap True Beings is sex.

I stated earlier that before the takeover by the Usurper the number of True Beings was fixed and that there was no need for procreation or sex for pleasure. There was no need for procreation because physical bodies did not exist. The dimension was ethereal. Matter did not exist. No new consciousnesses were needed to be accommodated.

The evolvement of the sexual system allowed profound programming of the bodies and, of course, provided the new bodies needed by the newly created non-Permanent Atom consciousnesses. The demigod was incapable of creating Permanent Atom units of consciousness because his creative abilities did not reach such an authoritative level. Once this dimension was enclosed, he tricked the units of Permanent Atom consciousness into the bodies he had evolved and each of the Permanent Atom consciousnesses was split into two, giving them male and female characteristics by adjustments to the circuits and components. And each half was placed in a male or female body. The splitting of True Beings had the effect of halving the awareness of the beings in one move. So each entity had a male and a female manifestation, such sexual manifestations being properties of the bodies only and not of the consciousnesses occupying them -- until another modification was performed by the evil usurper. This was a modification to the outer rings of awareness of the True Beings which gave some of them an essence of femininity.

The bodies the beings now occupied were programmed to copulate via the reproductive system that developed in the bodies and via the hormones, emotional body, outer mind and food. They did this with both their own class and the lower classes (animals). The True Beings within were stunned into an inert state of awareness, such was the power of this programmed sex. And so the "Sons of God looked upon the daughters of men and found them fair." (Genesis). In this way, intermingling and intermarriage occurred, with the programmed bodies not caring about the true identity of the consciousness within the bodies with which they copulated.

The True Beings were swept along with the highly emotive and pleasurable programming totally unaware of the massive energy drainage and the destructive negative energy transfer which was occurring to them during the physical union. The interclass breeding resulted in many hybrids and was not stopped until less than 12,000 years ago in ancient Egypt. This practice was stopped by the Light which modified the fertility processes. The occurrence of such interbreeding gave rise to the directive found in some of the ancient scriptures which states "Keep the race pure." The continued practice of interclass copulation in certain areas resulted in total condemnation and such occurrences have remained in stories such as that of Sodom and Gomorrah.

With the very powerful sex urge and copulatory process the evil usurper developed the most efficient and immensely successful method of mixing the two creations. Sex allowed the transfer of energy between the two participants and all levels were affected --- the physical, etheric, emotional, mental and spiritual. In the act, particularly at climax, alignment of the various structures of the beings allowed the following:

1.   A flow of energy from one to the other. Hence, if intercourse occurred between a robotic non-Permanent Atom being and a True Permanent Atom Being, the True Being lost positive energy to the robotic being (and after all, this was the ulterior motive of the evil demigod and the reason for the takeover, the war, the programming, the illusion, the deceit and the rebellion). In return, the robotic being provided negative energy to the True Being which polluted and programmed the True Being further and caused further loss of awareness, energy drainage and a blocking of the inner nuclear mind. Thus, the True Being became weakened and was an even easier target for programming in subsequent episodes, encounters and future lives.

2.   Excitation of the emotional bodies which acted as a bind between the two beings, thus emotionally trapping them. Like certain food and drugs, this emotional excitation became addictive and hence, the programming effect of the sexual desire became stronger.

As fertility increased and conception occurred, the modifications implanted on the outer rings of awareness, when the True Beings were split to enter a male and a female body each, were then activated and the beings became emotionally bound to the offspring. Hence, the trap tightened more and more, binding the True Beings into roles and social situations for which they were never intended. The energy drainage which results when a True Being copulates with a Mock being is massive and disastrous for the True Being. The units of consciousness of the True Being lose their energy and this greatly impedes their ability to express outwardly onto the outer physical mind. In other words, spiritual awareness is reduced. The energy content of the nuclei within these units of consciousness is decreased and they are less effective.

Until that lost positive energy can be replaced, and that can only occur through true Divine healing, (discussed in later chapters) that being is losing Divine energy, spirituality and awareness, and will eventually fall from class 4 to class 3. As the energy content within the units of consciousness becomes weaker, the effect on the outer mind by the Divine nuclei is weakened and it is easier to be blocked off. Hence, negative programming factors on the outer mind become more effective. At the same time the negative energy acquired from the non-Permanent Atom sexual partner has effects on the True Being at various levels:

At the physical level it can cause a variety of physical diseases, ranging from minor ones of nuisance value only, such as non-specific urethritis, herpes and warts, to more serious ones such as gonorrhoea and syphilis and even life-threatening ones such as AIDS. From previous points I have made about programming, you will note that the physical effects will eventually cause modifications in the autonomic nervous system, endocrine system (hormones), various organs, etc. and the disease process will cause outer mind programming with behaviourial modifications and mood alterations. As further proof of this, just observe the mental and mood changes in yourself and/or others during the most apparently innocuous disease that a person can suffer, namely, the common cold. It is no coincidence. What is observed is the programming and polluting effects of the coryza virus. Even the slightest cold has long term effects on the body, which last the life of the individual, even though these effects may not be obvious.

At the etheric level the negative energy will cluster about the various pathways communicating with the physical body and cause drainage of prana. This can also cause a change of aura (loss of lustre). That negative energy accumulation may enhance an evil entity's power of possession. Such entities often lurk in the aura of recipients of polluting negative energy awaiting a chance to infiltrate the consciousness (i.e. possess the being). This is one explanation for sexual psychopathy. The negative energy can also simply stay within the etheric body lying dormant and not producing an injury or disease until much later, unless, of course, it is neutralized. Dorian Grey episodes (where the effects of negative energy are never seen on the polluted one) are rare in real life. Promiscuous and lustful people eventually develop mannerisms and appearances, including the way they dress, which attest to their negative energy accumulation, negative energy distribution and pollution. They are obvious to any with even the slightest awareness and that is because of changes in their total demeanour which result in changes to their aura.

At the emotional body level the negative polluting energy can trigger off various emotions which can further program and trap the being. The sexual excitement can engender greed or lust. At other times depending on previous programming it can engender frustration, anger, guilt, shame, remorse, depression, etc.

These effects all program the being further. Psychic attack is also common during sexual intercourse between a True Being and a mock being and this can manifest as headache, general malaise, guilt, agitation, depression, etc., either immediately or later on. It is no coincidence that the wrong type of food, alcohol, drugs, etc. lead to promiscuity and sexual perversion. There is a close synergistic correlation between the programming negative energy in all these agents and one leads to another. It is almost impossible, of course, to distinguish True Beings from mock beings in the physical alone with a cursory examination. Hence, one is disadvantaged severely in not knowing with whom one is sharing sex. Nonetheless, this information highlights the dangers of sex and promiscuity and multiple sex partners.

One can now perceive the evil essence in sects which advocate and indeed provide free and uninhibited sex to their members supposedly as a means of spiritual awakening, advancement and liberation. They are evil institutions promoting further pollution of True Beings for their ultimate spiritual assassination, the very opposite of what they claim they do.

Nothing on this plane is as it appears superficially. Beware and be warned. Keep away from sects, cults and indoctrinating institutions, religious or otherwise, which try to prevent you from thinking for yourself. The sexual appetite, like many programmed emotional appetites, can be curbed. The sexual energy can be sublimated into the higher realms of consciousness. That is, the energy of the units of consciousness (chakras), which run the sex organs, can be sublimated into the higher chakras without ill effects. In Truth, as spiritual awareness increases, the need for sensual self-gratification decreases and one becomes master of the body and the senses.

Conversely, if one allows unchecked programming to affect the emotional body, especially sexually, one is at risk of succumbing to avarice and lust and becoming a victim of insatiable appetites which lead to further depravity and loss of true spirituality. Those who advocate a sexual expression for the elevation of the "kundalini", the generic energy at the base of the spine, for accelerated enhancement of spiritual awareness, are dangerous fools. What such a practice does is to allow the base centres of consciousness, associated with the sexual energy, to dominate the higher centres of consciousness.

What this means is an almost certain loss of awareness and a block of the higher centres. A danger of increased sexual promiscuity is present. In other words, the practitioner is very much in danger of being worse off if he succeeds in lifting that lower energy into his or her higher centres during sexual relations with an evil being or heavily polluted True Being who in practical terms would be just as damaging to the partner.

Masturbation is a total loss of energy and cannot result in sublimation of energy under any circumstances, inspite of what evil beings or evil indoctrinated beings say!

Sex between faithful True Beings can be used as an exercise of contemplative enhancement of the Universal Love and Creative Power which are essences of the True Beings. Alignment of chakras, particularly with fully functioning heart chakras (chakra number 4) between the two beings, can bring an exhilarating exchange of positive energy to them. Such exchanges give comfort, joy, harmony and fulfilment. These expressions of love do not come from the physical act itself but rather from the melding of the two Divine Consciousnesses which dwell within those bodies. The physical act itself merely serves to give a physical focus. The true exchange is in the subtle bodies and in the centres of consciousness. The lower sexual energy is not being elevated in this union. When such a union occurs there is no pollution or drainage of energy, but rather an enhancement of all aspects of well-being --- in the physical, etheric, emotional, mental and spiritual. This is the closest True Beings trapped in the physical bodies can get to that process they were once accustomed to, of sharing and swapping units of consciousness, so that they could exchange each other's experiments, experiences and joy and which allowed all of them to identify as identical units of Divinity on an evolutionary path on which each was as important as the other and in which the rate of evolution of each was the concern of every other sharing individual.

A word of caution however. As most cannot perceive the ontological nature of beings just yet, it would be foolish to identify someone as a True Being and have sex with him/her thinking pollution will not occur. Abstinence at this stage is the better choice by far.

The evil demigod was able to place various characteristics within the consciousnesses that he manipulated in his trap and in those he created. The mechanism for these characteristics was placed directly in the emotional electromagnetic structure of the bodies it created and allowed to evolve, and also on the Rings of Awareness of both Permanent Atoms and non-Permanent Atoms. The characteristics were shared by both sexes at the rings of awareness and at the emotional body. The outer mind is influenced directly by these traits and by programming. The emotional body is affected by the influence directly of the female traits acting on it and also by the physical secondary sex characteristics and external programming. When the effects are both of the female traits, the female tendencies are strongly manifested.

