The Lizard Meets The Positive Light
Author: The Lizard
First published: April 2000
Most the people reading the magazine will have first heard of the
Positive Light through Tales from the Engine Room, so I asked how that came about. Sheer
cheek! replied Mark, and he and Tony laughed. This set the pattern for the
interview, with Mark and Tony making fun of each other, and racing to be the one with the
joke answer. However, this didnt stop them going into a lot of detail, and Marks
real answer regarding Tales was similarly full of detail.
I had an idea in 96 of doing remixes of Afraid of
Sunlight and phoned Hit & Run and asked if theyd be interested. They
phoned and said the band were quite into the idea and we sent them the African Mission
record, that wed done the year before. Eventually we got a call from Steve Rothery
to come down to the Racket Club where they were working on TSE. I went and met them and
heard some of the playback of the album. It had become impossible to do AOS, because they
were no longer with EMI, and they decided they wanted the remixes done of TSE. We did one
track that Christmas [Estonia] and brought it back and played it to them. We went to the
record company [Castle] and they decided they liked the project and we agreed the deal.
So we did 80 Days, and a couple of different mixes of Memory of
Water. In the midst of all of it, the guy who was at Castle, John Knowles, decided he wasnt
staying so he went off to Eagle Rock. His replacement didnt like the project, so
decided they didnt want it. So, we were finishing an album without a deal or any
guarantee of it being released. That is really why the band put it out on Racket, to
recoup some money on it, because they very graciously paid us what Castle effectively owed
us. They ended up signing it to Eagle Rock, because John Knowles had gone there and still
wanted the record. So they signed it, sold it to the fan base, and didnt really go
any further, which was a huge source of disappointment to everybody.
Mark went on to explain: Wed done acetates of MOW and
theyd gone out to 20 trance DJs, who loved it. 19 of them actually phoned us up and
said they were playing it and it was going down well. [The one that didnt was
Pete Tong]. To get a call from Paul Oakenfold, who Id never met in my life,
and never spoken to, saying Hi this is Paul Oakenfold, I love the track is
brilliant. I had a meeting with John Knowles and the guys at the Racket Club and we said
Look, weve done this off our own bat, the band has paid for the acetates, all
youve gotta do now is a couple of thousand white labels of MOW. Throw the net
wider, get it out to the club DJs and effectively they could well have quite a big club
record on their hands. He said, Yeah thats great
then nothing.
Daghorns frustration is clear as he says Yes it was in
the shops, but there was no promo. They didnt even sticker it to say theyre
remixes of the Strange Engine album, cos I think your casual observer would say Oh Ive
got those tracks already. It was just a complete balls-up the whole way it
was marketed, or not marketed, as the case was. I think its exactly the same thing
Fish has been through with Roadrunner. They know the artist has a fan base they can sell
to without any risk [and] make a shed-load of money. [They] cant be
arsed to do anything else, added Tony.
The rant continues: They dont care about where else it
goes, how much efforts gone into it or the kind of new market that it could open up.
I think at that point it would have been totally feasible for them to do two versions of
every album. That would satisfy their hardcore rock crowd, and keep the market that they
would have opened up and do the remix. Not by us every time - they could get loads of
different people to do it. I think it could have opened up a totally different avenue for
them and I think that was part of the reason for doing it. I mean we did it for creative
reasons it was just something we wanted to do. But it kind of disappeared into
obscurity, which is a real shame.
I mentioned the release of the final MOW mix on the Web Christmas CD,
and the use of the Big Beat version live. They were unaware of the Technopox release, but
Tony said of Big Beat I think we both found it quite flattering that Big Beat was
used live, cos that was quite a surprise. I was quite proud of that mix. It was definitely
my favourite out of the ones I was involved in. Mark continued, saying It was
the last one we did. It was difficult to do three mixes of one track, especially as what
we had was really just the vocal. Wed done the album mix , done the Technopox mix
(we came up with this idea of vocoding all the vocals, and it was a lot harder than the
album version more a kind of techno garage type feel). They wanted a third version
because obviously the idea was that all 3 mixes would come out on a promo twelve inch.
We looked at each other and went Fuck , said
Tony. Mark concurred, We thought What the hell are we going to do? We
had the idea originally it was going to be quite a drum n bass thing, and then
it sort of mutated. We realised half way through that we had to find some other things to
put on it, so I spent a day with them at the studio and recorded some guitars and some
harmony vocals. And some percussion, which I dont think we actually used. Tony
thought they used shakers and some bongos, but Mark disagreed. Actually
no, we sampled those bongos off a Peter Gabriel song! Er, yeah those were Ians
bongos we sampled Ians bongos, which sound remarkably like some off a Peter
Gabriel album, but theyre not. But it gave us the inspiration to put
that version together really, just getting the extra guitars. It was really interesting to
spend a day recording with them as well.
