|
Contents and links:
Helga's retina
Ron Douglas:
|
June 2 (1998)
The primate retina is a bit more complex than the retina of a turtle. In general the cells are much smaller and more densely packed. This makes it substantially more difficult to investigate the morphologic features of these retinas which is one of the reasons why so much research is done on cold blooded species. Still, many features of the monkey retina bear a striking similarity
to the turtle retina (hope my colleagues will forgive me for making this
statement)
Compared to the foveal region, the peripheral retina looks rather simple. The cells are larger and less complex, there is only one row of photoreceptor with mixed rods and cones, only one layer or retinal ganglion cells which are not even packed very densely.
O.k., back to the retinal vs cortical magnification factor in monkey or human. Below, the path of a few light beams is superimposed on the monkey fovea from above (yellow lines). At the vitreo-retinal interface the beams are refracted away from the center of the fovea until they hit the photoreceptors. The orange lines show the further destiny of the (now neuronal) signals. The first step involves a slight bending towards the periphery on the level of photoreceptor inner segments and cell bodies. The major distortion occurs on the level of the photoreceptor axons (Henle's fibers; HF) that transmit the signal to the terminals (cone pedicles) at the point of the arrows. The next level of distortion occurs on the way through the INL, based on the architecture of the bipolar cells. The last step in this regard involves the dense packing of the retinal ganglion cells. since each retinal ganglion cell occupies the same space in the brain, the stacking of these cells into multiple rows alone will already result in a dramatic over-representation but it is the entire retinal architecture which is responsible for the retinal magnification factor in its full extent.
|