Chapter 4
Chapter 1 Chapter 2A Chapter 2B Chapter 2C Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5A Chapter 5B Chapter 14 Chapter 10A Chapter 10B Chapter 12A Chapter 12B Chapter 13

 

Chapter 4  Earthquakes / Brittle Faults - Key Points:


1. Distribution

  1. Global: See Fig. 3.9 (P.57)
  2. Principally, but not exclusively, related to plate boundaries of the 4 overall types. Also-old fault zones within plates eg. East Ontario / Quebec.

    (i)Divergent

                    eg. Sea floor spreading ridges; East African Rift Valley System

    (ii) Convergent

        (a) Subduction zones:

                    eg. Major trenches (eg. Chile; Japan)

        (b) Collision zones:

                    eg. Himalayas; Alpine Mountain System

    (iii) Transform (Lateral motion)

                    eg. San Andreas (P.111)

                    North Anatolian fault, North Turkey

  3. Earthquakes in Canada: See overheads
  4. Lake Ontario/ Toronto Region:

                           Relevant to nuclear reactor sites. (See overheads).


Click here to view a diagram of Earthquake Epicenters


Click here to view a picture of the relative motions of the tectonic plates


Click here to view a diagram of the cross section of the plate tectonic model


Click here to view a picture and article on the 1999 Colombia earthquake


Click here to view a simplified tectonic map of the eastern Mediterranean


Earthquakes in Canada

  • 200-300 earthquakes recorded per year ( see next)
  • 10-20 p.a. are sufficiently strong and widely felt to result in public response.
  • 8 major earthquakes this century of >R7:
    • 5 in the West (2 in the Queen Charlotte Islands> R8)
    • 2 in the East
    • 1 in the Arctic
  • East has ~ 1 earthquake per decade of >R6 (not much more)
    • West 2>R6.5
    • Arctic 2 >R6.5

Large earthquakes in the East:

  • Quebec City, Quebec 1630 >R8
  • Cornwall, Ontario 1944 R5.9
  • Lake Erie 1986 R5.7

Eastern USA

  • New Madrid, IL 1811-12 ~R7.1-7.4
  • Charleston, SC 1886 ~R7.5

Click here to view a map of Canadian Seismicity


Click here to view a map of Ontario Seismicity


2. Cause

  1. Large Scale:
  2. Principally consequences of plate tectonic extensional, compressional and lateral movements.

  3. Specific- Movement on faults:
  4. Two end-member types of fault movement

    (i) Sudden:

    Elastic Rebound Theory

            -Frictional resistance on fault plane

    -Accumulation of elastic strain

    -Sudden release and emission of ground shaking waves + internal P and S waves

             Eg. P.73

            Eg. Loma Prieta 1989 (Magnitude 7.1); oblique slip: ~2m horizontal + a ~1m vertical.

    (ii) Continuous: fault creep

    Faults with low frictional resistance permit continuous movement with low seismicity below a low threshold.

    Eg. Hayward Fault( Berkeley)-mm/year

    Clearly there is a complete gradation of behaviour between (i) and (ii)To some extent, for a given overall average strain rate, the longer the time gap, the larger the earthquake (the more stored elastic strain energy).


moving_fences.jpg (82948 bytes)


Loma_Prieta_earthquake.jpg (132925 bytes)


3. Types of faults:

In simplest terms- as given on P.72

  1. Normal-extension
  2. Reverse-compression
  3. Strike slip( right or left lateral)-lateral (horizontal) motion

Click here to view a picture on different types of fault


4. Earthquake Description:

See P.74

  • Exact position within earth = Focus (x/y/z)
  • Surface position directly above: Epicentre

Damaging earthquakes- few km from surface

Maximum depth @ 700 km in subduction zones

Eg. Bolivia; June 9,1994: Magnitude 8.3 at a depth of 637km

 1.Body Waves (internal):

  • P (Primary-arr. first): compressional waves

Transmit through liquid; ~10km /s velocity in earth

  • S (Secondary-arr. second): transverse or shear waves

    Do not transmit through liquid; this is how the outer Fe/Ni core has been found to be liquid.

  • ~5km/s in earth
  • ~1/2 velocity

paths_of_body.jpg (50612 bytes)


2. Surface (L) Waves:

Complex rolling ground motion -> can produce motion sickness if prolonged.

Two end member types: See P.75

  • Rayleigh Waves- complex up/down motion reflecting elliptical ground motions.
  • Love Waves- side to side motions- the most destructive.

