Mathematic, Computer and Internet Solution to
an Integration-Differentiation Problem of General Health Scientific
Programs. Intuitive & Qualitative
Approach.
(First
preliminary draft 11/10/00: Sixth version 02/07/01)
Rodolfo J.
Stusser, MD
Clinical Biostatistics
& Epidemiology Unit
Clinical
Research Centre, 34 # 4501 / 45-47, Playa, Havana, 11300, Cuba.
[Associated
to the Plaza Community Polyclinic,
Havana]
All sciences progress through differentiation-integration scientific programs. In any health scientific research of any program the data matrix of each research responds to a matrix of ideas. Both matrixes could be handled with the calculus of matrixes or other quantitative and/or qualitative mathematical tool. Eleven-million scientific abstracts of facts and hypotheses in the PubMed Internet database, are being searched by the support software qualitative system “ArrowSmith” of Swanson & Smalheiser of the University of Chicago, Ill, to discover new implicit, but unknown scientific hypotheses. The backward enlargement of the PubMed database from the year 1965 and its enrichment with other databases, could achieve about fifteen-million abstracts. The E-Biomed Project of the NIH, 1999, will allow the use through new Internet databases of the papers with the whole results. The present project has the aim to find a mathematical solution and software to the core scientific problem of the Integration Science Program for General Medicine, Nursing, Technology & Public Health. It has been firstly designed with 11 non-mathematical research & research training projects, to seek new integral hypotheses and principles.
In the Viet
Nam War, huge amounts of data were mathematically processed for the USAF (US
Air Force), through mainframe computers to increase the exactitude and
precision in the bombing of targets. The data matrix theory and algebraic
calculus of matrices gave the algorithm for such success (1). [Personal
communication of Spanish Antonio Gonzalez, leading lecturer in mathematics and
statistics in the Havana University, National Centre for Scientific Research,
1968-75]
In 1977, I
finished in our Institute for Health Development, the equivalent to a master in
biostatistics thesis, on "Structure of Mortality Rates in Areas of an
Oriental Region", using multi-factorial analysis with computerized
calculus of correlation matrices (2). [Guided by the Mexican Thalia Harmony,
leading researcher in neurophysiology and neurosciences in Havana University,
National Centre for Scientific Research, 1969-77]
In the
meanwhile, working in medical statistics in our Institute for Oncology &
Radiobiology, I went in depth and understood the balanced rationalist-empiricist
view of scientific research by the outstanding Argentinean Mario Bunge,
physicist and world leading logician of science (3). [Guided by Cuban Ramon
Ventoso, leading lecturer in physics and in logic of science, in Havana
University, National Centre for Scientific Research, 1968-76]
In 1987, I
finished in the latter institute, the equivalent to a Ph.D. thesis on
"Unified Research-Control Forecast for the Cancer Problem in Cuba
1985-2000", using a new integrative approach for that times, using cancer
statistics linear & non-linear forecasts to prioritise cancer research,
prevention, control, and education. [Guided by Cuban Fidel Ilizastigui, Ernesto
de la Torre, Zoilo Marinello, leading physicians in health education and
research in Havana University, National Institutes of Health 1975-2001]
In the last
25 years, with the increasing use of computerized database systems ordering the
research variables and subjects in data matrices, and analysing them with
bi-variate and multivariate methods by means of the calculus of matrices, the
core of the scientific & statistical design and analysis of biomedical
& sociohealth research began to be seen operationally determined by a data
matrix (4).
Moreover,
it could be conceived that in health research design there is at least
interaction of two matrices. A visible data matrix belonging consciously or not
to a generally invisible but real matrix of ideas, which determines in the last
instance the nature of the collection of variables and samples of subjects
selected, and the possibilities of their statistical analyses. This
mathematical picture deduced from the rationalist-empiricist nature of the
scientific hypothesis, is according to this new approach the real heart of
scientific research in the medical & health sciences (3).
In the 90s,
organising and doing research the first five years in the staff of our pointer
Plaza Community Polyclinic, and the last five years associated to it, I was
very stimulated by the complex nature of the correlation between the scientific
objects and hypotheses of the Primary Health Care specialities &
generalities, to develop a series of methodological projects on "general
medical principles & unified medical theory", "necessary new research spaces for
general & family medicine", and "unified approach to medical
& public health scientific methodologies for introductory research
training" since 1994.
The
outstanding Hungarian emigrant Imre Lakatos, mathematician and world-leading
logician of science, in the London School of Economy, UK, synthesized the
theories about the progress of science behind him through the theory of the
“succession of scientific programs” (5). Integrating this Lakatos' theory, with
the differentiation & integration tendencies that appear in the progress of
science stated by the outstanding Russian Bonifati Kedrov, leading world
logician of science too (6), it could be understood better the development of
health sciences.
In the last
seven years, working in a nuclear medicine Clinical Research Centre, I
restarted doing research in one of the most advanced high-technology
transitional sciences of the moment in medicine: "clinical trials of
monoclonal antibodies radio-labelled for radio-immuno-diagnosis &
radiotherapy of some specific cancer sites", within other studies on
diseases as coronary artery disease.
However, I
continued designing "a unified approach to medical & public health
scientific methodologies", "toward a better interrelation in
scientific & statistical hypotheses formation", "health research
policy and system research", "improvement of a known support system
of discovery using Internet databases", and "human global social
basic medical & health research projects to integrate with the human genome
project".