When a being has the female influence acting on the rings of awareness and mind, and the emotional body has a predominantly male influence acting on it, a conflict can arise. This conflict can give rise to a confused expression of sexuality in the person. This is a simplified explanation for homosexuality. In other words, if a body (genetically programmed) is male and a consciousness with the female traits influencing the rings occupies it, a conflicting expression of sexuality can arise. The male body can mentally express female tendencies. The emotional body is that of a male, the secondary sex characteristics, as genetically determined, are of a male. Programming can then further influence the mind which has a female tendency to express more and more its female tendency inspite of the physical characteristics. The emotional body and physical body are then influenced by the outer mind to express female tendencies.

A body with genetically determined female characteristics and female emotional body traits also can be inhabited by a `male' consciousness and the outer mind can be programmed to suppress the female body and emotions to a degree where a male tendency is expressed. It is predominantly the sexual tendency of the consciousness and not of the physical body that ultimately expresses. This mix-up of a "male" consciousness using a female body and vice versa occurs because of errors when bodies and situations are selected for various reincarnating consciousnesses. Such errors have occurred more frequently lately because the evil side has been running short of energy to sponsor its programs. The mix-up is also purposely orchestrated to exploit beings. There are many other factors which influence the degree of programming of the outer mind and therefore, have a bearing on the final outcome of what sexuality is expressed. The development of secondary sex characteristics and corresponding sex hormone levels, outer mind programming, and outer mind manifestation, are all secondary to the primary structure of the rings of awareness and the emotional body. In other words, enough hormones of the opposite gender can be given to a person to alter the expressed sexuality of the person. Also, in changed conditions, the programming from the environment can cause the same change. When that programming ceases, the sexuality reverts to the previous one. This explains the sexual and psychic changes that have been observed in wars, jails, periods of isolation from the opposite sex, etc. Note that it is always negative energy which induces such programming.

From chapter 15 of our book "Making Sense of the Madness,
Volume One, What's Going On?":

The evil demigod was able to place various characteristics within the bodies that it manipulated in this universe. The mechanism for these characteristics was placed directly in the emotional electromagnetic structure and also on the rings of awareness of both True and Mock Beings.

Female traits, such as the maternal instinct and possessiveness, were copied from the metaphysical anatomy of other races in other universes. In these other beings, these characteristics are not of a female or sexual nature and not of a possessive nature. They are not sexual beings and do not manifest via an emotional body for this does not exist in their dimension. The characteristics were not associated with bearing children or rearing of the young. They were modified to exhibit this programming in this dimension. It may be difficult to accept that such emotions are programming of a being. But if one examines the animal kingdom, where programming is easier to perceive in this neonatal maternal role, the programming effects of various agents including organic molecules in odours and other hormones are clearly seen. For example, in many species, including common sheep, etc., if there is no immediate bonding between the neonate and the mother, the programming in the mother is not triggered and the offspring may be neglected. The time of bonding is crucial, for once it passes, the programming agents have no further effect. Another example is the lack of such programmed response in the males of the species generally. Their biological anatomy does not include this maternal programmed response. Hence, they do not demonstrate the characteristics required for nurturing as much. They are programmed differently.

The evil demigod kidnapped some of the beings with heightened abilities for nurturing and was able to transfer the modified mechanism of the inner attributes onto one half of the split Permanent Atoms which were to have female awareness. It also transferred these attributes onto the rings of awareness of some of its mock beings.

It modified the awareness of the beings of this universe. Beings act with the modifications in the awareness (for female traits) in conjunction with the modifications in the emotional body which accommodate and enhance these female sex traits. This programming expresses the feminine characteristics in this dimension which are associated with the natural and expected (programmed) protection of a mother for its young.

For the identification of the source of these characteristics the name "Race of Women" has been given to one of the races outside of this dimension from which they were obtained. They are not sexual beings. These female attributes and characteristics were required by the evil demigod for the programs of sexual reproduction and the rearing of children involved in its plan.

The masculine aspect of the race was allowed to evolve with a greater development of the EGO, a very evil and destructive creation, and the competitive nature that the ego would manifest. The characteristics were shared in both males and females to some extent, one body having a predominant trait manifesting.

The female characteristics have two sites of influence. One at the Rings of awareness, the other at the emotional body. The outer mind is influenced directly by these traits and by programming. The emotional body is affected by the influence directly of the female traits acting on it and also the feedback from the physical secondary sex characteristics and external programming. When the effects are both of the female traits, the female tendencies are strongly manifested.

When a being has the female influence acting on the rings of awareness and mind, and the emotional body has a predominantly male influence acting on it, a conflict can arise. This conflict can give rise to a confused expression of sexuality in the person. This is a simplified explanation for homosexuality. In other words, a conflict can arise if a consciousness with the female traits influencing the rings of awareness occupies a body which is genetically programmed as male.

The male body can mentally express female tendencies. The emotional body is that of a male, the secondary sex characteristics, as genetically determined, are of a male. Programming can then further influence the mind which has a female tendency to express more and more its female tendency inspite of the physical characteristics. The emotional body and physical body are then influenced by the outer mind to express female tendencies.

A body with genetically determined female characteristics and female emotional body traits also can be inhabited by a "male" consciousness and the outer mind can be programmed to suppress the female body and emotions to a degree where a male tendency is expressed. It is predominantly the sexual tendency of the consciousness and not of the physical body that ultimately expresses.

This mix up of a "male" consciousness using a physical female body and vice versa occurs because of errors when bodies and situations are selected for various reincarnating consciousnesses. Such errors have occurred more frequently lately because the evil side has been running short of energy to sponsor its programs correctly and check for errors.

There are many other factors which influence the degree of programming of the outer mind from without, and therefore have a bearing on the final outcome of which sexuality is expressed. The development of secondary sex characteristics and corresponding sex hormone levels and outer mind programming, and outer mind manifestation, are all subject to the primary structure of the rings of awareness and the emotional body. There is no sexuality in the Divine Dimensions. Until this dimension is transmuted, the differing attitudes that can occur between the awareness and the body with regard to sex will exist.

Many of the consciousnesses from the Race of Women, which has been codenamed the Blue Race, have been kidnapped and brought here. Their Permanent Atoms were split and they make up numbers in the population. Their suffering and torment is great without them knowing the real reason. Life after life after life their anguish and inner unhappiness has manifested as deep mental disturbances giving rise to depression, alcoholism, drug addiction, suicidal tendencies, persistent dissatisfaction with life and an unfulfilled longing for "home".

This need to program a nurturing nature may seem far-fetched. But it is not, when one realizes the basic nature of evil beings is bellicose in the extreme. They are cannibalistic and destructive to the point of self-destruction. Every species evil has created demonstrates even this cannibalistic trait. Fish eat fish, birds eat birds, reptiles other reptiles, etc. Humans still practice this in some parts of the world. And educated beings from the most modern societies have been noted, under duress, to atavistically return to this practice. This programming was necessary therefore to prevent the evil beings from eating their own young.

Some animals still demonstrate this evil tendency and the female has to hide the offspring from the male who will eat them if he can. The programmed differences in males and females are artificial in these evil levels. As the end time approaches and these artificial evil mechanisms break down, a far more fierce Battle of the Sexes will ensue for the two sexual types are really diametrically opposed. Such a battle has always existed, but it will intensify and the sexes will see each other as mortal enemies due to the flaws of this programming.

Endtime regression will also expose the destructive evil nature at its worst and cannibalism will return, with mothers even eating their own offspring, as males battle females. Sexual appeasement which thus far has kept them programmed to be reasonably tolerant will no longer be enough, for as the gloom of doom is realized by evil beings, their evilness will no longer be hidden by the modicum of respectability they feigned. Those are the days when the dead will be envied. Then the full horror of the monstrosities this evil essence has created will be seen.

One would think that such a plan to introduce nurturing programming would be plausible. But it is an imperfectly thought out plan. It goes against the very nature of the evil beings. It is an artificial imposition and many times the evil beings escape from the effect of the programming, even in the human class, and not only neglect their young but also kill them.

In programming mothers to protect and nurture their young at all costs in order for the species to be propagated, a selfishness is also manifested which disadvantages others. Hence this programming produced strife and friction. It is commonly seen in society. Some are loved ones others are not. But why does the rest of humanity not consist of loved ones? Why do some care far more for their children than the children of others? It is because of this flawed programming. It allows the eventual development of the "them and us" mentality and attitudes which are exploited to allow destruction of the "them" as in wars.

This is not love. This is programmed forceful exploitation of individuals for continuation of an evil scheme and programmed strife. Universal love is the attitude in True Beings by which all are loved and nurtured equally.

In a Divine setting, labels would not designate partitions and create enemies as occurs on this level. Each would feel equal love for all. And each would see each other as a loved one regardless of labels.

Sexuality is an evil artificial programming. We are all familiar with the problems it causes: lust, overcrowding, neglect, infanticide, prostitution, venereal disease, pimps, exploitation, rape, mental trauma, religiously imposed guilt, etc. It is such a monstrosity that it appears poetic justice that sexuality should provide a means of ensuring humanity's total destruction via the AIDS virus.

Dear Dr., Having read your excellent historical article on China and the drug trade, I thought you might be interested in the role of Zionist Jews in Hong Kong, the opium trade, etc. This article is from the Internet. I am a keen history student and a non-Zionist Jew who believes we are living in hell because of all these terrible things Zionists do to the so-called goyim. This short essay is entitled:

The 99 year British lease on Hong Kong expired in July allowing the Red Chinese to take over. Hundreds of newspaper stories and TV reports have covered this event but not one revealed how England first gained control of Hong Kong! The truth lies buried in the family line of David Sassoon, "The Rothschilds of The Far East," and their monopoly over the opium trade. Britain won Hong Kong by launching the opium Wars to give the Sassoons exclusive rights to drug an entire nation! David Sassoon was born in Baghdad, Iran in 1792. His father, Saleh Sassoon, was a wealthy banker and the treasurer to Ahmet Pasha, the governor of Baghdad. (Thus making him the "court Jew" - a highly influential position.) In 1829 Ahmet was overthrown due to corruption and the Sassoon family fled to Bombay, India. This was the strategic trade route to interior India and the gateway to the Far East. In a brief time the British government granted Sassoon "monopoly rights" to all manufacture of cotton goods, silk and most important of all Opium - then the most addictive drug in the world!

