NGC 6715 Bennett 118 Messier 54, GCL-104 RA 18:55:05 Dec -30°29.0' Globular
cluster |
Discovered by Messier in July 1778, he called
this globular a very bright nebula, discovered in Sagittarius.. It is
bright in the centre and contains no star, seen with an achromatic telescope of
3.5 feet.
In the Appendix to the 1912 'Scientific Papers
of Sir William Herschel' this object is described as 1784, June 24. A
round, resolvable nebula. Very bright in the middle and the brightness
diminishing gradually, about 2.5' or 3' diameter. 240 power shews two pretty
large stars in the faint part of the nebulosity, but I rather suppose them to
have no connection with the nebula. I believe it to be no other than a miniature
cluster of very compressed stars resembling that near the 42nd Comae [M53]. It
is like that under Delta Sagittarii [I.50 = NGC 6624], but rather larger and
brighter tho' not much. 1784, July 13. A cL, vB, R, nebula, mbM, and breaking
off suddenly, the rest being much fainter.
Dunlop 624 a very beautiful nebula, with
a very bright round well-defined disk or nuclei, about 15 arcseconds diameter,
surrounded by a gradually decreasing light or chevelure, about 1 1/4' diameter,
this is exceedingly bright immediately at the centre.
h: globular, B, R, gmbM, diam in RA = 9
seconds, clearly resolved with left eye. On a second occassion he called
it globular, B, pL, vlE, gbM, 2.5' diameter, resolved into stars 15m, with
a few outliers 14m. His third observation was recorded as vvB, R,
psvmbM, to a large nipple, diam 2.5', pos of a star 13m almost involved = approx
147 degrees. On July 16, 1836 he wrote: Observing in equatorial
[5-inch refractor] zone review; B, sbM, 90 arcseconds.
Burnham notes that M54 seems perfectly
round, showing no evident ellipticity, and has a rather high surface brightness
which permits fairly high magnification. Although quite bright and strongly
compressed, this is not as easy cluster to resolve; under good conditions it may
show some sign of granularity with a 10- to 12-inch aperture; smaller telescopes
show only a round fuzzy spot.
Houston notes that this cluste is about 8th
mag and has a 2.7' diameter in his 4-inch refractor. He reports that KG Jones
writes: looks almost like a planetary nebula at first sight.
Hartung notes that a 12-inch shows granularity
but no real resolution.
Stewart Moore (Fleet, Hampshire, UK),
observing with a 12-inch f/5, writes in the The Webb Society Nebulae and
Clusters Section Report No. 10, July 1992: Very bright and small, with a
diameter of about 4'. Stands magnification well. Stars only resolved at edge of
cluster. Perfectly round.
Tom Lorenzin: 9M; 6' diameter; barely
resolved round glow with very bright core; compressed and dense; 13M star SE of
core.
Steve Coe, observing with a 13 f/5.6,
notes: (M 54) Bright, pretty large, round, much, much brighter in the
middle at 165X. Resolved 5 stars at 220X. It could be seen in the 11X80 finder.
11x80: Small bright 8th mag
glow, softly focussed star, but the distinguishing envelope readily seen.
(suburban skies) [AS]
6-inch f/8.6 Newtonian: At
52x, the one-degree field is free of bright stars. The cluster is bright, and
has a small bright nucleus. (suburban skies) [AS]
8-inch Meade, 18mm eyepiece, 36.2
fov: Moderately bright, medium in size, round compressed globular
cluster, with a core becomes gradually brighter. Resolved stars, with a diffuse
envelope. Busy starfield. (suburban skies) [MS] |