I moved the conversation from Marillion to the other side of the camp
and them co-writing with Fish. How did that come about? Tony suggested we did it
deliberately actually, just so we could match up. I dont get credited for anything
with Marillion and Mark doesnt get credited for anything with Fish.
Mark starts the story, Jez, [Fishs] business manager
phoned our manager at the time. She knew Fish and Jez and he just phoned her and asked for
a copy of Engine Room. She sent him a copy and he phoned back and said I really like
it ask the guys if they want to come to my 40th party and come up the
night before and well have a chat. So we drove up and had a meeting and had a
look around the studio. Id asked our manager if she would tape me some of the recent
Fish stuff. I kind of fell out of love with Fishs material after Vigil, but Id
never heard Sunsets on Empire. And were driving up in the car, and we put Sunsets on
and I was absolutely gobsmacked. All the way I was thinking I dont know why I
am doing this, because I dont really want to do any of the stuff Im
totally judging it at this point on Internal Exile and so on. But I heard Sunsets and went
Fucking hell. Tony, too, said he was astounded by Sunsets.
Mark is well into the story now, I was blown away and we just
listened to it repeatedly. I said Id love to do a remix of What Colour is God, and
at this point weve no idea what Fish wanted. We sat down to the meeting and he said
Im after a remix of WCiG and we did the remix. At the time wed
been working on a long ambient piece which became Plague of Ghosts, called All These
Christs at that point. Wed spent a couple of months programming and sampling and we
had the basis of it together. A lot of it was spoken word and I liked the spoken word
stuff that Fish had done on Sunsets. So we came to a sort of arrangement where we wouldnt
get paid for the remix, but hed make a guest appearance on All These Christs.
Anyway, we sent him up a working version of it, along with the remix and he didnt
like the remix at all, which we were pretty gutted about. Tony explained, He
said he wanted it to be heavier, more Nine Inch Nails. Having said that, if hed told
us before we did it
wed have had some pointer as to what he
wanted, Mark finishes for him. But he didnt say anything. He just said
go and do what you do
. So we did, added Tony.
Back to the story: We got a call and he said I dont like
the remix but I really like this other track. See if the guys want to come up for a couple
of weeks, with no sort of set thing and not paying them, but theyve got two weeks of
studio time to do what they will with. In many ways there was very little point in that
for us, because we had our own studios, but it was worth it for a crack. We thought at the
very worst well go up for two weeks and be able to work without any distraction,
which is a rarity for us.
Second day there we just got programming and carried on. [Fish]
came in and had a listen and said this is half an album really, isnt it. At this
time it was going to be half our album, which is the album we are making
now. [Fish] said Can I have it for my album? We were really surprised
there was no indication of that. He wanted it and we thought if we put
it out at this point in time the only sort of fan base we have is the people that bought
Engine Room. So at least if we create a piece of music for him hes gonna sell
seventy, eighty thousand copies, so we agreed and did it from there. And the rest is
history, as they say.
Once they had done Plague, Mark came back to finish Wess album,
but Tony talked about his involvement in Raingods, The only thing I didnt play
I didnt play anything on Rites of Passage. I heard that and thought Eurgh!
and pointedly said to both Elliott and Fish at the time I hope you dont want
me to do anything on this because I just didnt like it. The only other thing
that I didnt play on was the intro piano on Tumbledown. Everything else on
Tumbledown is me. I know it credits Mickey Simmonds with something on Faith Healer, but in
actual fact he did sod all. I did all of it. Open wounds show their evidence again,
as Mark adds Thats all right he credits Elliott for samples on Plague
and Tony agrees, Thats right and he did sod all. I pushed for the
story on the production, and Tony replied Its quite simple we should
have got a co-production credit at the very least and we never got anything. End of story.
Not quite end of story though, as Mark joins in at this point. Thats
what we were promised a co-production credit. In many respects Im glad we dont
have the production credit because I dont actually like the finished article. So Im
kind of glad, because the end result is nothing like we would have done it, but we feel
extremely hard done by, not getting the credit. If somebody had said We dont
think you deserve the production credit then we could have talked about it and
ironed it out, but nothing was said. The first we knew of it was when we got a copy of the
album. I suppose its something that has been a bit of a learning curve and certainly
wed be very wary and want to get everything very tightly nailed down before ever
doing anything with anyone again. Stuff it in writing, explains Tony.