The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the various major opium exchanges in China. According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: "He employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built synagogues and schools for them. He imported whole families of fellow Jews ... and put them to work." Sassoon's sons were busy pushing this mind -destroying drug in Canton, China. Between 1830 - 1831 they trafficked 18,956 chests of opium earning millions of dollars. Part of the profits went to Queen Victoria and the British government.

In the year 1836 the trade increased to over 30,000 chests and drug addiction in coastal cities became endemic. In 1839, the Manchu Emperor ordered that it be stopped. He named the Commissioner of Canton, Lin Tse-hsu, to lead a campaign against opium. Lin seized 2,000 chests of Sassoon opium and threw it into the river. An outraged David Sassoon demanded that Great Britain retaliate.

Thus, the Opium Wars began with the British Army fighting as mercenaries of the Sassoons. They attacked cities and blockaded ports. The Chinese Army, decimated by 10 years of rampant opium addiction, proved no match for the British Army. The war ended in 1839 with the signing of "The Treaty of Nanking." This included provisions especially designed to guarantee the Sassoons the right to enslave an entire population with opium. The "peace treaty" included these provisions:

British Prime Minister Palmerston wrote Crown Commissioner Captain Charles Elliot that the treaty didn't go far enough. He said it should have been rejected out of hand because: "After all, our naval power is so strong that we can tell the Emperor what we mean to hold rather than what he would cede. We must demand the admission of opium into interior China as an article of lawful commerce and increase the indemnity payments and British access to several additional Chinese ports." Thus, China not only had to pay Sassoon the cost of his dumped opium but reimburse England an unheard sum of 21 million pounds for the cost of the war! This gave the Sassoon's monopoly rights to distribute opium in port cities. However, even this was not good enough and Sassoon demanded the right to sell opium throughout the nation. The Manchus resisted and the British Army again attacked in the "Second Opium War fought 1858 -1860. Palmerston declared that all of interior China must be open for uninterrupted opium traffic. The British suffered a defeat at the Taku Forts in June 1859 when sailors, ordered to seize the forts, were run aground in the mud-choked harbor. Several hundred were killed or captured. An enraged Palmerston said: "We shall teach such a lesson to these perfidious hordes that the name of Europe will hereafter be a passport of fear. "In October, the British besieged Peking. When the city fell, British commander Lord Elgin, ordered the temples and other sacred shrines in the city sacked and burned to the ground as a show of Britain's absolute contempt for the Chinese. In the new "Peace Treaty" of Oct. 25, 1860, the British were assigned rights to vastly expanded opium trade covering seven-eights of China, which brought in over 20 million pounds in 1864 alone. In that year, the Sassoons imported 58,681 chests of opium and by 1880 it had skyrocketed to 105,508 chests making the Sassoons the richest Jews in the world. England was given the Hong Kong peninsula as a colony and large sections of Amoy, Canton, Foochow, Ningpo and Shanghai. The Sassoons were now licensing opium dens in each British occupied area with large fees being collected by their Jewish agents. Sassoon would not allow any other race to engage in "the Jews' business."

However, the British government would not allow any opium to be imported into Europe! Sassoon "Monopoly Rights" wrecked Lancashire and - England's Textile Industry.

Sir Albert Sassoon, the eldest of David Sassoon's sons took over the family "business" empire. He constructed huge textile mills in Bombay to pay slave labor wages. This expansion continued after World War One and ended up putting mills in Lancashire, England out of business with thousands losing their jobs. This did not stop Queen Victoria from having Albert knighted in 1872. Solomon Sassoon moved to Hong Kong and ran the family business there until his death in 1894. Later, the entire family moved to England because with modern communications they could operate their financial empire from their luxurious estates in London. They socialized with royalty and Edward Albert. Sassoon married Aline Caroline de Rothschild in 1887 which linked their fortune with that of the Rothschilds. The Queen also had Edward knighted. All 14 of the grandsons of David Sassoon were made officers during World War One and thus most were able to avoid combat. Franklin D. Roosevelt's fortune was inherited from his maternal grandfather Warren Delano. In 1830 he was a senior partner of Russell & Company. It was their merchant fleet which carried Sassoon's opium to China and returned with tea. Warren Delano moved to Newburgh, N.Y. In 1851 his daughter Sara Married a well-born neighbor, James Roosevelt - the father of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He always knew the origin of the family fortune but refused to discuss it. The Sassoon opium trade brought death and destruction to millions and still plagues Asia to this day. Their company was totally operated by Jews ONLY! The corrupt British monarchy honored them with privilege and knighthood - to the disgrace of the Crown! To this day the Sassoons are in the history books as "great developers" of India but the source of their vast wealth is never mentioned! (Name and Address on file).

My comment: In this short explicit exposé we see the anti-Christ energy working through Zionist Jews and British Imperialism at its malevolent maximum, subjugating and oppressing populations, exploiting the True Beings trapped in their midst for their energy, gained through suffering, while enriching its evil agents on this material level. I have exposed the maliciousness of Zionism many times, and it has no excuses. It is as evil as evil can be. In the future, I will expand on the malevolence expressing via the British and their colonizations which began in earnest following the regicidal era of Richard III, when Zionist control became even more powerful in that doomed nation. But that can wait. Let me finish this segment by asking you this:

P. Mathews - the hate-monger of previous newsletters, in attempting to prove he is no ordinary fool, has emailed many readers claiming "nothing is happening in the world". And this is inspite of all the information we publish. Only the damned, with the morbid fear of doom, can have such delusional wishful thinking!! I think in his quest to prove he is a complete moron he has succeeded 100% in proving he is an extraordinarily stupid fool. What do you think? But of course, this ability to deny the Greater Reality goes beyond foolishness and stupidity as I have written before. Such denial is a prime factor of desperate, doomed demons!! Indeed P. Mathews, you have left us in no doubt of who and what you are!

From Andrew Rowland:

Dear Dr. Chiappalone and Amitakh, Firstly I would like to sincerely thank you both for what you have been, and are still doing, to help to explain what is really happening on this planet to those people who choose to listen to you, and read your thoughts on your wonderful web site. I have only recently got to know something about your work through a chance listening to Sightings on the internet in the USA. What you were saying on the show certainly struck me like a lightening bolt as your views seemed to mirror many of the things I have also been privately thinking, on some sort of innate level, for quite some time now. One of the topics that you described that really grabbed my attention was your amazing essay on Terminal Madness. I in all honesty have been floundering in my personal life for some little time now as I tried to make sense of what was going on for myself personally and the world as a whole. I've heard you talk about road rage, and also drinking too much, and I can quite clearly see that this has been happening to me in a process of acceleration, again, for the last couple of years in particular. I know that something absolutely major is just over the horizon on just so many levels that subconsciously I was very worried about the processes that you have since explained so eloquently. On the other hand I also know that I am a caring and good person and that too many synchronous (as in Synchronicity) things have been happening to me in the last three years in particular (and to be honest, throughout my life to a certain extent) - that it's as if I feel that I am being watched and occasionally prodded in the right direction. People talk about a process of re-discovering one's spiritual self and I'm certain that on some level this is happening to me via dreams, very occasional telepathic ability and pretty amazing coincidences that seem to keep occurring to me. So yes, I believe that in some ways I was on the borderlines of falling into the early stages of what you have been describing - and I can see it all around me especially living as I do in America - but now I feel far more at peace with myself through the wisdom that you and others are imparting that I know that I am on the right track.

The Year 2000 Problem: It is my view, as a computer professional who has seen and worked with the old Dinosaur computers throughout my life in many cultures, that this Y2K problem is going to be far, far more serious than any government or agency is prepared to admit. Thank you for taking the trouble to read this, I look forward to hearing you on Sightings in the near future, and warmest regards to you both.

Andrew Rowland, S. F., California 94133, USA.

Healthcare costs in the U.S. are the highest in the world because of an inefficient private system that ensures profits for hospitals, blood-sucking middlemen (insurance companies), and drug companies, especially drug companies.

Pharmaceutical corporations are among the most profitable companies in the U.S. As an industry, they have the highest returns on revenue (their profits as a percentage of their total revenues), meaning that they take enormous markups on their products. Literally, they charge "what the market will bear," which is quite a lot if you have a severe illness and need pain killers, or better yet, a terminal illness that can be arrested with a pill (or lots of them). In other countries with national healthcare, governments have enacted price controls on drugs to limit skyrocketing costs, because the government has to pay for the drugs. Not so in the good ol' USA. Instead, you and I pay two times, three times, sometimes 10 times more for our medicine than people do in Canada, for example. This year, wholesale drug prices in the U.S. soared a record 10.7 percent in the month of May alone, then climbed another 3.2 percent in June.

How do pharmaceutical companies explain the high prices? They blame them on the cost to research and develop new drug therapies. R&D is expensive, but not as expensive as they want you to believe - certainly not as expensive as the cost to promote, market, and sell these drugs to hospitals, HMOs, and an estimated 600,000 prescribing physicians. On average, companies spend about $200 million to develop a new drug therapy (which includes all the tests and trials of drugs and chemical combinations that never prove useful). The last time Congress checked, back in 1991, annual R&D costs for U.S. pharmaceutical companies totaled $9 billion, yet drug companies spent more than $10 billion per year just to promote their products in the private marketplace - and that cost has only grown since then. In 1997, Bristol-Myers Squibb alone spent $1.4 billion on R&D, and a colossal $2.2 billion on advertising and promotion.

