Manufacturing Strategy Processes Decision Points
These are the points within the manufacturing strategy at
which decisions are called for, or information is being collected
in order to inform a decision. Links are provided to descriptions
of potentially useful supplementary tools.
Manufacturing Strategy
Part 1 - Grouping Products
In this part, which is common to both the Manufacturing Strategy
and Performance Measurement processes,
the aims are for the company to:
- identify product groups with distinct competitive requirements.
- collect data on identified product groups.
Companies should aim to cluster their products into between
1 and 5 groups based on their competitive requirements. For many
companies these will be simple tasks, however, some organisations
may be competing in complex, unknown, or very fragmented markets,
or may have very complex product ranges and may thus need further
decision support tools.
Tools may be required to help:
- gather the required market information
- process or organise the information gathered
- cluster products into meaningful groups.
- collect data on identified product groups
Gathering Market Information
Customer views from survey and
interview
Published market research data,
Competitor Information - annual reports from Companies House,
Industry trends from publications such as the Financial Times.
Sales Data (including lost
sales and market share).
Organising Gathered Information
Standard spreadsheet and database
software
Matrices.
Statistical software
Graphs for Sales Growth
and Market Growth.
Product Life cycle for an individual product or group can
be plotted as a graph, shown as a position (now) on a generalised
product life cycle graph or on
a Boston Plot.
Clustering Products
Clustering process.
2 x 2 matrix.
Polar chart.
Statistical software.
Standard find and sort procedures in spreadsheet
and database software.
Collect Data on Identified Product Groups
(Sales as % of total sales; Contribution as a % of total contribution;
Contribution as a % of group sales; Market share / Competitor
ranking / Number of competitors; Sales growth, Market growth,
Product group life cycle).
Most of the data required above should be available from the
company's sales recording system,
either in the form of monthly/annual sales reports or as on screen
enquiries. Items that in our experience some companies have trouble
with are:
- Market share.
- Number of competitors.
- Competitor ranking.
- Market growth.
This information can be difficult to acquire in some industry
sectors and may require investigation of information
sources such as magazine, newspaper and journal articles,
national and international company and customer surveys, government
reports, visits to industrial fora such as trade fairs and conferences
and participation in benchmarking
exercises.
Part 2 - What are the Objectives of Our
Business?
In this part, which is also common to both the Manufacturing
Strategy and Performance Measurement
processes, the aims are for the company to:
1. agree business objectives for each product group, by:
- Identifying customer needs
Customer survey, requests, returns and complaints. Information
from sales staff is vital but steps should be taken to ensure
that it accurately reflects customer requirements and is not
merely the sales staff's fantasy or unsupported belief. Consider
Quality, Time, Cost and Flexibility.
Many potential stakeholders are listed in the workbook and
individual companies may have others not shown on this list.
As well as identifying who the stakeholders are, it may prove
useful to rank or weight them in some way. [Analytical
Hierarchy Process, Criteria
rating form]. Some stakeholder requirements (e.g. government
regulators) may need to be met first, simply in order to be in
the market at all. Others while still important or relevant may
have a smaller impact on the conduct of the business.
On a larger matrix of ranked stakeholders / stakeholder needs,
apparent trade-off situations
could be identified and attempts made to resolve them. There
is also available neural network software that can be 'taught'
about the situation which it will then attempt to resolve. An
AHP type of matrix may also be
useful here.
- Identify what implication these combined needs have for the
business.
Force field analysis.
Matrix of customer and stakeholder needs looking for conflicts.
- Set improvement targets for each business implication
Prioritisation of objectives.
Should targets be stretch? Realistic? Minimal? Benchmark?
Based on competitor performance? How do we ensure consistency
between individual targets? [Importance
/ performance matrix, Criteria
rating form, Strategic Assessment
Model]
- Set time scales for the attainment of each target
As "set improvement targets" above.
- Check whether your business objectives are consistent with
any business strategy you might have.
How do we ensure consistency between targets and our business
strategy? [Strategic Assessment Model,
Forcefield Analysis, Generic
Competitive Strategies]
2. agree who can contribute to achieving the objectives by:
- Assessing contributions to the attainment of the objectives.
As well as identifying who the stakeholders are, it may prove
useful to rank or weight them in some way. [Analytical
Hierarchy Process, Criteria
rating form]. Some stakeholder requirements (e.g. government
regulators) may need to be met first, simply in order to be in
the market at all. Others while still important or relevant may
have a smaller impact on the conduct of the business.
3. agree who will be responsible for the attainment of each
objective.
This is likely to be the individual representing the function
that has the most to contribute to the attainment of the target.
Part 3 - What is Our Current Strategy?
The aim of this part is to:
- Identify current manufacturing strategy, by constructing
a strategy chart
We are not aware of any better way of doing this (there are
other ways, but not so good). Look for software
to aid chart formalisation, presentation and maintenance.
Read Mintzberg's 5 P's for
Strategy. Read Porter's Generic
Competitive Strategies (Ways of competing)
If the chart is reduced to a software form, it may be possible
to use software to assist in its analysis. (E.g an updated version
of [Eden's] COPE software, incorporating
colour.
Part 4 - Can Current Strategy Achieve
Our Objectives?
The aims of this part are to:
- Assess current strategy
- Collect first thoughts on developing our strategy.
Brainstorm.
Gap analysis.
Robustness analysis.
- Collect apparent constraints on our strategy making.
SAST
Part 5 - Navigating Towards Our Business
Objectives
The aim of part 5 is to:
- Align actions with business objectives, by:
- generating potential course changes, by:
- generating ideas for meeting business objectives
Gap analysis.
Performance measurement system.
Robustness analysis.
Feedback, control, SPC.
- summarising the potential course changes.
Force field analysis
- evaluate potential course changes by:
- checking cost benefit and risk
Cost benefit and risk analysis.
Robustness analysis.
Sensitivity analysis
- checking interactions with current activities
Conflict matrix.
Force field analysis
- checking whether capabilities are being created or opportunities
being cut off.
Robustness analysis.
- checking whether the goal posts have moved
- Checking potential changes against other parts of your strategy.
Conflict analysis matrix
- implementing changes and corrections, by:
Media. Channels. Culture.
Time scales. Performance measures. Feedback.
- linking strategy implementation to the performance measurement
recognition and reward system
Performance measures, Feedback.
Part 6 - Again and Again and Again.
The aim of part 6 is to:
- install an ongoing process of strategy making.
Acculturation. Building into performance measurement system.
Review decision making processes. |