Mark: At the start of the record, we had no idea anyone else
was going to mix it. Its just one of those things that we were trying to get
acquainted with the situation. We were pretty nervous as well. Doing the Marillion record,
they werent there. I had the nerves of having to meet them and deal with them on a
business level, but we just took the parts away and made the record. But this was a full
on situation with Fish in the room. Well, not much, but sometimes. And Elliott obviously.
Inevitably in situations in studios where people havent really had things totally
clarified as to whos doing what and why, when and how, then things can get difficult.
Tony is more direct: People fight for their own space. Mark explained the
Elliott situation further. I think Elliott was fairly comfy with Tony because Tony
was playing keyboards on the rest of the album. But my function was to produce Plague and
he had a problem with that, because hed been told he was producing the record. Hed
been told we were producing our half, so as far as Im concerned the production
decisions were mine. As far as hes concerned they were his. So that was a very
difficult situation.
Mark summarised, I think we were both nervous and didnt
have enough confidence to stand our ground a little more. In those situations, among those
kinds of people, you get walked over. I think it was felt at the end that we could very
easily be walked over, so things happened that shouldnt have done. Now it would be a
very different scenario, if we were to go and do anything like that again. At the
time of the interview, Mark and Tony had been mentioned in connection with Fishs
live album, but Tony explained Thats all right. Its in writing,
and Mark added As long as he doesnt spell my name Elliott Ness, then were
OK.
There had been rumours that theyd already written some of Fishs
next album, but Tony clarified, We havent done anything with Fish. Weve
written stuff, some of which is on this [PL] album. Weve got other stuff as well.
Mark added The honest answer is we dont know. I saw someone the other day and
Fish had told him he was recording the album here and we were doing it, but we dont
know that. Cos he hasnt told us, added Tony.
Mark: We made the decision quite a while ago that we werent
going to do it unless we produced it and we wrote the whole album or the bulk of the
album. Certainly we wouldnt write it and hand it over in the way that we did last
time. Or write it and think were getting credits that we dont end up with. We
dont need to do it - were quite happy making our own records. Yeah were
not going to sell the same number of records, but at least when we decide theyre
ready to go, thats it. The decisions ours and were in control of it. Id
love to do another Fish record, but under the right circumstances and he either respects
that or he doesnt. That will be the deciding factor over whether we do it or not. I
think weve gotta stand our ground on that one.
I moved the conversation onto their own records, initially the
difference between the Positive Light and the Silent Buddhas. Marks explanation was
that The Silent Buddhas is dancier, sort of harder-edged really. Because we write a
lot of stuff, we need more than one outlet for it. Were fairly prolific and if we
only had one project, wed want to make three or four albums a year with it, and you
cant really do that. But you can separate some of the styles a little bit, and give
it a different name. Similar to Steve Wilson, I suggested?
Mark: Yes, very similar and I think thats the way to do
it. Wed both hate the idea of being in a four or five piece band that go out and
play pubs and constantly rehearse and then make a record occasionally, with all permanent
members.. Tony was looking quite happy with the playing in pubs bit, though: I
still do that. Theres a few guys that I get together with and play once every four
or six weeks. We only do a covers set on a Sunday night down at the local pubs, but I love
doing that. Its great fun, cos you dont have to think. You just turn up, and
you hit things and it usually sounds alright. It might do to you
says Mark. Tony pointed out It goes hand in hand with the drinking somehow. Im
great when Im pissed. No doubt there would still be someone down the front
saying Itd be better if they had Mickey Simmonds, Tony agreed.
Mark added, Im not really into the pub thing, but well
probably go out and do some gigs next year, well do some Positive Light gigs.
What form would they take? Well, people sort of go into a place, and you set up on
stage and you play. And they listen. Well, no, they talk at the bar, replied Mark,
rewarding me for a silly question, as Tony put it. When they go out and play,
will it just be the two of them? Tony said, Oh no, well take out a full band.
What, I asked - drummer, bassist, guitarist, small string orchestra
Well, well
have me and Tony, and a drummer, and a guitar player and a couple of singers and well
probably sample the live strings off the multi-track tape, and hell trigger them. We
wouldnt be able to afford to have the string quartet, suggested Mark, to which
Tony replied No, thats it. Im leaving this room now. If we cant
have
I asked who will buy the new album can they leverage the connections with Marillion and
Fish, or are there other ways of doing it? Mark was first to answer, Theres
other ways. We did the African record a few years ago and our distributor heard it the
other day and absolutely loves it. He feels thats got serious potential in all sorts
of different markets. I guess we have to start on the basis that with the Fish and
Marillion connection, some of them will go out and buy what we do, and hopefully word will
spread. Were not a commercial act I mean its fairly un-commercial and
underground, which were quite happy with. Were quite happy for it to build and
to take its own course - the whole things always been a very organic process.