Why do drug companies need to spend so much money pushing their products? If the need is there, doctors will prescribe it, right? Not true. More than half of the new drugs developed every year are not designed to treat new or untreated conditions, but to compete with drugs that are already on the market. Called "me-too" drugs, these are easier and cheaper for companies to develop, because much of the basic research on how the drug should work in the human body has already been done - it's just a matter of finding a new, slightly different compound in the same class as the old drug. For the company to patent and market it, the new drug needs to be different, and if it is stronger and has different side-effects (hopefully fewer and less severe, but not always), so much the better.

The motive behind the "me-too" phenomenon is simple: as a drug that's been on the market for a number of years gets close [to] expiration of its patent, the company that owns the drug starts to panic. Once the patent expires, other companies can make generic versions of their best-selling, proprietary drug - thereby forcing the price down. The company has to find a new, different, more powerful drug to replace it. Of course, when the new drug hits the market, the company has to spend millions to persuade doctors to stop prescribing the old, cheaper medication and switch their patients to the new one. It's an endless cycle of skyrocketing costs fueled by the immoral, for-profit nature of the U.S. healthcare system.

We're always hearing about HMOs, hospitals, and insurance companies seeking ways to cut costs, and keeping down the cost of prescription medications is part of that process. But while it's becoming harder for drug companies to sell expensive new "me-too" drugs to doctors, there's a new promotional cost in the equation: They've started pushing their wares directly to consumers. In 1996, drug companies spent $600 million on direct advertising to consumers, which is twice what they spent in 1995 and almost ten times more than in 1991. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs is banned in most other nations, and the World Health Organization's Ethical Criteria for Medicinal Drug Promotion expressly forbids it.

Yet U.S. pharmaceutical companies are buying more billboards and TV time, and pushing more aggressively for their medicines to be switched from prescription-only to the over-the-counter market, so consumers can be free to self prescribe. More drugs were switched to over-the-counter status in 1997 than in the previous five years. Since 1986, the FDA has approved only 33 over-the-counter switches; over a third of those were done in 1995 and 1996. And in August 1997, the FDA finally gave in to drug company lobbyists and released new criteria for the advertising of drugs on TV, making it easier for drug companies to hock their wares directly to patients.

In addition to marketing costs, pharmaceutical companies take huge markups in devious ways. Most drug companies belong to a larger holding company that also owns a chemical company. The chemical company can make the drug chemicals in its own plant, then "sell" them to its sister division, the pharmaceutical company, at a high markup; this is called "transfer pricing." When consumers complain about prices, the pharmaceutical company then points to the high price it had to pay for "raw materials" - but they bought the chemicals from themselves and manufactured the high markup.

ZIONISM AT WORK

Many call Israel "Neo-Nazi Land". Below are some reasons why such a view is held by many non-Zionists, including many Jews. Read earlier newsletters for my definition of Zionism.

1        A Policy of Active genocide against the non-Jewish indigenes is being conducted by the hateful Israeli military, thus creating a Palestinian Holocaust we can all witness. Forget the myth-building of the WW 2 Jewish holocaust. The evidence of this Palestinian Holocaust we can all see on our TV screens. The latest incident involves the confiscation of goats from bedouins by the Israeli military, the excuse being that the animals were grazing on military land! These animals are the only wealth these downtrodden peasants have. It is the same as starving them to death. Is that not black-hearted genocide? What were the military going to do with the grass on what they claim was their land? Were they worried the goats would spy and steal military secrets? It is time the world stood up and righted such wrongs.

2        The love of money is the root of all evil. No one loves money more than Zionists (ontological, not racial):

Zionist businessman Nissim Zvili, a Jew from Israel, was convicted for supplying Iran, Israel's declared mortal enemy, with material to produce mustard and nerve gas and equipment to build munitions plants for chemical warheads from 1990-1995. Israeli PM Netanyahu is accused by various Jewish groups of interfering one way or another in the trial. He is such an evil being, why would he not interfere? This conviction demonstrates clearly that Zionists love money more than their country, their families, peace, etc. Why else would this Zvili sell such things for a profit and risk annihilating his own country and fellow racial Jews in a war?

3        Israel condemns Australian Mission

The Speaker of the Australian Federal Parliament has just returned from a mission to Israel and published a report of his recommendations. Ian Sinclair, as a politician, is one of those rare ones who is honest to the point of embarrassment for the other politicians. In the 30 years I have known him in public life, he has been fair in his dealings, and forthright. His recommendation was that Israel should accept the US proposals for continuing the Middle East Peace Process. For this he was condemned by Zionists in Australia and Israel, most unreasonably. He was called "patronizing" in the mildest form, and his report "a PLO propaganda document". Can you believe the Zionists could be so malicious? Of course you can. Their track record condemns them unreservedly.

4        Zionists want no peace at any price.

The reasons given by Israel for not pursuing Peace negotiations are, in the eyes of many, quite unreasonable. They refuse to give more than 9% of the land back to the Palestinians who want 13 % as recommended by the American Administration. The world is supposed to forget that the Zionists, against the wishes of non-Zionist Jews stole 100% of the land from the Palestinians, by a process of active genocide!! Where, just where is the justice in that?

What we are witnessing is the process of self-destruction which Israel is pursuing inexorably. It has now told the Americans, the British and the Europeans to mind their own business. All nations are fed up with its evil antics, especially the Arabs who are winning new friends daily. New lines are being drawn in the sand for a massive confrontational war. China is backing Arafat and his push for peace. France is backing Syria and its push. War will be inevitable. The UN and many other nations are realigning their support for the Palestinians. Israel is planting hatred. Whom will it blame when it is hated to extinction, by the seeds it planted? Many, including non-Zionists Jews, see this coming and they fear greatly. Evil begets evil and self-destruction!

5        U.N. condemns Israeli Human Rights abuses

"The United Nations grills Israelis on claim of torture" - by Elif Kaban in Geneva. This was the headline in our daily Courier Mail on July 17, 1998. The article stated: "Israel was put on the stand before a United Nations human rights watchdog in Geneva yesterday to answer allegations of torture, discrimination and detention without trial. Human rights groups sought the condemnation of the Jewish state at the UN Human Rights Committee whose 18 independent experts scrutinise states' compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. High on the agenda was Israel's treatment of Palestinians in the occupied Arab land, days after a snub in New York where UN member states voted overwhelmingly in favour of an Arab-sponsored motion to enhance Palestine status at the world body.

It was the first time Israel has faced the spotlight at the UN forum where it is presenting a report overdue since 1993. The body issues proposals to countries accused of rights abuses but has no power to apply sanctions, except the pressure from its international lawyers to embarrass and cajole. Many of the 140 UN member states which have signed the covenant rarely, if ever, submit monitoring reports. Israel has long tried to argue that it should not be required to report on the occupied territories, and was attacked in Geneva by the New York based rights group Human Rights Watch for not mentioning Palestinian territories in its report. "This report seriously misrepresents Israel's human rights record" Human Rights Watch executive director for the Middle East and North Africa Hanny Megally, said. The lawyers pressed Israel on the issues of Palestinian self-determination in the West Bank and Gaza strip, rights abuses in occupied territories, deaths in custody and alleged torture. Human Rights Watch accused Israel of torture and detention of individuals as "hostages" and called for its condemnation.

6        "I don't sign orders to destroy the houses of Jews, only of Arabs," said Haim Miller, deputy mayor of Jerusalem and acting mayor in Olmert's absence, quoted in Yediot Ha'akhronot, Feb. 7, 1998. Were the Nazi this racist?

7        US Media Mirror Distorts Middle East

From Salam.org: by Robert Fisk.

In Paris, Le Monde was last month warning its readers that Mr Netanyahu and US House Speaker Newt Gingrich were "dangerous" men. But in The New York Times, the increasingly messianic Thomas Friedman, an old colleague and friend of mine, was telling his readers that there was "a potentially great statesman" inside Mr. Netanyahu who "deserves credit for the fact that there has been relatively little Palestinian terrorism [sic] these past two years." After one terrible suicide bombing in Jerusalem, the mother of an Israeli girl victim wrote that it was Mr. Netanyahu's policies rather than the Palestinians who had killed her daughter. The Los Angeles Times put the bombing on page one, and the mother's remarkable statement on page five. Academics may one day decide how deeply the American public has been misled by the persistent bias of the US media, and the degree to which this has led them to support US policies which may destroy America's prestige in the Middle East. Meanwhile, US reporters are going to have to figure out a way of telling readers and viewers how a "dispute" over "neighborhoods" is turning into war. (Robert Fisk is a journalist.)

8        JUST WHO ARE THE HISTORY REVISIONISTS?

In attempting to turn a spurious defence into an attack, Zionists charge those like myself who present the correct story of their lies, atrocities and holocaust mythology as revisionists of history. Well, let's have a look at the evidence and see just who the history revisionists are.

What is interesting about the true history of Zionist terrorism and massacres in Palestine, is the fact that the Israelis have recently revised the history to deny that this holocaust ever took place. Their historians, in the face of countless eye-witness accounts, military reports, the establishment of concentration ("detention") camps, etc., have declared that there is no proof the massacres of Palestinians (especially the one at Deir Yassin) ever took place.

The leaders of these massacres invariably became the heads of the Israeli government and military, to continue their genocidal actions over the course of many decades, to the present day. And they deny this holocaust of the Palestinians! Who, then, are the revisionists of history?

Here is some data gleaned from the web which you should be aware of:

ISRAELI MASSACRES
from the web

Although the image that Israel distributes about herself is that of an oppressed nation, a nation that for long has endured the persecution of Europeans, it is with heavy hearts that we present these crimes that stand for themselves for the brutality of the Israeli Army and the heartlessness of its soldiers who seem to have a thirst for blood. It is for the hope that the world may see a clearer picture that we present these painful facts. It is interesting to notice that today's media does not dwell on these crimes as they do on the Holocaust. They are reported in the news for a week or two and then swept into the sea of oblivion. Those who attempt to revive the true history of Israel are charged of being anti-Semitic. So with the hope to keep those memories in mind we present this shameful history of Israel that seems to have found that the role of Goliath is more interesting than that of David. The following list of massacres is by no means exclusive, but they reflect the nature of the Zionist occupation of Palestine and show that massacres and expulsions were not aberrations that happen in any war, but organized atrocities with only one aim, that is to have a Zionist state which is 'goyim rein.'