5. Earthquake Location:

Triangulation

See P.77: (1) S-P arrival time difference: f (distance from focus) ->

(2) compute distances and plot; for >=3 seismic stations


Click here to view a picture on the ground motion during passage of earthquake waves


earthquake_epicenter.jpg (123394 bytes)


Click here to view the article "Novaya Zemlya: The quake that roared"


6. Earthquake Magnitude Measurement:

Three Scales:
  1. Modified Mercalli(P.78):

Effect of earthquakes "in the field": from felt(I) to total panic(XII).

Eg. P.79-Northridge; plot isoseismals


case_study4.jpg (223646 bytes)


  1. Richter Scale: a surface intensity scale (1935)

Logarithmic displacement scale

Hence, Rn= 10*Rn-1

=log10 standard ideal ground motion in microns at a ~100 km distance from the epicentre (+corrections) e.g. Mag.4= ~1 cm

Highest recent Richter Scale Earthquake: Alaska 1964 at 8.4 105*Hiroshima in energy. Since derived from ground motion( displacement): a function of depth, not just total magnitude.


Isoseismal_map.jpg (58286 bytes)


  1. Moment Magnitude (M):

Richter is good for surface magnitude description; but not appropriate for total energy released:

Mo*Slip*Rupture Area*Rigidity of faulted rock

Then:

Seismic energy(ERGS) is proportional to Mo

M1 or Mw1=2/3Log Mo-10.7

Largest measured=Chile 1960; M=9.5 (See P.80)


Earthquake

Richter

Magnitude

Moment

Magnitude

Chile,1960 8.3 9.5
Alaska, 1964 8.4 9.2
New Madrid, 1812 8.7 (est.) 8.1
Mexico City, 1985 8.1 8.1
San Francisco, 1906 8.3 (est.) 7.7
Loma Prieta, 1989 7.1 7.0
San Fernando, 1971 6.4 6.7
Northridge, 1994 6.4 6.7
Kobe, Japan, 1995 7.2 JMA 6.9

Click here to view a chart on earthquake magnitude and energy


Earthquake Prediction; Key points: (P.109-112)

O.K. in a very general sense; but very difficult in a specific sense in terms of specific location and time; also magnitude.

3 approaches:

  1. Statistical

From analyzing past data for a given area, can derive statistical frequencies / probabilities: very useful for building codes

Eg. Fig.4.51. Mag.8(Richter): 1 per 1,000 years

Also: Fig. 4.52

N.B. Worldwide: expect an average of 2 Mag.8 earthquakes per year.

I hadn’t realized it was so high.

N.B. Can extend record back in past by, for example, 14C dating of disrupted marsh horizons.


richter_magnitude.jpg (48474 bytes)


2. Geophysical:

Some geophysical parameters which can be measured can change in advance of earthquakes partly as a consequence of:

Dilatancy:

i.e. with inc. stress microcracks open; and become fluid filled

eg. fig 4.5.3

eg P wave velocity goes down, relative to S wave velocity by ~10%;

Therefore  Vp/Vs can go down in advance

Also: radon release; electrical resistively change; ground tilt.


earthquake.jpg (100326 bytes)


3. Geological:

Eg.Asperity/locking model of earthquake segments:

  1. Major locking("asperity")zones:
  2. Strain build-up: infrequent, but large earthquakes.

  3. Less significant locking:
  4. More frequent; smaller shocks

  5. Creep zones:

Low magnitude earthquakes and microearthquakes

Eg. Fig.4.54


7. Principal Natural Effects(P.81-92):

  1. Ground Shaking:
  2. Esp. side to side Love waves

    Structural damage; Fire-broken gas mains

    Eg. Expressway viaducts, buildings, etc.

  3. Landslides:
  4. Eg. ~17,000 produced by Northridge

  5. Liquefaction: Damage eg. Alaska (P.86)
  6. Ground rupture/elevation changes:

Produce:

--> Fault shapes

--> Flooding/ Exposure e.g. 11m - Alaska 1964

     5. Tsunamis("Tidal waves"):

Eg. Hokusai’s famous great wave (one of the 36 views of Mount Fuji)

     6. Conquences:

Various; all negative

Therefore, high quality engineering design and construction are critical. eg. P.112


loma_prieta.jpg (76348 bytes)


avalanche.jpg (68929 bytes)


Click here to view pictures of the effect of an earthquake in Japan; 1964


Click here to view some pictures on the effect of earthquakes in Colorado and Alaska


Click here to view pictures on the evolution of a tsunami