The organic comment triggered a series of jokes and at some point the Stereophonics were
mentioned. Tony supplied a trivia point, that they were the first band they
ever recorded at the PL studios. They came here and recorded as Tragic Love Company.
They did demos over the course of a weekend and I reckon it mustve been those demos
that got them their deal.
I asked about the other artists on Positive Records. Mentioned first
was David Booth, who Mark described as sort of a cross between Crowded House and
, but Tony talked him down. Its a sort of rockier version of that,
with a few other elements thrown in. Hes a very talented songwriter, a great singer.
That is the sort of album that I would go out and buy. When I heard it, it blew me away. I
mean this wasnt an album that I was unfamiliar with, cos I did the keyboards for the
entire album. By the time I got back [from the Fish tour] Mark had finished doing all the
work on it and got it mastered. When I heard what hed done it was like Wow!
Seriously, one of the best albums I have ever heard.
Next up is a guy who records as The Party, who Tony described as
extremely odd. Mark calls it a good record. Strange record. Tony
again, He wont do solos. If theres a chance of a solo cropping up, hell
chop it out. Very strange approach, very odd songs too. Youve got titles like When the evening comes, Samantha. Mark
explained they made the album in 19 days. Id done lots of demos with him, and
really liked working with him, so I decided to make a record with him, and we signed him
for that.
I asked about the studios and whether they rent them out, and Mark
replied, The preference is for stuff that were involved in. This years
been a case of Tony being out on the road a lot with Fish and Ive made five albums
over that period. [Tonys] played on some, or most, of them, but thats been a
case of him coming in, doing his bits and going. Really, this is the first Positive Light
record that he and I have made together and the first one of original material. Obviously
with the Marillion thing and the Fish thing, someone else was writing the lyrics. So this
is the first time weve actually done an album together top to bottom and chosen the
players ourselves. Because we havent worked together for over a year, its just
happened really easily. Itd be nice to think we didnt have to do anything else
if this was it, it would be very healthy, and wed actually get some time off.
But inevitably, were still in the building process, so we have to hire the place out
sometimes. So I take on production jobs and do a package deal on the studio and
accommodation.
Tony suggested that by the time the new kits in here, wed
be quite happy to do a dry hire on the studio, as long as weve got somewhere that we
can work. But, Mark pointed out, at the end of the day, I live
here as well. Its my home, so it would be nice not to have the commercial work
happening too often. But sometimes someone comes along and offers you an amount of money
that you cant really say no to, and you make a record for someone else. That kind of
pays the bills really.
I decided it was time for the obligatory question on influences.
Production-wise, Mark mentioned Trevor Horn, and later Beatles stuff. He also
said, Im very into real instruments, which will probably surprise people, cos
I guess a lot of the stuff weve done is electronic. Mark named Marillion as a
huge musical influence, but no others in particular. Tony said, My thing is very
much on dynamics I just love things that have got great dynamics with them.
Anything that goes from nice and spacey to right in-your-face suits me to a T. I love big
sound type things, which marries quite well with what Mark likes with the natural sounding
instruments and making them sound really punchy.
They talked about how they like to make records you can listen to
many times and still discover new things in. Tony says that although your average
punter wont necessarily be picking out thing like that, because its so rich it
still sounds fresh. Mark agreed, I hate really over-processed records. I dont
really like Tales from the Engine Room that much on reflection, because I think we
completely over-cooked it. Most of the tracks actually sounded better about two weeks
before we finished them. So how do they stop themselves over-cooking it? I dont
know I dont know that we always do. It is easy to go over the top, but at the
same time its a question of finding space for everything in terms of frequencies and
where you put it. Theres a lot of width there to play with, between two speakers. As
things progress and you get into 7.1 Surround, youve got seven, eight channels
effectively to chuck stuff out of. Suddenly you can make mixes that are more complex, but
arent going to turn into mush.
Dont you run a serious risk of disappearing up your own arse, I
asked? Marks reply was I think we probably did a while back. I guess there is
the danger of going to the nth degree of making a record that no-ones even going to
notice where the fire crackling is coming out of. Tony countered Its all
a matter of just keeping perspective. And as long as you remember that what youre
doing, someone else is going to have to listen to, then hopefully you can stop yourself
disappearing too far up your own arse.
Only time will tell if they disappear up their own arses,
disappear into obscurity, or become household names. ROBW will make sure we tell you,
whichever way it turns out.