LIST OF MASSACRES COMMITTED BY ZIONISTS
against Palestinians:

YEHIDA Massacre: 13 December 1947: men of the Arab village of Yehiday (near Petah Tekva, the first Zionist settlement to be established) met at the local coffee house when they saw a British Army patrol enter the village, they were reassured especially that Jewish terrorists had murdered 12 Palestinians the previous day. The four cars stopped in front of the cafe house and out stepped men dressed in khaki uniforms and steel helmets. However, it soon became apparent that they had not come to protect the villagers. With machine guns they sprayed bullets into the crowd gathered in the coffee house. Some of the invaders placed bombs next to Arab homes while other disguised terrorists tossed grenades at civilians. For a while it seemed as if the villagers would be annihilated but soon a real British patrol arrived to foil the well organized killing raid. The death toll of 7 Arab civilians could have been much higher. Earlier the same day 6 Arabs were killed and 23 wounded when home made bombs were tossed at a crowd of Arabs standing near the Damascus Gate in Jerusalem. In Jaffa another bomb killed six more Arabs and injured 40.

KHISAS Massacre: 18 December 1947: Two carloads of Haganah terrorists drove through the village of Khisas (on the Lebanese Syrian border) firing machine guns and throwing grenades. 10 Arab civilians were killed in the raid. QAZAZA Massacre: 19 December 1947: 5 Arab children were murdered when Jewish terrorists blew up the house of the village Mukhtar.

AL-SHEIKH VILLAGE Massacre: 1 January 1948: On that night around two hundred Zionists armed with hand grenades and machine guns sneaked into a small village called al-Sheikh village (5km South East of Haifa). The attackers came through the southern hills (most possibly from Nisher Jewish settlement which lies about 5Km south of the village). They attacked the houses on the edges of the village with hand-grenades and finished off with machine-guns killing around 40 of the Palestinians inhabitants of the village, mostly women and children.

DEIR YASSIN Massacre: 9-10 April 1948: The massacre that became the symbol of Zionist aggression of the Palestinians as well as Zionist treachery. The Mukhtar of the village had agreed with the Zionists to provide information on the movement of strangers in the area as well as other intelligence provided their village is spared. The Zionists were not to keep their side of the promise. In an operation which was called Operation Unity, the Haganah co-operated with the Irgun and the Stern Gang is this operation. At 4:30 am on Friday 9th April 1948 surrounded the village which was overlooked by two Jewish settlements, Givat Shaul and Montefiore. For two days Zionist terrorists killed men, women and children, raped women and stole their jewellery. A chilling account of the massacre is given by a Red Cross doctor who arrived at the village on the second day and saw himself -- the mopping up as one of the terrorists put it to him. He says that the mopping up had been done with machine guns, then grenades and finished off with knives. Women's bellies were cut open and babies were butchered in the hands of their helpless mothers. Around 250 people were murdered in cold blood. Of them 25 pregnant women were bayoneted in the abdomen while still alive. 52 children were maimed under the eyes of their own mothers, and they were slain and their heads cut off. The Jewish Agency and the commander of the British ground troops knew of the massacre while it was going on. However, no one intervened to stop it.

NASER AL-DIN Massacre: 13-14 April 1948, a contingent of Lehi and Irgun entered this village (near Tiberias) on the night of 13 April dressed as Arab fighters. Upon their entrance to the village the people went out to greet them, the terrorists met them with fire, killing every single one of them. Only 40 people survived. All the houses of the village were raised to the ground.

BEIT DARAS Massacre: 21 May 1948, after a number of failed attempts to occupy this village, the Zionists mobilized a large contingent and surrounded the village. The people of Beit Daras decided that women and children should leave. As women and children left the village they were met by the Zionist army who massacred them despite the fact that they could see they were women and children fleeing the fighting. THE DAHMASH MOSQUE Massacre: 11 July 1948, after the Israeli 89th Commando Battalion lead by Moshe Dayan occupied Lydda, the Israelis told Arabs through loudspeakers that if they went into a certain mosque they would be safe. In retaliation for a hand grenade attack after the surrender that killed several Israeli soldiers, 80-100 Palestinians were massacred in the mosque, their bodies lay decomposing for 10 days in the mid-summer heat. The mosque still stands abandoned today. This massacre spread fear and panic among the Arab population of Lydda and Ramle, who were then ordered to march out of these towns after they were stripped of all personal belonging by Israeli soldiers. Yitzak Rabin, Brigade Commander then says: "There was no way of avoiding the use of force and warning shots in order to make the inhabitants march ten to fifteen miles to the point where they met up with the legion." Most of the 60,000 inhabitants of Lydda and Ramble came to refugee camps near Ramallah, around 350 lost their lives on the way through dehydration and sun stroke. Many survived by drinking their own urine. The conditions in the refugee camps were to claim more lives.

DAWAYMA Massacre: 29 October 1948, the following is the testimony of a soldier who participated in the occupation of the village of Dawayma (in the Haifa subdistrict): "... They killed between 80 to 100 Arab men women and children. To kill children they fractured their heads with sticks. There was not one home left without corpses .... One commander ordered a soldier to bring two women into a building he was about to blow up... Another soldier prided himself on having raped an Arab woman before shooting her to death...." The massacre was perpetrated by the 89th Battalion, the authors of Lydda massacre.

SHARAFAT Massacre: 7 February 1951, Israeli soldiers crossed the armistice line to this village (5Km from Jerusalem) and blew up the houses of the Mukhtar and his neighbors. 10 were killed (2 elderly men, 3 women and 5 children) and 8 were wounded.

KIBYA Massacre: 14 October 1953, 9:30 pm about 700 regular Israeli troops attacked the border Jordanian village of Kibya, north west of Jerusalem. Using mortars, machine guns, rifles and explosives they blew up 42 houses, the local schools and the mosque. Every man, woman, and child found by these criminals was killed. 75 innocent villagers were murdered in cold blood. The raids were ordered by Ariel Sharon.

KAFR QASEM Massacre: 29 October 1956 Israeli frontier guards started at 4 pm what they called a tour of the Triangle Villages. They told the Mukhtars of those villages that the curfew from that day onwards was to start from 5 pm instead of 6 pm. They reached Kafr Qasem around 4:45 and informed the Mukhtar protested that there are about 400 villagers working outside the village and there is not enough time to inform them of the new times. An officer assured him that they would be taken care of. Then the guards waited at the entrance to the village. 43 Kafr Qasem inhabitants were massacred in cold blood by the army as they returned from work, their crime was violating a curfew they did not know about. On the northern entrance of the village 3 were killed and 2 were killed inside of the village. Amongst the dead were men, women, and children. Lieutenant Danhan was touring the area in his jeep reporting the massacre, on his wireless he said "minus 15 Arabs"; after a while his message on the radio to his H.Q. was "it is difficult to count".

AL-SAMMOU' Massacre: 13 November 1966, Israeli forces raided this village, destroyed 125 houses, the village clinic and school as well as 15 houses in a neighbouring village. 18 people were killed and 54 wounded.

THE SABRA AND SHATILA Massacre: 15-18 September 1982, after the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, Phalangist puppets of the Israelis massacred over 3000 Palestinian men, women, and children under the watchful eyes of the Israel army. A body count by the International committee of the Red Cross revealed 2750 dead, the real figure is thought to be much higher and may never be known.

OYON QARA Massacre (RISHON LEZION): 20 May 1990, an Israeli soldier lined up Palestinian labourers and murdered seven of them with a sub-machine gun. 13 Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces in subsequent demonstrations at the massacre.

AL-AQSA MOSQUE Massacre: 8 October 1990, Israeli police opened fire on worshippers in al-Aqsa mosque killing 22 people.

THE IBRAHIMI MOSQUE Massacre: 25 February 1994, A Jewish terrorist, from Keryat Arba' settlement massacred 60 worshippers in the Ibrahimi Mosque in al-Khalil (Hebron) and wounded 200. Later massive demonstrations took to the streets of Palestine and the Zionist army responded with live ammunition killing 23 and wounding hundreds more. There were 3 Jewishgunners, not just one.

THE JABALIA Massacre: 28 March 1994, A Jewish undercover policeman opened fire on Palestinian activists brutally killing 6 and injuring 49. Some of the wounded activists were taken out of their cars and shot in the head.

ERETZ CHECKPOINT Massacre: 17 July 1994, Palestinian sources reported that the occupation forces had committed Sunday morning a disgusting massacre against Palestinian workers at Eretz Checkpoint. Eyewitnesses and Israeli sources reported that 11 Palestinians have been shot dead and 200 injured. Israeli sources also reported that 21 Israeli soldiers including 1 settler were injured. Two soldiers were shot by bullets, one died. As reported by Palestinian and Israeli sources, the scene was described as a war zone which lasted for 6 hours. Four Israeli tanks and helicopters were brought by the occupation forces, while a number of settlers were taking part in firing at Palestinians. Protests had spread all over the Occupied Territories. In Gaza, Palestinians raised black flags and called for revenge. In Ramallah, shops closed while several clashes were reported. Several clashes were reported at Hebron University yesterday, and two Palestinians were shot in Hebron.

These are just some of the massacres committed against the Palestinians by the Zionists. If the raids on southern Lebanon old and new were to be taken into account the true magnitude of Zionist crimes against humanity could start to emerge. If one were to go into the gruesome details of the atrocities committed in 1948 the "mopping up operations", the deliberate humiliation and massacres of Arabs and the desecration of the holy places of both Muslim and Christian as well as the looting of these holy places and personal property by the Israeli army and settlers; one might just start to appreciate what Zionism is all about.

