|
| Look at it our way |
Change. A simple word with a seemingly simple definition. If you are
going to a different destination than previously planned, you change
your direction. If the clothes you are wearing are tattered and torn,
you change your outfit. In these simple cases the dilemma was realized,
and appropriate action was taken to rectify it.
But these scenarios involve only an individual choice, not a collective
decision. In the case of a co-curricular recognition assembly (formerly
known as the pep rally), change affects more than one persons
life.
Two-thousand students are herded into Gymnasium #3 for a prescribed
double-dose of school spirit. Students, being unresponsive to the
usual introduction to each member of a varsity sports team, appear
to be jaded and unwilling to participate. Thus, administrators - who
feel theyve done everything they possibly could - conclude that
this generation of students just doesnt have the ability to
possess and express school spirit.
The administration is wrong.
Times have changed. Greater opportunities for the music, art and scholastic
programs and a rise in school populations have given students other
activities and, hence, other interests in which to invest their spirit.
This being said, why havent pep rallies evolved with the interests
of the student body? Many attempts had been made to make pep rallies
more enjoyable, still even these have been aimed at the wrong target.
Students can only take so many Tug O Wars.
In February, five Playwickian editors held up large, paper signs that
conveyed their disapproval for the outdated manner in which Neshaminys
pep rallies had been run. Although amusing, these signs were not meant
to attract negative attention. In fact, the humor that was used was
largely satirical - creating a powerful combination of politics and
laughter (like the election skits of Saturday Night Live).
Protesting leads to change - a simple action with a seemingly simple
reaction. However, with protesting comes the outcry of people who
dont understand the viewpoint of the protesters.
To make things perfectly clear, there was no opposition to sports
teams, cheerleaders or gym night captains. There is a great deal of
respect for these groups, for it is clearly known that a great deal
of time and energy is spent to make them succeed. Instead, the protest
was about the fact that they were the only groups represented.
Sports teams are not the only groups working to the bone. For example,
Future Business Leaders of America spend hours upon hours preparing
for their competitions. Musical theater players stay at school until
7:00 p.m. rehearsing their scenes, and then go home and practice even
more.
What do these groups receive other than a side-note on the announcements
or a casual mention at a pep rally?
It is the wish of the five Playwickian editors that all co-curriculars
get equal consideration. It only takes four minutes for the musical
to demonstrate a dance number or five minutes for the Art Club to
play an interactive game of Pictionary with a few members of the audience.
These activities all take time. Therefore, pep rallies should be lengthened.
For something of this magnitude to work, compromises must be made.
It is impossible for more representation to be successful without
more time.
Some of the students and faculty involved in the pep rally were hurt
that everyone in the stands did not appreciate their recognition.
In that case, it is suggested that those few try to imagine a pep
rally on the other extreme where a championship varsity sports team
goes unrecognized, and youre watching a five minute presentation
of the Future Problem Solvers - who are three and ten this season.
That is what it feels like to be underappreciated. |
|