This
eleventh research project, was finished for the International Conference in
Health Research for Development in Bangkok, October 2000, sponsored by the WHO,
COHRED, GFHR, and World Bank. It was the last medical & non-mathematical
research project of my "Integration Science Program for General Medicine,
Nursing, Technology & Public Health", which can be found in: http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/systems/1000/
Unfortunately,
qualitative research in medicine, technology & public health have not been
well seen since the jolt of the forties --when it was definitively accepted the
statistical design & analysis in medical & health research. In nursing,
it is more accepted. The utmost rejection is evidenced when qualitative
research is used to solve general methodological problems of science. This has
been manifested in the obstacles I have found, to publish the projects as are
published the designs & rationales of population and clinical trials, and
to obtain funds from international research agencies & foundations.
However,
without this crucial conceptual obstacle, maybe I would not have conceived this
preliminary, intuitive, and still qualitative mathematical, computer and
Internet solution to the integration science program.
In the last
20 years, took off the transcendental Internet information &
high-technology communication system with its powerful HTML language, with many
possibilities not used yet. The development of the huge Medline database in the
US National Library of Medicine in Bethesda, Md, stimulated the outstanding
American Don R. Swanson, leading scientific informatician of the University of
Chicago in 1985, to create a research heuristic method using scientific results
of abstracts as the scientific material object of inquiry (7).
Swanson
together with the outstanding American psychiatrist Neil R. Smalheiser's in
1995, implemented a support system software in Unix named “ArrowSmith” to
discover new implicit, but unknown scientific hypothesis in the Medline
database, and other scientific databases in Internet (8).
The initial
E-Biomed Project posted in Internet early in 1999 by the outstanding Harold
Varmus, leading biomedical researcher, then still Director of the National
Institutes of Health at Bethesda, together with Lipman, Brown, Kafatos, Gannon,
Fauci, and others, stated the brilliant aim to post in Internet databases
through a special system in the National Library of Medicine, all the referred
and even non referred complete scientific papers in the 21-century. This
historical utmost E-Biomed Project with the already existence of the ArrowSmith
discovery system, originated some comments that I emailed to Varmus'
office.
One of the
comments, out of some global scientific integration matters, was a proposal to
Varmus on July 5, 1999, to include in the E-Biomed initiative, an enlargement
of the extent of PubMed Internet data base. This could consist, in the one
hand, in the inclusion in a transversal version the 1965-1999 review articles
in full text. In the other hand, it could be in a longitudinal version
embodying 100-150 or more words English abstracts of the papers published in
Journals (including editorials) and books (using forewords) of the world until
the 19 and even 18 century, to increase the ArrowSmith potency.
With the
above realities and prospects for the research of the world main scientific
results as scientific material of a new type of systematic research in this
Information Era, the logical hypothesis here is to integrate qualitatively some
elements of the "differential and integral calculus" of Newton and
Leibniz, into the framework of the "hyperspaces" of Riemann
n-dimension geometry and Einstein space-temporal development, with an structural
and functional "calculus of matrices", using the
"hyperlinks" that gives the HTML language of Internet, with powerful
computers, and high-tech. communications, in a new generation of support
research system of discovery to solve:
1. The inductive-like integration of the
several results and principles of all the main differentiation programs in a
few general medical, nursing, technological, and sanitarian integral principles
of their interrelation in a axiomatic-like unified system for non-mathematical
sciences,
2. The deductive-like differentiation of
hypothetical results from the general and integral principles of interrelation
to new differentiation and integration programs,
3. The inductive-like integration of the
results of the biological and social differentiation programs of the human
individual and family, for the general and family medicine, nursing, and
technology.
4. The inductive-like integration of the
results of the latter results, including the human community and population,
for the general public health,
5. The inductive-like integration of the
two latter results, including country and region of countries, for the global
medicine, nursing, technology, and public health,
6. The deductive-like differentiation of
hypothetical results from the more general integral principles discovered in
the latter integrations for new differentiation and integration programs,
Finally,
the operation of the integration of the mixed matrices of data & ideas in
the Internet bases of abstracts, to obtain general and special knowledge, will
say the last word.
These new
developments could begin to be in this 21-century the so desired
high-technological substratum for the high-level scientific training and
research of the general physician, nurse, technologist, and sanitarian
researchers, and for a parallel and even more convergent progress of the
general medical, nursing, technological & public health sciences in very
complex integration problems stated for them, but not even began to be solved
in the 20-century yet.
Nevertheless,
to be able to start this research, it would need a great international
collaboration with high-technology communications, multi-disciplinary teams of
very open physicians, nurses, technologists, sanitarians, natural and social
scientists, logicians, mathematicians, computer scientists, and Internet
scientists, and a very open scientific infrastructure and environment similar
as the one that has the Santa Fe Institute, in New Mexico, USA.
References
1. Defares JG, Sneddon IN. An Introduction
to The Mathematics of Medicine and Biology. Havana: Science and Technique,
1964.
2. Morrison D. Multivariate Statistical
Methods. II ed. New York: Mc Grow-Hill Books, 1976.
3. Bunge M. Scientific Research. Strategy
and Philosophy. Havana, Science and Technique, 1969.
4. Samaja J. Conference in Scientific
Methodology. Workshop of Latin American PAHO/WHO Experts, Havana, 1989.
5. Lakatos I. Falsification and the
methodology of scientific research programmes. In Criticism and the Growth of
Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1974.
6. Kedrov BM. Classification of Sciences.
Moscow: Progress, 1973.
7. Swanson DR. Migraine and magnesium:
Eleven neglected connections. Perspectives Biol & Med 1988;31:526-556.
8. Smalheiser NR, Swanson DR. Using
Arrowsmith: a computer-assisted approach to formulating and assessing
scientific hypotheses. Comp. Meth. Prog. Biomed. 1998;57:149-153.
E-mails:
Integration Science Program for World Medicine & Health
Brief C.V with Portrait
Back to the Index Page
Created on December 12, 2000; Refreshed on February 14, 2001