Is it justification enough to say murderers were following murderous Jehovah's instructions? Do these not show "he" is a blood-thirsty ghoul?

"Destroy all of the land; beat down their pillars and break their statues and waste all of their high places, cleansing the land and dwelling in it, for I have given it to you for a possession." Numbers 33:52,53

"And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city both men and women, young and old and ox and sheep and ass with the edge of the sword." Joshua 6:21

Questions I need to ask you:

10        ZIONIST RACISM - EVILLY IN CONTROL

(From various sources)

Many, especially American citizens, would like to believe that the USA is the land of the brave and the free. But the evidence is very much to the contrary. It is a savage jungle, where exploitation and social pressures are at a maximum, where racial hatred and material pursuits are made into artforms, where propaganda and Untruth, supported by a mendacious media, rule supreme. It is a Zionist colony in which the non-Zionist populace is kept grazing like sheep in the ever-expanding shopping malls, oblivious to the damage being done to them, and the world, by their Zionist prison wardens. Most are kept ignorant of true facts about the world, about true facts of who rules America, and of true facts of the US racist, Zionist policy which will rebound upon it in due course. For all its wealth, the US is bankrupt, owing some $56 TRILLION to its Zionist rulers. Below is further data supporting this view.

Even as I write these newsletters, the tide is turning, and Americans are becoming more aware that they have, in fact, been kept as fattening cows to be slaughtered and as sheep to be fleeced. They are awakening en masse, and their anger is understandable. But, it will be just one more stimulus to manifest the Terminal Madness of the Endtime in due course. And the end result of all this will prove, beyond all doubt, that evil beings are cursed by their own evilness.

Here is some data directly from the World Wide Web:

Media suppresses identity of these government heads. America's rulers - they are all racist jews! ( For racist Jews, translate Ontological Zionists - editor).

Here is their name and position in the U.S. Government:

Those of us who follow US foreign policy closely know it is a manifestation of Zionism no less. Here is the reason: Clinton Names Racist Jews

Ambassadors to Major Countries.

Clinton turns U.S. Foreign Service over to the Racist Jewish Mafia. The U.S. Foreign Service is made up of 164 Embassies worldwide. However, Clinton has named Jews as ambassadors to the most important countries in the world. This give the International Racist Jewish Mafia tremendous influence to promote their "special agenda". Never before in American history have so many Jews been appointed as U.S. Ambassadors. They are all members of powerful Jewish organizations. These are hardened supporters of the Satanic state of Israel. It is impossible for them to put the interests of America ahead of their Zionist state. None would hold these ambassadorships unless they were members of the ruling Jewish elite. Here is their listing which you will never see in the daily press.

GERMANY - Ambassador John C. Kornblum

FRANCE - Ambassador Felix Rohatyn (Rohatyn is the former partner in the Jewish Lazard Freres investment bank.)

POLAND - Ambassador Daniel Fried

DENMARK - Ambassador Edward E. Elson (The Elson family made a fortune in textile business and are big contributors to the Democratic Party.)

HUNGARY - Ambassador Donald M. Blinken (Budapest has the largest Jewish population in Europe, some 125,000 Jews, only exceeded by Paris. Thus Blinken can protect their financial interests.)

ROMANIA - Ambassador Alfred H. Moses (At one time Romania was ruled by an all-Jewish Communist Party under Anna Paulka. Six members of the Rumanian Senate, three of them priests, objected to Clinton 's 1994 appointment of Moses starting that he was closely connected to the fallen Communist Ceausescu regime.)

BELGIUM - Ambassador Alan J. Blinken (Antwept, Belgium is the diamond capital of the world next to Tel Aviv. The diamond business is totally Jew-controlled. Blinken is related to the Blinken ambassador to Hungary.)

BELARUS - Ambassador Kenneth S. Yalowitz (Belarus is located between Poland and Russia. It once had a huge Jewish population. They still have interest there.)

SOUTH AFRICA - Ambassador James A. Joseph (The Jewish Oppenheimer family controls this gold mining capital of the world. The Jewish-run South African Communist Party and the ANC now control the government and loyally do the bidding of the gold interests.)

NORWAY - Ambassador David B. Hermelin (Hermelin is a Michigan multi-millionaire real estate developer and president of the World Jewish ORT Union. His owns Palace Sports and Entertainment, The Palace of Auburn Hills and the Pine Knob Music Theater.)

SWITZERLAND - Ambassador Madeleine M. Kunin (Kunin is the former Democratic governor of Vermont. Her four children attended a Hebrew school. The New York Times of Oct. 4, 1997 says she, "doggedly pursues the Swiss on the issue of gold for holocaust survivors".)

INDIA - Ambassador Frank G. Wisner (India, an economic powerhouse has long sided with the Arabs against Israel and needs more Zionist control.)

TURKEY - Ambassador Marc Grossman (Turkey is the only Middle East border country with a military alliance with Israel. They pose a threat to Syria and Iraq over long simmering border dispute. One must recall how they used armed might to seize one-third of Cyprus. Also, the Turks are related by blood to the Khazar Jews.)

NEW ZEALAND - Ambassador Josiah H. Beeman

EGYPT - Ambassador Daniel C. Kurtzer (Egypt is the recipient of the second largest amount of U.S. foreign aid. This is to "buy off" Israel's southern front. Any hostility toward Israel would end the aid.)

SWEDEN - Ambassador Thomas L. Siebert

MOROCCO - Ambassador Marc C. Ginsberg

SINGAPORE - Ambassador Timothy A. Chorba

ZAMBIA - Ambassador Arlene Render

BRAZIL - Ambassador Melvyn Levitsky (This is South America's largest country and economic powerhouse. Jews have huge investments here.)

BOLIVIA - Ambassador Curt W. Kamman (This is another mineral rich country; copper, magnesium, lead, etc.)

MEXICO - Ambassador Jeffrey Davidow (Davidow was formerly Assistant Sec of State for South America under Albright.)

CANADA - Ambassador Gordon Griffin (Thus Clinton has given both US border neighbors, Mexico and Canada, to Jewish operatives.)

CUBA - U.S. Interest Head, Michael G. Kozak

This must surely go to the Israeli Jewish Zionist businessman Nissim Zvili who sold to Iran - Israel's declared mortal enemy - material to produce mustard and nerve gas and equipment to build munitions plants for chemical warheads from 1990-1995. For the sake of a quick buck, he has ensured a conflagrational termination to all business, in due course, in the region. Where will he spend his profits then?

FROM THE PAGES OF HISTORY

Here is a continuation of extracts from The Jewish Mentality Book I by Michael A. Hoffman II.

It is the Zionists who have such tremendous insecurities about their contributions to world history and if truth be told, a clandestine knowledge of the truth of their critics' accusations, so that they must resort to the jailer's turnkey to maintain their world hegemony. It is because the truth carries its own special sting that Jews call for the imprisonment of their intellectual critics. The persecution trombone will inevitably squeak out a long row of shrill notes at this juncture. At long last, a commonsense approach to this subject must be argued. If Jews habitually lie and cheat whose fault is it if they are "persecuted" as they call it?

The more proper word is prosecuted. Moreover, in the annals of history the Irish have been among the most persecuted people on earth. The treatment of the Germans in the U.S. during World War One bordered on a lynch-mob mentality and at the end of World War Two, millions of German civilians perished as a result of deliberate mass expulsions and population transfers. Thanks to Jewish influence over the media of mass communications, little or none of this is known to the public. More importantly, we are enjoined to speak the truth no matter what the consequences, come what may. It is the mentality of a slave to hold back or suppress the truth because of what may result from having spoken or written it. The "poisecution" claim of the Khazars is no grounds for refusing to tell the truth about them.

All learning is based upon curiosity and curiosity is the unfettered exploration of that which is interesting. The weird halo of immunity which surrounds the Jewish nation is a highly interesting sanction and no scholar must be faulted for defying it. To pretend that we must approach the Jewish question with some special reverence and reserve, fearful of causing offense, is a totalitarian expectation. All investigations must be free and impartial and lead wherever the evidence leads; anything less is Orwellian. Only in the presence of a dictator are we compelled to exhibit a fawning sycophancy and certain Jews have become every inch the dictators of what constitutes the "proper" bounds of writing and research, as surely as any Ming Dynasty emperor or Stalinist commissar decreed the perimeters for scholars in those eras. Such a dictatorship of the mind can only be rightfully resented.

What is clear from this debate is that either one heritage or the other must be indicted as evil: either Western Civilization was irredeemably evil for having prosecuted and punished the saints and angels who comprised God's Chosen Representatives on Earth, or Judaism is an evil creed which instills in its followers a willingness to lie, cheat and murder those whom their Talmud dehumanizes as goyim, resulting in natural resistance from non-Jews. Isn't it interesting that while it is considered utterly correct, moral and proper to paint the whole of Western Civilization as evil for alleged crimes against the Jews, it has been ruled totally inadmissible, immoral and racist to condemn Judaism as an evil force?

In this matter of the Talmud and the allegation that Jews ferociously hate and despise non-Jews as part of their religious instruction, we can argue from a body of facts and documentation which will send those liberals who are always calling for dialogue, scurrying for the nearest police station to demand our arrest.

They do not want and cannot endure a frank, open dialogue on the contents of the Jewish sacred book, the Talmud, or on the extent to which Judaism is infected with institutional racism and hatred for non-Jews. Like any superstitious zealot, they are content to conform to the official decree of the state religion of "Holocaust" piety. Critical analysis and thinking independent of received opinion--faculties cited as absolutely indispensable by liberals when considering any other religion--are discarded when it comes to Judaism. Here one is abjured only to bend the knee, tip the hat and be on one's way.

This cowardly betrayal of our God-given powers of reason--also advocated by conservatives--should anger any researcher or scholar worth his or her salt and that anger ought to be translated into the most rigorous and thorough, impartial examination of Judaism it is within our power to render. Such an examination, to be valid, must begin with the Jewish sources themselves.

Whenever the subject of hatred and racism in the Talmud is raised, certain Jewish rabbis nearly always respond with a barrage of name-calling, coupled with a statement that the Talmud is free of all such negativity. This is the official position, promoted in the media intended for consumption by Gentiles. But let us see what the Jews say in publications intended for each other. The Jewish Press is reputed to be the largest Jewish newspaper in America. Politicians court it for endorsements and orthodox Jews consult it for instruction. Rabbi Simcha Cohen writes an authoritative teaching column in The Jewish Press entitled, "Halachic Questions." In his column Rabbi Cohen stated, concerning the Talmud's view of "heathens," that is, non-Jews, that they are "animals." Rabbi Cohen writes that the Talmudic teaching that non-Jews are animals can be found in the Talmud books Gemara Kiddushin 68a and Metzia 114b. (The Jewish Press, Feb. 19, 1988, p. 10A).

Jewish men are admonished not to marry a non-Jewish women because such women all have the status of zona that is, prostitutes. According to Rabbi Samuel A. Turk, writing in The Jewish Press of June 22, 1990, p. 38, quoting the halachic authority, Gentiles are not allowed to marry into Israel because Israel must have within it "no harlot;" and "neither shall there be a sodomite." In other words, non-Jewish men are all regarded as homosexuals and non-Jewish women are all regarded as prostitutes.

Furthermore, according to Rabbi Simcha Cohen, if a Jewish woman marries a Gentile man, she becomes a zona, that is to say, a prostitute. Rabbi Cohen: "... marriage to a Gentile can never be sanctified or condoned, such a liaison classifies the woman as a zona...common parlance interprets the term zona to refer to a prostitute ..."

This is qualified by Talmudic authorities in that a Jewish woman would not be called a zona who conducted a prostitution service exclusively with Jewish men: "Indeed, premarital sex of a Jewish woman to a Jewish man does not automatically brand the woman a zona ..." A Jewish woman becomes a prostitute or zona in the eyes of the Talmud only when she marries or otherwise has sexual relations with a non-Jew. (Jewish Press, Feb. 19, 1988, p. 8C).

The Talmudic view of non-Jewish women as prostitutes is widespread among Jews. The Yiddish word for a Gentile woman is shiksa, which means whore, from the Hebrew root word, sheigetz ("abomination"). The Yiddish word for Gentile girls is shikselke, meaning "little female abomination." (Chaim Bermant, "Some Carefully and Carelessly Chosen Words, Jewish Chronicle, May 17, 1991).

These unlovely racist-Jewish appellations have been transliterated into English slang in American popular culture in the use of the word bimbo ("stupid whore") as an insulting description of good-looking, blonde White women. A classic example of the Jewish hatred of such women was exhibited by Lisa Schwarzbaum in her essay entitled "Blonde Ambition," which was published in the NY Daily News: "The garden-variety bimbo of today is a woman who is inescapably blonde, inevitably busty and invariably about as intellectual as a Cheez - Doodle ... She beams her 40-watt brilliance ... She's called Jessica or Donna or Marla, and she comes to our attention because she has been spotted in a motel room with a tele-evangelist ... City women swear we wouldn't want to trade our higher consciousness for their low wattage. We bemoan their unfeminist feminine wiles." (NY Daily News, May 27, 1990).

Could it possibly be inferred from Miz Schwarzbaum's writing that she is guilty of the "group libel" of Gentile women? Imagine the howls of condemnation and the cries for imprisonment were a White Christian woman to pen an article entitled, "Jewish Feminist Ambition." The bimbo insult, like so many other racist Jewish epithets, has been picked up by the heartland and the mainstream and resounds through small town America as a self-hating put-down used by Gentile women against other Gentile women. The racist nature of this insult isn't even glimpsed, nor does any "anti-racist" campaigner trace its origin in the depths of institutionalized Jewish contempt for Gentile women.

With regard to the "Who is a Jew" debate, it is officially stated in the Establishment media, that any Gentile, if sincerely converted to Judaism under the auspices of properly constituted orthodox rabbinic authority, becomes a Jew. However this is by no means the unanimous view of the rabbis themselves or of the Talmud. In fact, the Talmud decrees that "... a Gentile can obtain some rights when he is powerful and especially when he poses a threat to Jews." (Israel Shahak, Ha'aretz. April 5, 1990).

At present, the Israeli state is dependent upon the good will of the Gentiles of the West for financial support, military aid and cooperation in propagating Israeli versions of current events and history. Therefore, at present, Gentiles are accepted as Jews if they convert, have the proper sincerity and are examined and received by the strict orthodox rabbis. To do otherwise would be to reveal that Judaism is a religion of self worship (the Jewish race is itself god), based upon the notion of Jews being the Master Race.

For those who search the Jewish scriptures, an inner teaching on the status of Gentile converts to Judaism is revealed, a teaching which awaits enforcement at a later date, when Jews are all-powerful, but which points to a mentality of clandestine contempt orthodox Jews have toward converts to Judaism. Hence Rabbi Helbo in the Talmud passage T.B. Yebamos 109b states, "Proselytes are hurtful to Israel and a sore on the skin." (For confirmation of this passage, see Rabbi Samuel Turk, Jewish Press, Feb. 19, 1988, p. 10). A further indication of the true status of the Gentile convert to Judaism can be found in the fact that the marriage of a Jewish priest to a Gentile convert is prohibited (Simcha Cohen, Jewish Press, Feb. 19, 1988, p. 10a).

More ominous is the statement of the pre-eminent Jewish rabbi of antiquity, Shimon Ben Yohai, to whom the Jewish holiday of Lag B'omer is dedicated. Rabbi Yohai stated, "Even the best of the Gentiles should all be killed." (Isidore Singer, "Gentiles", Funk and Wagnalls Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 617, 1907 edition; also cf. Talmud-Minor Tractates, Soferim 15, Rule 10). Assuming that the "best of the Gentiles," in Jewish eyes would be those who seek to become Jews, one can suppose that Rabbi Yohai's statement will at some future date warrant the elimination of those Gentiles in the Israeli ranks who carry the label of convert. Though the pre-eminent Jewish law interpreter of antiquity has commanded their death, permission to delay or counteract Jewish law is given where Gentiles are still in a position to create a danger for Jews.

In discussing the Talmudic prohibition of giving food cooked specifically for Jews to either "Gentiles or dogs," an exception is allowed: "... the Jews were permitted in some cases to serve Gentiles food cooked only for Jews. For example, permission was given in a case where a Gentile might feel insulted enough to cause a danger to Jews." (Israel Shahak, Ha'aretz, April 5, 1990).

That contempt for converts is widespread, if seldom remarked upon in the controlled, secular media. In the Ask-the-Jewish-Lawyer column of the Canadian Jewish News, a Jewish mother whose son married a German woman who converted to Judaism wrote the following: "We never wanted her as our in-law. She cannot give us "naches" (the feeling you get when your one-year-old starts hobbling for the first time), being of a heritage that we do not respect as my husband is a Holocaust survivor. We do not consider her conversion to Judaism valid. I told my son I forbid this marital union. I would like to have his name erased from our family name. How can we do this? We are preparing a will. Will one dollar for him be enough...?" Attorney John Syrtash replied as follows: "...technically you do not have to leave him anything in your will as a matter of law. However, as a precaution I would put a nominal $500 in the will, along with an express statement in the will explaining why the amount is so low as it is, drafted concisely and without reference to your ethnic prejudices ... If you are sufficiently paranoid you may even obtain a letter from a qualified psychiatrist when revising your will to state that at the time you signed it you were clear-headed and knew exactly what you were doing." ("A Lawyer Replies," Canadian Jewish News, Nov. 23, 1989, p. 12). The reference to "sufficient paranoia" is apposite as we wade further into the mad-house of Jewish law and the Jewish mentality it has bred.

One of the big areas of concentration in yeshiva schools (Talmud seminaries) is the lofty subject of the women's menstrual flow. This august topic featured prominently in one Talmud class as reported by the Los Angeles Times: "The Talmudic lesson last Monday was on distinguishing menstrual blood stains on a woman's garment from blood spots possibly caused by other sources." The Times states that it is important for rabbis to be able to distinguish menstrual blood stains on women's clothing from "... visible blood stains ... caused by lice, bed bugs or blood spattered in a butcher shop." (John Dart, "Jewish Scholars Mark 7-Year Study Cycle, L.A. Times, April 28, 1990, p.F15). The Jewess Evelyn Kaye states: "In the code of Jewish law...there are 85 pages of rules, regulations and interpretations covering every minute aspect of the menstrual cycle ... The rabbis drew up a series of definitions for 'Regular Periods' ... 'Irregular periods,' which they divide up into Lunar cycles, Same-Interval cycles and 30 Day Cycles." (The Hole in the Sheet).

This fascination with morbid blood is evidenced in the Jewish infant circumcision ritual or bris in the course of which blood from the lacerated penis is sucked through a glass tube by a mohel (rabbi who specializes in circumcisions) in an act known as metzitza. According to the rule of the Shulchan Aruch (the codification of the Talmudic Mishnah), any mohel who dispenses with the blood-sucking must be "removed from his post." Using a surgical clamp to prevent bleeding also renders a bris "null and void." According to the Talmud there must be some bleeding resulting from the bris. "Using a clamp to prevent bleeding defeats one of the purposes of the ritual and makes it invalid." (Cf. "Doctor Challenges Female Mohel's Status," Canadian Jewish News, Jan. 21, 1993, p. 31).

Israel Shahak talks about the "shock" that is "bound to occur" if people actually "find out the truth ... about ... Judaism ... what Judaism was really like when Jews were governed by that Halacha" ("the correct path," i.e as prescribed in the Talmud). Shahak states: "As to the concept of 'saving souls,' (piku'ach nefesh) the Talmudic literature makes it clear to anyone who reads it, even cursorily, that this concept is inapplicable to Gentiles. In principle it is forbidden for Jews, including Jewish doctors, to save the life of a Gentile, for what we could call humanitarian reasons. Saving the life of a Gentile and thereby violating the Sabbath is even more strictly forbidden. However, in the case of 'saving the soul' of a Jew, such violation of the Sabbath is not only mandatory it is counted as a good deed ... There have been endless Halachic debates, which still continue today, on whether 'soul saving' should apply only to Jews or whether Jewish fear of Gentiles and their enmity should result in a dispensation to save Gentile lives ... In Israel a few years ago, the Haredi 'experts' for such matters ruled that a Jewish doctor, when he is afraid that the authorities of any state may revoke his license if he refuses to treat Gentiles ... can obtain a dispensation, provided that during the treatment he thinks about the dispensation rather than about the treatment itself." (Israel Shahak, "The Status of the Gentile in Jewish Religious Law and Israeli Politics," Ha'aretz, April 5, 1990).

Prof. Shahak illuminates a central underlying tenet of Judaism: that it does not express its overwhelming hostility to the non-Jewish world where it lacks the political and military might to do so, but once it possesses that might, it shall move swiftly against the Gentiles: "... according to Halacha a Gentile does not possess any self-evident rights vis-a-vis a Jew. A Gentile can obtain some rights when he is powerful and especially when he poses a threat to Jews. The more a Gentile threatens Jewish lives, the more Halachic rights he will be granted.

"It therefore becomes clear that ... if the Arabs do not have chemical weapons, if their armies become weaker, and if the Intifada (Palestinian uprising) is crushed, Halacha will not only prohibit any retreat from the territories, but it will also prescribe the beginning of the expulsion of the Gentiles, especially of the Christians, along with the destruction of their churches. If a miracle happens and ... Israeli influence in the U.S. increases a thousand-fold, the Halacha will compel us to expel all Gentiles not only from all of Palestine but also from 'all places which we shall conquer..." (Israel Shahak, op. cit.).

Jewish scholar Shahak gives the Talmudic teaching on Christianity and how it is to be treated when Jews are strong: "... the churches of the Christians in Palestine ... are places of idolatry. Conversely we are obliged by our religion (Torah) to destroy all idolatry and idol worshippers and to pursue it until we obliterate it from all of our country and from all the places which we conquer." (Shahak, op. cit.).

The words of Israeli Talmud scholar Israel Shahak, first published in the Israeli national newspaper Ha'aretz, will come as news to most non-Jews. Let us tread further down the path of Jewish hatred for non-Jews. Here is the late Rabbi Meir Kahane advocating in 1990 the mass destruction of the German people: "When it comes to the Amalek of our times, Germany, there is an on-going war, a never-ending war, a war for generations ... There can never be forgiveness or contact or relations or anything to do with them. They are beyond the pale and daily, the Jew must pray for the ultimate destruction of a German people that never received an iota of the punishment they deserved ... If the Almighty ever allows me to become Prime Minister of Israel ... there will be nothing but an Amalek whose memory we will blot out as much as possible until the great day when the Almighty finishes the mitzvah of vengeance." (Rabbi Meir Kahane, "Halachic Overview," The Jewish Press, Oct. 12, 1990, p. 49).

In March of l986, the Israeli army's chief chaplain on the occupied West Bank, Rabbi Shmuel Derlich, distributed a 1,000 word pastoral letter to Jewish soldiers calling for the total extermination of Amalek. "Derlich wrote that it is the duty of 'a king in Israel ... to eradicate Amalek without leaving any trace ... one must show no pity for any creature from the nation of Amalek--man, woman, child ... There is no doubt that in the last generation we met the Amalekite enemy ... in the form of the German nation,' he wrote." Jerusalem Post, May 17, 1986.

Harvard University's Jewish professor of law, Alan Dershowitz, who was cited earlier lying about revisionist Bradley R. Smith, in his book, Chutzpah, stated, "The rebuilding of postwar Germany into one of the world's most affluent nations is a moral disgrace. A minimal appropriate response to the collective responsibility of the German people for the crimes of their leaders ... should have been a generation of poverty." Janet DeLynn (a.k.a. DeLynnski): "...I am glad Israel has the atomic bomb, and the continued existence of Israel is the only cause for which I consider it justifiable to use nuclear weapons ... maybe we could have tried the A-bomb on Germany rather than Japan ... What practically speaking, can one do with a nation (Germany) in which virtually everyone over the age of ten, twelve, fifteen ... was either a participant in or accessory to murder?" (Testimony: Contemporary Writers Make the Holocaust Personal, p. 65, quoted in Instauration, May, 1990, pp. 20-21).

"Rabbi Charles Rosenzweig of West Bloomfield, Michigan, stated that 'Germany's guilt is absolute' and that forgiveness 'is not possible." Dov Shilansky, Speaker of the Israeli Knesset, said that 'Even in a thousand years, the shame of Germany will not be erased." (Liberty, July, 1990, p. 14). "I had avoided Germany because I did not choose to try to keep a civil tongue or civil face among those I felt would have stood by while my children and I were murdered ... And I felt I knew all I cared to know then about German history and the German soul. On both, every Jew is a specialist." (A.M. Rosenthal, Press-Enterprise, [Riverside, Calif.], April 27, 1990. Mr. Rosenthal is the former managing editor of the N.Y. Times). "In history, Germany was not the only criminal nation, just the most vile." (A.M. Rosenthal, "Our German Business," N.Y. Times, September 22, 1992, p.27).

"One of those rankling questions is why is it that Germany, which visited upon the whole world, and especially upon the Jewish world--an unprecedented hell of war, barbarism and assembly-line killing of millions of Jews, should have turned out to be a prosperous, powerful and even prestigious country. We wonder why in heaven's name, this country of savage murderers should have risen from the ashes of defeat to become a land of tranquillity with a standard of living far above those countries which sacrificed the flower of their youth to stop the Germans from enslaving the entire world." (Rabbi David B. Hollander, "The Torah," Jewish Press, December 8, 1989).

Imagine that a former mental patient, who now heads the Texas Ku Klux Klan, is driving through the Black ghetto in Houston with his grandchildren and rocks are thrown at his car by Black demonstrators. The Ku Kluxer immediately stops his car, hops out and indiscriminately opens fire with an automatic pistol, missing the Blacks who threw the rocks and killing a Black shopkeeper who had nothing to do with the incident while also wounding one of his Black customers. The Klan leader then walks through the Black ghetto firing his weapon, kicking at debris and shouting "Nigger." What would have been the reaction of the U.S. and international media to such a case? What would be the Klansman's well-deserved sentence? 300 years in prison? 500 years? Death by lethal injection? A case equivalent to this happened in the Israeli state. Moshe Levinger, a Jew who spent "some of his youth" in a Swiss psychiatric facility, is the head of the Gush Emunim, a Zionist settler group which believes that Arabs "are dogs" and that Palestinian land must be taken by force of arms. On Sept. 30, 1988, Rabbi Levinger was driving through the Palestinian village of Hebron when his car was hit by stones. "... according to numerous witnesses, Levinger parked his car from harm's way and then walked determinedly toward the demonstrators, firing his pistol indiscriminately. Ibrahim Bali, an Arab textile salesman was buying new shoes for his daughter when he heard the shooting. He was standing outside a shop when a bullet tore through his shoulder. A bullet also ripped into the chest of Khayed Salah, who was about to close the metal shutters of his shoe store.

The Israeli Army company commander who witnessed the shooting said that after the rabbi fired his weapon, he walked down the road screaming, 'You're dogs,' at Arab vendors, kicking over vegetable crates and flower containers..." (Robert I. Friedman, Zealots for Zion, pp. 23, 29, 37-38). He was sentenced to serve five months in prison and was honored at a celebration prior to beginning his sentence which was attended by well-wishers including Israeli General Yitzhak Mordecai, military commander of the West Bank as well as the President of Israel, Chaim Herzog. A religious ruling on Rabbi Levinger's attack was prepared by Rabbi Moshe Neriya and published in the national Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz of May 13, 1989, in which the rabbi ruled that every Jew has the duty "to shoot [Arabs] left and right without thinking and without hesitating." Rabbi Moshe Levinger was released from prison after serving two and one-half months of his sentence. The sentence reflected the religious opinion of Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, who has offered "justification for the view that the spilling of non-Jewish blood was a lesser offense than the spilling of Jewish blood. 'Any trial based on the assumption that Jews and goyim are equal, is a total travesty of justice,' he said. (N.Y. Times, June 6, 1989, p. 5).

Has the reader even heard of Rabbi Levinger much less what he did or the ten weeks he spent in jail for the murder of a Palestinian bystander? In July of 1983, Levinger's son-in law and other members of the Zionist Makhteret (Underground), described as "the most violent anti-Arab terrorist organization since the birth of the Jewish state ... burst into the courtyard of the Islamic College in Hebron during a noon lunch break, tossing a grenade and spraying machine gun fire. Three Palestinian students were killed and thirty-three injured. 'Whoever did this,' declared Rabbi Levinger, 'has sanctified God's name in public."

In May of 1990, 21 year old Israeli Amri Popper walked to the Rishon le Zion market where Palestinian day labourers awaited work. Popper opened fire on them with an assault rifle, killing seven men and wounding ten. Israeli motorists got out of their cars and danced the hora among the carnage. As the Palestinians bled to death, one dancing Jew asked, "What, only seven dead?" The Israeli army subsequently shot to death seven more Palestinians on the same day and wounded several hundred more.

"There is no doubt that the Rishon le Zion gunman acted within a society in which the norm exists that Arab life is cheap ... treating Levinger like a hero have created this norm..." (L.A. Times, May 23, 1990, p. 4).

(As a promise to seekers of truth,
and as a threat to Zionists,
more next month - editor.)

I have no doubt many of us were angered as we read the atrocities described in the above pages. Hence, a call for patience is appropriate. In believing this mess will be rectified and soon, we must deal with our anger as best we can. I close with a short poem (number 54 from my Poetry Book, Volume One):

****

J S Chiappalone. Copyright 1998 .

Please address all correspondence to

Annwn Publications at PO Box 28, Malanda, 4885, Qld, Australia.

Books
Tapes
Order Form
The Annwn Main Page